Channel
@MyanmarChineseCN
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,370subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1004392301314 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MyanmarChineseCN |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 6 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MyanmarChineseCN |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 1,370 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:28 | 1,374 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 1,373 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 1,373 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (6 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 19 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
克钦邦担忧星链断网波及当地 缅甸多个冲突地区近期接连出现星链终端停用，克钦邦居民担忧当地赖以维持通信、转账和获取战况消息的星链网络也可能被切断。这轮停用自7月2日起陆续出现在克伦尼邦、若开邦、实皆省和曼德勒省等地。截至8月1日，克钦邦终端仍可正常使用，但随着地理位置限制、账户审核和跨境漫游规则收紧，居民担忧断网范围可能继续扩大。 7月17日，由255个缅甸民间社会组织组成的联盟向SpaceX发出公开信，要求不要全面切断平民使用星链。联盟称，超过1300万生活在军方网络封锁地区的民众可能受影响，另有近80万名学生依靠星链连接约6000所网络学校。 SpaceX此前表示已关闭超过2500个位于缅甸疑似电诈园区附近的星链终端。缅甸民间组织支持针对电诈集团精准封锁，但警告大范围停用可能同时切断平民、紧急医疗人员、流离失所者和救援组织的通信渠道。 #缅甸华人 #缅甸 #克钦邦 #星链 #SpaceX #断网 #电诈园区 @Myan…
📢 优质频道推荐 1. 莫斯科来信 · 俄罗斯新闻 2. 新西兰生活报 3. 我在迪拜 · 阿联酋资讯 4. 柬埔寨快报 金边 西港 暹粒 5. 德国新闻（柏林 慕尼黑） 6. 东京视线｜日本新闻 7. 印尼早报 雅加达 巴厘岛 8. 东南亚新闻 · 东盟十国 9. 亚美尼亚中文新闻｜埃里温·高加索·时事 10. 斯里兰卡中文新闻｜科伦坡·南亚·时事 想让你的频道出现在这里？私聊 @pindaotuijianbot 提交申请（免费）
泰缅签署劳工、水资源及太空合作多项协议 泰国总理阿努廷与缅甸国家管理委员会主席敏昂莱在后者对泰国进行正式访问期间举行全体会议，双方就加强全面双边合作达成一致。泰国政府8月6日发布声明称，两国确认密切关系，承诺在安全、经济、跨境贸易、发展及共同跨境挑战等领域推进合作。 泰方强调边境稳定与打击跨国犯罪的重要性，包括毒品贩运和网络诈骗，同时推动边境贸易发展。双方签署了涉及劳工、水资源及太空合作的关键协议。 此次访问正值缅甸局势持续受关注之际，泰缅劳工合作对在缅务工人员及跨境就业政策可能产生后续影响，相关细则有待两国官方进一步公布。 @MyanmarChineseCN
敏昂莱访曼谷 人权组织批评泰方接待 亚洲人权与劳工权益倡导组织（AHRLA）8月6日发表声明，主任菲尔·罗伯逊批评缅甸前国家管理委员会主席敏昂莱当日开始对曼谷为期两天的访问。罗伯逊称泰国总理阿努廷接待敏昂莱是“可耻行为”，指其发动2021年2月政变推翻民选政府，使国家陷入内战。 声明称泰国与敏昂莱接触是“希望战胜经验”的尝试，最终只会因共谋在国际舞台上招致负面评价。此次访问是敏昂莱近期罕见的外交出访，引发外界关注缅甸局势及区域外交动向。 @MyanmarChineseCN
孟加拉谴责哈西娜在印对媒体发声 孟加拉外交部深夜发表声明，对 exiled 前领导人谢赫·哈西娜（Sheikh Hasina）获准以线上方式向南亚外国记者俱乐部（Foreign Correspondents' Club of South Asia）发表讲话表示愤慨。该讲话于8月5日进行。 孟外交部在午夜新闻稿中称，孟加拉对“在逃的已定罪种族灭绝者”哈西娜获准在新德里与媒体进行直播互动感到愤怒，指其与同伙对孟加拉国及其人民发表恶意言论。达卡方面表示，尽管事先已向印度政府表达对该活动潜在影响的关切，事件仍发生，深感遗憾。 #缅甸华人 #缅甸 #孟加拉 #哈西娜 #印度 #外交 #南亚 @MyanmarChineseCN
泰国缅甸社群反对当局接待敏昂莱 旅居泰国的缅甸活动人士、学生及劳工团体呼吁泰国政府勿以官方礼遇接待缅甸军政府领导人敏昂莱，指其未能为缅甸带来和平，且对两国面临的诸多问题负有责任。 相关表态发表于敏昂莱8月6日至7日访问泰国前夕。此次访问正值国际社会对其2021年军事政变及缅甸持续人权危机角色广泛批评之际。大量缅甸民众在国内流离失所，或被迫赴海外谋生。 缅甸活动人士布兰明表示，泰国不应正式欢迎一位其政权导致地区动荡的军事领导人。 @MyanmarChineseCN
缅甸冲突升级：军政府百日和平计划被指为战术手段 武装冲突地点与事件数据项目（ACLED）8月6日发布报告称，缅甸军政府于7月31日结束的“百日和平计划”并非真正寻求政治解决，而是管理冲突、分化抵抗力量并展示治理稳定的战术机制。 ACLED评估显示，军政府仍主要依赖军事进攻和经济手段应对局势。该组织7月31日发布的地图显示，缅军正发起反攻，试图夺回战略城镇和道路控制权。 当前缅甸战事与外交博弈并行，冲突呈现持续升级态势。在缅中国公民应密切关注所在地区安全形势，避免前往冲突区域。 @MyanmarChineseCN
果敢老街回忆录揭露人口贩卖链条 缅北果敢老街曾被视作淘金之地，不少人为高薪招聘或熟人介绍所吸引前往。幸存者回忆显示，所谓客服、销售岗位背后，实为限制自由、暴力控制，甚至成为犯罪交易一环。 相关调查指出，缅北部分地区曾存在依托诈骗园区的人口贩运与非法拘禁。武装力量、地方势力与犯罪团伙关系复杂，受害者护照被扣、行动受限，离开需支付高额赎金，甚至遭转卖。 老街昔日赌场、酒店、园区林立，繁华之下是无数人的血泪。随着园区被清理、案件浮出水面，所谓高薪机会背后的风险逐渐显现。对在缅华人而言，警惕以高薪为名的招聘诱惑，避免轻信熟人介绍进入边境灰色地带，是保护自身安全的重要一环。 #缅甸华人 #缅甸 #果敢 #老街 #人口贩运 #诈骗园区 #缅北安全 @MyanmarChineseCN
缅甸泰国边境河流污染 专家呼吁两国合作治理 泰国清迈大学社会科学院教授Malee Sitthikriengkrai表示，解决缅泰边境因稀土开采引发的跨境河流污染，需要两国专家、科学家、媒体、政治领袖及当地社区共同合作。 该教授回应媒体查询时强调，各方需协同行动以停止稀土开采作业。学术界正在收集实地数据，科学家负责测量评估环境影响程度，新闻媒体则需将数据及时传达给当地居民和社区。 @MyanmarChineseCN
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @MyanmarChineseCN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 62,813 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 41 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“缅甸一线 仰光 曼德勒 妙瓦底” (@MyanmarChineseCN), 1,370 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MyanmarChineseCN.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.