#вп

Channel
Мое непопулярное мнение кф
@MyUnpopularOpinionCf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003949930974 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MyUnpopularOpinionCf |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MyUnpopularOpinionCf |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026, 04:22 | 11 | no change |
| 14 Oct 2026, 03:47 | 11 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 44.5%
- avg views ÷ 11 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4.9
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 October 2026 – 13 October 2026) |
| Views total | 98 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Oct 2026, 04:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 18
- Videos
- 3
- Links
- 14
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 36s
- Average length
- 1m 36s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
🌟🖤🖤🖤🖤♥️🔥 Конфешн по франшизе "Данганронпа"! Место, где можно поделиться своим творчеством, мнением и так далее 🌟 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 ~ НАВИГАЦИЯ☆ | ВП(8,1к+|0+) 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤
#вп
✨🤩☺️риветик🎀🌟🌟⭐️ ☺️ы же не можешь просто так взять и сбежать ! !🎀🤩🌟 послушай хотя-бы . . . ☺️ы — новая группа , ℬ 𝓀ℴ𝓂𝒶𝒸𝒽𝒾 𝒸𝒽ℯ𝓇𝓇𝓎 🛍 и это наш канальчик ! 🌟 🌟🌟🎀☺️е спеши делать выводы!! Знаешь, каналов где девочки просто сотрудничают полно , но мы отличаемся тем , что мы очень крепко дружим!! 😜😱😁 🤩🤩☺️ехе , ну что , вступишь ? 😂 🎀 Ээээй , подумай 😰 Мы ведь правда тебя ждем🎀🥹 ⭐🤩𐌡ᥲдн᧐ , ᴛᥲκ уж ᥙ δыᴛь . . . 🤩🤩навигация!!
#вп
╭ --ׄ ׅ --ׅ ׄ-- ╮ ┊ ┊ㅉ ֪ 🎀 𓆪 MP POST ︵ 🤍ׅ ʾ ⊹ ┊ ┊ ︵୨ ⟡ ୧︵ ✿ ꒰ ິ◞ ◟꒱ Порог 0+ ⟡ ༢࣪ DNI :: база, все что заканчивается на филию, сх, ┊ нфвс без блюра на рт посте. • мы не поддерживаем каналы с которыми делаем вп. • мы имеем право отказать не объясняя причину • спичников любим, обожаем и уважаем. • повторное вп делаем спустя 12 часов. Платный…
#вп
❌🤩▪️▪️▪️▪️ 🌟 ❌❌🤩▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️ ▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️☹️ ❌🌚 Пиарь свой личный канал , ищи мью, взаимные подписки 👃🤩. ❌🌚 Делись своими фотографиями, липсингами, творчеством! 🤩🤩 ✔️ @channeIpiar ❌🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚🌚❌ 🌚▪️заимный пиар [0+] 🌚▪️еклама
Кто бы что не говорил, что это реально пиздец отврат Ладно автор видео, ей пиздец обидно что её фетшеймят, но блять комментарии это просто отдельный сорт Все до одного лицемеры либо фетишисты, иначе я не могу объяснить почему им нравятся как трясутся жирные ляхи с целлюлитом и растяжками. Автору ещё повезло, она ухаживает за лицом и волосами, у неё чистая кожа и красивый макияж, но если бы не это все комментаторы бы …
