Channel
@My_StreamIn
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
241subscribers
+164 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002011317851 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @My_StreamIn |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/My_StreamIn |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 241 | -99 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 340 | -67 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:56 | 407 | -47 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 454 | -32 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 486 | +409 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 77 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 77 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
126 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 55 | 43.7% | |
| 🔥 | 49 | 38.9% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 4.76% | |
| custom 5203993683929616805 | 5 | 3.97% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 3.17% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.59% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.59% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.794% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.794% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.794% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Хотела с вами поделиться. У меня своего авто нет. Работала сегодня с точкой сборки авто клиента и с ним на очищение, гармонизацию и постановку защиты для авто. Очень интересные ощущения. Чувствовала изменения в энергетике авто в моменте, он словно живое существо. Не даром многие автомобилисты разговаривают со своими машинами, как с живыми людьми😁
❤5
Posted without readable text
🔥3❤1
🎙 Подкаст: Работа с Тенью: почему нас раздражают некоторые люди и как с этим разобраться 00:00:00 Коридор затмений 00:00:58 Что такое ТЕНЬ? 00:01:36 Связь ТЕНИ и ЭГО 00:02:24 Как формируется ТЕНЬ 00:05:41 Почему борьба с ТЕНЬЮ отнимает силы 00:07:17 Как обнаружить ТЕНЬ: простое упражнение 00:08:30 Как разрешить себе быть собой 🙏Предлагаю вам поисследовать свои тени в комментариях к данному посту: поделитесь тем, чт…
🔥3❤1
Бесплатный гайд по работе с точкой сборки минерала/камня Недавно я работала с точкой сборки камней для помощи близкому человеку, у которого возникли проблемы со зрением. Мне пришла информация, что важно рассказать в канале о принципе работы с минералами через точку сборки и дать алгоритм работы. И я решила поделиться с вами этим бесплатным гайдом. Поделитесь в комментариях после работы с ним, если информация откл…
❤5🔥2🥰2
Posted without readable text
❤4🔥1
Posted without readable text
❤3
Очень приятно всегда и ценно получать отзывы от своих коллег, очень крутых проводников❤️🤗.
❤6
сегодня была на сессии у Наташи @My_StreamIn - это восторг🔥🥹 мне так не хватало взгляда со стороны на те процессы, которые я проживаю как проводник и Наставник. Наташа дает не только информацию из тонкого плана, но и мощнейшие проработки. Рекомендую от Души🙏🏼🙌🏼🩷
❤6🔥1
Подкаст про: Точки сборки Ченнелинг через призму линейного времени 00:00:00 О чем этот подкаст 00:00:20 Что такое точка сборки, из каких энергий состоит, принципы работы, как устроена на примерах. 00:11:53 Практика очищения точек сборки
🔥6❤4
Photo, posted without a caption
❤6
😁😉
❤3😁1
Наталья, спасибо большое! Я даже не ожидала, что получу так много от нашей встречи, все мои вопросы были закрыты, причём мне их даже озвучивать не приходилось, ты как будто заранее все их знала, а их если что было 10шт по моему списку. Огромное спасибо за чёткие рекомендации, за практики сонастройки. Даже врача нужного подобрала, всё так чётко, структурно, восхищаюсь и благодарю ❤️🙏
🔥6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @My_StreamIn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Точка сборки с Натальей Лапиной” (@My_StreamIn), 241 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/My_StreamIn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.