Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 白月光·合肥顾客反馈群

Channel

白月光·合肥顾客反馈群

@MuaHeFei01

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

500subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001428231764
TypeChannel
Username@MuaHeFei01
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded21 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/MuaHeFei01

Growth

50050250121 August 2026 — 502 subscribers21 August 2026 — 502 subscribers29 August 2026 — 501 subscribers6 September 2026 — 500 subscribers21 August 20266 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 500–502 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 19:16500-1
29 Aug 2026, 04:54501-1
21 Aug 2026, 11:00502no change
21 Aug 2026, 10:45502first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.4%
avg views ÷ 500 subscribers
Avg views / post
57.0
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held20 (29 July 202621 August 2026)
Views total228
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken21 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTC19 viewsread 21 August 2026

【服务评分,满分10】:9.5 『推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 【日期】:8/20 【MM昵称】:77 【验证人】:Jimmy 【出击套餐】:女仆 【见面感觉】:大个嫩妹 【身材曲线】:前凸后翘 【身高】:168 【肤色,手感】 :黄白滑嫩,无痘痘 【人照相似,真人打几分】:8.5 【服务过程及感受】:跟着pp吃新人,看照片就很不错。人照八九分,妆有些浓,川妹,🐻C轻微小肚子,比较有礼貌。🐻很软很敏感,舔一会这一会那就出水润润的了,妹妹都夸舌功好。可能刚做这行不久,业务还不够熟练,女上、亲胸、咬耳朵都有,尺度也很不错,适合老玩家持续调教,新手也能不踩雷。

20 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC49 viewsread 21 August 2026

【服务评分,满分10】: 『推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 【日期】:8月20 【MM昵称】:77 【验证人】:匿名 【出击套餐】:(女仆/足控/调教) 【见面感觉】: 【身材曲线】: 【身高】: 【肤色,手感】 : 【人照相似,真人打几分】: 【服务过程及感受】:新人娃娃脸御姐身材,165身高大骨架,🐻也有料,挺敏感的,服务态度不错。过程有点小惊喜,各位可以慢慢探索,有空的话会二刷。

19 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC76 viewsread 21 August 2026

【服务评分,满分10】:10 『推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 【日期】:8/19 【MM昵称】:#77 【验证人】:啦啦啦 【出击套餐】:(女仆) 【见面感觉】:纯欲青春 【身材曲线】:丰满高挑 【身高】: 【肤色,手感】 :又白又弹又滑 【人照相似,真人打几分】:10 【服务过程及感受】:今天看群里来了个新妹妹,看着不错,随后就看到了五星好评,那还说啥了,开团秒跟,紧跟p总步伐趁着活动价出击。妹妹人美嘴甜,一见面哥哥哥得给我都叫酥了,服务一点没有新人的感觉,比我还主动,尺度一点不差。长相可甜可欲,身材更是无敌,一只手都握不下,服务过程扑面而来的青春气息,只恨时间匆匆过得太快,差点都想续个钟了。下次还来~

19 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC84 viewsread 21 August 2026

【服务评分,满分10】: 『推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 【日期】:8月19 【MM昵称】:77 【验证人】:PP 【出击套餐】:(女仆/足控/调教) 【见面感觉】: 【身材曲线】: 【身高】: 【肤色,手感】 : 【人照相似,真人打几分】: 【服务过程及感受】:新人摩卡看着非常好看啊。抓紧时间就去了。见面长的和摩卡差不多。眼睛大大的非常好看。过程中非常主动。不会因为是新人放不开。胸也很大有C了。敏感度有的看你技术了。还有新人大蟒蛇。把我都整的甘拜下风了。总之五星推荐。回头二刷。。。。

6 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC220 views0 reactionsread 21 August 2026

【服务评分,满分10】: 『推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 【日期】:8.6 【MM昵称】:果赖 【验证人】:派大星 【出击套餐】:(女仆/足控/调教) 【见面感觉】:邻家小女生 【身材曲线】:b 【身高】:160 【肤色,手感】 :蛮白的,手感很细腻 【人照相似,真人打几分】:9 【服务过程及感受】:久闻果赖好评如潮临时起意去尝尝鲜,果赖一身jk进来坐在沙发边上直视前方又时不时偷瞄我,背挺得很直好像在面试一样,遂玩心大起,三言两语逗弄两番成功破冰,贴近抱在一起有说不完的话题,初恋感很强,会二刷