#вп
🔤 ✏️ ПЕРЕЗАПУСК КФ 🌟 🔤 🔤🔤🔤❗️❗️❗️🔤 ❓· ☺️аришь за фд The Henry Stickmin ❓❓ ☺️ может и за Alan Beker ⁉️ ❌ 🆔🆔🆔 не знаешь где найти контент по твоим любимым стикманам ? 🆔 🐶 ` ☺️огда наша конфа тебе точно подойдёт 🤩❗️🦷 🦶 БОТ • ПЕРЕХОДНИК • НАБОР • МАСКОТ • ПРАВИЛА • БУСТ • ВП • РТ • ФД КОНФЫ • АДМ.ЛИСТ
#вп
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MyUnpopularOpinionCf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@BkomachiCherry · 121 postᥴᥣׁׅ֪ɑׁׅꭈׁׅꫀׁׅܻ݊ᥕᥲrძ ᥴ᥆ܻ⨍ꫀׁׅܻׅ݊꯱ׅ꯱і᥆ᥒ🎀🧪
@Clairewart · 181 post𝒢ৎ ׄ ꒢𝆹⌒ 𝓚𝑜𝓀𝑜𝓂𝒾 𝒹𝒶𝒾𝓁𝓎+𝒸𝒻 ⌒𝆹꒢ 𝆹𝅥ࣳ
@Dailycfkokomi · 151 postStickmin Confession 🕳️⭕
@StickminConfession · 1531 post𝘩𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘤 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧 📺🥛
@homestaticcf · 281 posti know . . || CF
@iknow_CF · 41 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@BkomachiCherry · 121 post𝒢ৎ ׄ ꒢𝆹⌒ 𝓚𝑜𝓀𝑜𝓂𝒾 𝒹𝒶𝒾𝓁𝓎+𝒸𝒻 ⌒𝆹꒢ 𝆹𝅥ࣳ
@Dailycfkokomi · 151 postDanganronpa Confession
@DanganronpaConfession11037 · 8,1761 postֺ ⏜ ⸼ ꪑρ ᥴꪮꪀᠻꫀᦓᦓ꠸ꪮꪀ 🎀 𝘇 𐰁
@Mp_confaa · 311 postStickmin Confession 🕳️⭕
@StickminConfession · 1531 postШыконя владыка канал
@channeIpiar · 111 post𝘩𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘤 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧 📺🥛
@homestaticcf · 281 posti know . . || CF
@iknow_CF · 41 post@𝗦𝗖𝗣_𝗡𝗘𝗧𝗪𝗢𝗥𝗞
@scp_network · 6471 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@BkomachiCherry · 121 postᥴᥣׁׅ֪ɑׁׅꭈׁׅꫀׁׅܻ݊ᥕᥲrძ ᥴ᥆ܻ⨍ꫀׁׅܻׅ݊꯱ׅ꯱і᥆ᥒ🎀🧪
@Clairewart · 181 post𝒢ৎ ׄ ꒢𝆹⌒ 𝓚𝑜𝓀𝑜𝓂𝒾 𝒹𝒶𝒾𝓁𝓎+𝒸𝒻 ⌒𝆹꒢ 𝆹𝅥ࣳ
@Dailycfkokomi · 151 post𝘩𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘤 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧 📺🥛
@homestaticcf · 281 posti know . . || CF
@iknow_CF · 41 postStickmin Confession 🕳️⭕
@StickminConfession · 1531 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@BkomachiCherry · 121 postШыконя владыка канал
@channeIpiar · 111 post𝒢ৎ ׄ ꒢𝆹⌒ 𝓚𝑜𝓀𝑜𝓂𝒾 𝒹𝒶𝒾𝓁𝓎+𝒸𝒻 ⌒𝆹꒢ 𝆹𝅥ࣳ
@Dailycfkokomi · 151 postИнфо ронпакф
@DanganronpaCFVP · 791 postDanganronpa Confession
@DanganronpaConfession11037 · 8,1761 posti know . . || CF
@iknow_CF · 41 postПЕРЕХОДНИК СТИКМАНОВ
@PerehodnikSTICMAN · 11 post@𝗦𝗖𝗣_𝗡𝗘𝗧𝗪𝗢𝗥𝗞
@scp_network · 6471 postStickmin Confession 🕳️⭕
@StickminConfession · 1531 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мое непопулярное мнение кф” (@MyUnpopularOpinionCf), 11 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MyUnpopularOpinionCf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.