Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Myron’s Memo

@MyronMemo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

283subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001086892445
TypeChannel
Username@MyronMemo
Created12 July 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/MyronMemo

Growth

2836 Aug 2026, 00:32 — 283 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:18 — 283 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 00:326 Aug 2026, 23:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 282–284 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 23:18283no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:32283first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 September 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
706
Videos
34
Links
1,070

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

31 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡1341.9%
🤔825.8%
🕊412.9%
💩26.45%
😁26.45%
🤮13.23%
🥰13.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 September 2023 to 4 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Mar 2025, 10:54 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 19 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

5 Mar 2024, 02:04 UTC459 viewsread 6 August 2026

李強第一份報告讀得像一個標準打工仔,早讀完早下班……

9 Feb 2024, 15:49 UTC621 viewsread 6 August 2026

說《無我》是最難聽的吹捧習近平的歌,沒有人會反對吧?

28 Jan 2024, 20:40 UTC590 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @wikinews_zh_broadcastVideo

「紅線」惹議:香港舞台劇獎頒獎禮風波 https://w.wiki/8zRH 香港舞台劇獎遭藝發局扣減資助。香港戲劇協會表示,法定機構香港藝術發展局通知,將扣減戲協上年舉辦頒獎禮最後一期資助,來屆頒獎禮亦將不獲資助。康文署亦不再為下屆、即今年的頒獎禮提供場地。頒獎禮上,是怎樣談及「紅線」「紅橋」?

27 Dec 2023, 18:21 UTC524 viewsread 6 August 2026

這段文段使用了比較正式的用詞,表達上也相當直接和強硬。根據內容來看,作者的中文水平應該算是相當高的,給他 9 分吧!加油!💪

4 Dec 2023, 12:35 UTC895 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

特區政府依法追捕周庭 ********** 香港特別行政區(特區)政府今日(十二月四日)發出嚴正聲明,因涉嫌違反「勾結外國或者境外勢力危害國家安全罪」被警務處國家安全處拘捕的周庭,公然於社交媒體表示將棄保潛逃,罔顧法紀,特區政府會全力依法追捕,並嚴厲譴責這畏罪潛逃的羞恥行為。    周庭公然表示將無視警務處的保釋條件,誠信徹底破產,亦從沒認真面對其涉嫌違反法紀的所作所為,試圖逃避法律後果。無論她以何種借口堆砌或嘗試欺騙同情,均無法遮掩其虛偽的羞耻行為,以及目無法紀的本質。    危害國家安全是極度嚴重的罪行,特區政府會全力打擊,追究到底。任何逃犯都不要妄想潛逃離港就可以逃避刑責。逃犯除非自首,否則會被終身追捕。    特區政府勸喻周庭回頭是岸,與警方合作,為自己的行為負責,改過自新,否則將泥足深陷,後悔莫及。 完 2023 年 12 月 4 日(星期一) 香港時間 20 時 26 分

🤡13💩2

30 Nov 2023, 11:11 UTC415 viewsread 6 August 2026

新华社北京 11 月 30 日电 11 月 30 日,国家主席习近平就美国前国务卿亨利·基辛格逝世向美国总统拜登致唁电。习近平代表中国政府和中国人民,并以个人的名义,对亨利·基辛格博士逝世表示深切的哀悼,向其家人表示诚挚的慰问。 习近平在唁电中表示,亨利·基辛格博士是世界著名战略家,也是中国人民的老朋友和好朋友。半个世纪前,他以卓越的战略眼光,为中美关系正常化作出了历史性贡献,既造福了两国,也改变了世界。他把推动中美关系发展、增进两国人民友谊作为毕生追求。基辛格的名字将永远和中美关系联系在一起。基辛格博士将永远被中国人民铭记和怀念。中方愿同美方一道,将中美人民友好事业传承下去,推动中美关系健康稳定发展,造福两国人民,为世界的和平与发展作出应有贡献。

22 Nov 2023, 04:21 UTC350 viewsread 6 August 2026

… https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/21/business/media/jeff-zucker-daily-telegraph.html

9 Nov 2023, 22:10 UTC306 viewsread 6 August 2026

看到柏斐文的名字不用想都知道我會看到有關什麼事情的報道……

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MyronMemo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,092,700 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Myron’s Memo” (@MyronMemo), 283 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MyronMemo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.