Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Valeriy Myasnikov⚒⏱️

@MyasnikovTime

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

163subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002400071486
TypeChannel
Username@MyasnikovTime
Description🤙🏻Life /Sport/ Fight Professional fighter 🏆KHODZHAEV TEAM🏆 MMA 16-3-2 BareKnuckle 5-0 ProfBoxing 1-0 K-1 1-0 ✔️Manager: principium.agency ✔️Spot: INDUSTRIALS t.me/industrialsnews GM gym t.me/gmgym ✔️Outfit: realboxing.ru sportpoint.ru
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/MyasnikovTime

Growth

1638 Aug 2026, 03:45 — 163 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 16:45 — 163 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:458 Aug 2026, 16:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 162–164 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 16:45163no change
8 Aug 2026, 03:45163first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 1 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
136
Videos
91
Links
62

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 51s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

132 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6146.2%
👍2216.7%
💯139.85%
129.09%
❤‍🔥75.30%
😱75.30%
🤯53.79%
😁21.52%
🙏21.52%
👏10.758%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 1 May 2026 to 27 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 May 2026, 10:29 UTC630 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

sportmarafonfest.ru Лучший спортивный фест для всей семьи ! Промокод на скидку на билет MYASNIKOV🙏🏻вся инфа на сайте выше, увидимся на фестивале🔥

🔥5😁2

19 May 2026, 09:44 UTC159 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @DocLivseyPROVideo

С кем бы вы хотели подраться на голых кулаках? 👇🏼

🔥3👏1

17 May 2026, 07:54 UTC886 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/YBbOp4kDnFU?si=jiHIl30Qlz4AUugl ❤️‍🔥🔞Выдалось оч крутое сражение, смотрим с 1:44:45 и комментируем сам бой и результат, Ваше мнение в студию🤜🏻🤛🏻 Приятного просмотра🔞

4🔥2👍1

10 May 2026, 11:41 UTC141 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @rcc_sportPhoto

😳 Жесткие последствия титульного поединка для претендента Валерия Мясникова: — ушиб глаза, который привел к изменению цвета радужки — разрыв подбородочной мышцы

😱6🤯52👍1

10 May 2026, 11:40 UTC126 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @rcc_sportVideo

🩸 Савин vs Мясников — самый кровавый бой турнира, однозначно.

🔥2💯1😱1

10 May 2026, 07:33 UTC119 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @gmgymPhoto

Валера успех неизбежен 🏆 #Валерим в твою звезду ❤️

4

8 May 2026, 11:05 UTC112 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @rcc_sportPhoto

⚡️🌪️Битва взглядов Дмитрия Савина и Валерия Мясникова перед боем за титул чемпиона RCC Hard Завтра парни возглавят 19-й турнир по боям на голых кулаках. Этот поединок напрашивался уже давно – Савин владеет титулом в среднем весе, Мясников долгое время был неоспоримым первым номером рейтинга P4P. Завтра вечером мы наконец-то узнаем, кто из них сильнее в ринге, а не на словах. 🔴Стартуем в 16.00 мск на телеканале UDA

🔥4

8 May 2026, 10:07 UTC96 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🔥Дмитрий Савин vs Валерий Мясников: битва взглядов ℹ️Завтра эти парни возглавят турнир RCC Hard 19 в Екатеринбурге. Бой пройдет за титул в среднем весе. Кто заберет❓ ❤️ - Савин 🔥- Мясников

🔥8👍1

8 May 2026, 04:47 UTC97 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @rcc_sportVideo

⚡️🌪️ Дмитрий Савин и Валерий Мясников уложились в вес перед титульным поединком RCC Hard Чемпион RCC в среднем весе и бывший первый номер P4P прошли медицинское взвешивание. Дмитрий Савин — 84,4 кг Валерий Мясников — 84,35 кг Турнир состоится завтра в Академии единоборств РМК. 🔴Прямая трансляция на канале UDAR. Начало в 16:00 мск. 🔥 Мы в MAX

🔥8👍5❤‍🔥3💯2

7 May 2026, 14:30 UTC85 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @gmgymVideo

Последние штрихи перед взвешиванием 💦

🔥8👍3❤‍🔥1💯1

7 May 2026, 10:36 UTC83 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @rcc_sportPhoto

⚡️🌪️Турнир RCC Hard 19: Савин vs Мясников. Полный кард, когда и где смотреть? В День Победы, 9 мая, в Екатеринбурге пройдет турнир по кулачным боям от лиги RCC Hard. В прямом эфире турнир покажет телеканал UDAR. Главным событием вечера станет титульный поединок в среднем весе между действующим чемпионом Дмитрием Савиным и бывшим первым номером P4P Валерием Мясниковым. В соглавном поединке сойдутся Тимур Слащинин и

🔥7👍4💯1

6 May 2026, 09:24 UTC102 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @gmgymPhoto

Медиа день 📺

💯8👍6❤‍🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @MyasnikovTime. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,022,875 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Valeriy Myasnikov⚒⏱️” (@MyasnikovTime), 163 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MyasnikovTime.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.