Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Muhammad Rizvon | Marketolog

Channel

Muhammad Rizvon | Marketolog

@MuhammadRizvon_Marketolog

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

338subscribers

-104 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004309708164
TypeChannel
Username@MuhammadRizvon_Marketolog
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 8 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 September 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/MuhammadRizvon_Marketolog

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3384423906 August 2026 — 442 subscribers7 August 2026 — 439 subscribers14 August 2026 — 395 subscribers20 August 2026 — 377 subscribers26 August 2026 — 360 subscribers2 September 2026 — 349 subscribers7 September 2026 — 349 subscribers11 September 2026 — 338 subscribers6 August 202611 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 36 days, net -104. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 322–458 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 13:18338-11
7 Sept 2026, 23:22349no change
2 Sept 2026, 14:06349-11
26 Aug 2026, 20:06360-17
20 Aug 2026, 08:15377-18
14 Aug 2026, 04:48395-44
7 Aug 2026, 03:21439-3
6 Aug 2026, 13:04442first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.5%
avg views ÷ 338 subscribers
Avg views / post
117
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held19 (8 August 202629 August 2026)
Views total233
Reactions total18
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Sept 2026, 23:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

281 reactions across 19 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🏆4817.1%
4014.2%
🤩4014.2%
🔥3211.4%
❤‍🔥207.12%
196.76%
💯186.41%
🤣155.34%
🤝113.91%
👌82.85%
🤔82.85%
👀72.49%
😎62.14%
🌚31.07%
🥰20.712%
🫡20.712%
👏10.356%
🙉10.356%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 281 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC68 views10 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Forwarded from @Alex_Hormozi_UZPhoto

Sizlar bilan ochiqchasiga gaplashamiz! 🔴 Nasib boʻlsa ertaga soat 20:30'da sizlar bilan yopiq Intensiv razbor oʻtamiz. Spikerimiz: Muhammad Rizvon Nizomiddin boʻladilar 🔥 📌 Asosiy mavzumiz: Lid magnit, ya'ni sotuv qilish uchun to'g'ri va daromadli auditoriyani topish haqida boʻladi. Undan tashqari: @ustozation bilan 21 kunda +500 millon soʻm sotuvini qanday qilinganini razbor qilamiz ✔️ Real keyslar asosida boʻla

🏆5🔥3🤩2

26 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC165 views8 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Forwarded from @MuhammadRizvonMuallim

🎬 Pro darajadagi YouTube va VSL ssenarist kerak! YouTube videolari va VSL ssenariylar yozishda tajribaga ega mutaxassis izlayapmiz. 💰 To‘lov: har bir ssenariy uchun $20–$100 Narx tajriba va ish sifatiga qarab belgilanadi. 📌 Murojaat qilayotganda o‘zingiz haqingizdagi barcha muhim ma’lumotlarni, tajribangizni va qilgan ishlaringizdan namunalarni yozib qoldiring. Murojaatingizning o‘zi ham tajribangizni ko‘rsatib t

🔥3❤‍🔥2🤩21

17 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC359 views10 reactionsread 7 September 2026

Posted without readable text

🏆2👀2🔥2🤩2🤝1😎1

17 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC335 views9 reactionsread 7 September 2026

Posted without readable text

3💯2🏆1👀1🤔1🤩1

17 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTC315 views6 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

Bu menga qiziq? Sizga taklifim ham bor...

2❤‍🔥21🤔1

15 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC286 views13 reactionsread 7 September 2026

❓ Loyihamizda ishlash niyyatidagi mutaxassislar bormi?

🤩6💯4🔥2🏆1

15 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC265 views10 reactionsread 7 September 2026

Bu loyihamiz esingizdaya? "💯"

💯6🏆2🤩2

13 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC696 views19 reactionsread 7 September 2026

💵 Alhamdulillah, Allohning izni bilan yana bir katta loyihani qo‘lga kiritdim.

8🏆5🤩5❤‍🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC487 views27 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

✅ Kechasning o'zida yana 2 ta murojaat! Loyiha bo'yicha kechaning o'zida suhbat qildik. 💵 +100.000$ sotuv qilsa bo'ladi in Shaa Alloh ) Agar jarayon qiziq bo'lsa ulashib boraman... "⚡️"

17❤‍🔥4😎31🏆1💯1

10 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC465 views29 reactionsread 7 September 2026

2 hafta davomida hech qanday jamoasiz... 💰 (+42.000$) Taxminan 505 million+ so‘m. Bu rekordimni o‘rnatishga yaqindan yordam bergan yaqin bir ukamiz bor: @togayevs_blog Menga atigi birgina instrumentni o‘rgatdilar, men esa uni yanada takomillashtirib, ishlatib ko‘rdim. Ukamga katta rahmat! )

🏆19🤩5👌41

10 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC450 views23 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

Darsga tayyorgarlik ko'rayotib e'tibor berib qoldim! 💵Yangi rekoridim! Kimda qanday bilmadim! Ammo menga shunaqa rekordlarimni yangilash yoqadi ) Alhamdulillah )

❤‍🔥10🤩6🔥4🏆2👏1

10 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC668 views17 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

📌 Ustoz-shogirdlik dasturida bugun ilk darsimiz bo‘lib o‘tadi, In Shaa Alloh. Bu mentorlikdan umidlarim juda katta. Nega deysizmi? Birinchidan, menga zapusk bo‘yicha juda ko‘p loyihalardan takliflar tushadi. Lekin barchasiga bir o‘zim ulgurishim imkonsiz. Demak, yechim bitta — jamoani kuchaytirish va kengaytirish. 💵Ikkinchidan, ayni damda xarajati $100 000–$150 000 atrofida bo‘ladigan yangi startap ustida ishlayap

🔥6🏆4🤩41❤‍🔥1🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @MuhammadRizvon_Marketolog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTCAnonymous Poll77 voters

❓ Taxminingizcha, zapusk bo‘yicha ustoz-shogirdlik dasturimga nechta kishi yozildi?

  1. Orasidan men ham borman... )13%
  2. 50+32%
  3. 30+27%
  4. 20+17%
  5. 10+21%
  6. 5+18%

The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Muhammad Rizvon | Marketolog” (@MuhammadRizvon_Marketolog), 338 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MuhammadRizvon_Marketolog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.