6 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC206 viewsread 21 August 2026

【服务评分,满分10】:10 『推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 【日期】:8.6 【MM昵称】: 嘟嘟 【验证人】:派大星🌟 【出击套餐】:(女仆/足控/调教)女仆 【见面感觉】:第一眼大,第二眼很可爱 【身材曲线】:微胖,但是恰到好处 【身高】: 没细看 【肤色,手感】 :很好rua 【人照相似,真人打几分】:10 【服务过程及感受】:今天约了嘟嘟,一开始还等了一会,见面就被她的反差感直接拿捏住了。小巧精致的脸蛋配上那对夸张的F杯,又软又弹,真的是童颜巨乳的活体标本,眼神又大又亮,看着就让人忍不住想多看几眼。她进来的时候带着点急匆匆的鲜活感,却一点也不慌,马上就笑着跟我聊起来,问我喜欢什么节奏、哪里比较敏感,完全没有刚见面的生疏,反而特别自然、特别热情。 整个人的气场特别温柔舒服,说什么话题都能接得上,还会主动翻出自己出去玩的照片、一些搞怪的丑照给我看,一边吐槽一边笑,真实又有趣,完全是那种相处起来很放松、很有女友感的妹妹。服

4 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC177 viewsread 21 August 2026

【服务评分,满分10】: 『推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 【日期】:8.4 【MM昵称】:依依 【验证人】:星 【出击套餐】:女仆 【见面感觉】:苗条 【身材曲线】:s 【身高】:165 【肤色,手感】 :白,滑 【人照相似,真人打几分】:8.9 【服务过程及感受】二刷依依了,还是那么可爱,小话痨,身材超棒,情绪价值足,大长腿

3 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC181 viewsread 21 August 2026

【服务评分,满分10】:10 『推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 【日期】:8.3 【MM昵称】:小美 【验证人】:currie 【出击套餐】:调教(女仆/足控/调教) 【见面感觉】:好看 【身材曲线】:挺不错 【身高】:170 【肤色,手感】 :摸的挺舒服 【人照相似,真人打几分】:9.5 【服务过程及感受】:从去年开始应该刷挺多次了,最近有时间又过来了,还是一如既往的感觉,服务非常不错

3 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC169 viewsread 21 August 2026

【服务评分,满分10】:9 『推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 【日期】:7-31 【MM昵称】:小小 【验证人】:卡凳 【出击套餐】:(女仆/足控/调教)女仆 【见面感觉】:好看 【身材曲线】:有料 【身高】:168 【肤色,手感】 :偏白,还行 【人照相似,真人打几分】:8 【服务过程及感受】:小小回来了,下班了直接冲击,照片有美颜,但真人挺好看的就没换人。比较瘦,但是熊很大,B+,一手握不住,摸起来超软,想一直摸下去。mm会主动配合,非常贴心。性格活泼,聊天氛围欢快,体验很好。

3 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC150 viewsread 21 August 2026

【服务评分,满分10】: 『推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 【日期】:8.2 【MM昵称】:小小 【验证人】:tg 【出击套餐】:(女仆/足控/调教) 【见面感觉】:好看 【身材曲线】:s 【身高】:160 【肤色,手感】 :手感好 【人照相似,真人打几分】:8 【服务过程及感受】:妹子第一眼很惊艳,和照片差距不大,瘦瘦的,没想到很有料,套餐内都有,不得夸夸这里,性价比很高,必须再来

2 Aug 2026, 13:41 UTC151 viewsread 21 August 2026

【服务评分,满分10】: 『推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 【日期】:8.2 【MM昵称】:温温 【验证人】:懒洋洋 【出击套餐】:(女仆/足控/调教) 【见面感觉】:身材比例好 【身材曲线】:s 【身高】:高 【肤色,手感】 :软 【人照相似,真人打几分】:9.0 【服务过程及感受】:见面感觉挺不错的,海选选中了温温,是御姐类型的,但是性格没御姐高冷,挺逗的,聊天也挺有趣的,吻技也蛮不错的,耐久略逊于我,都挺配合的。可以亲亲很久。全身上下都软软的,抱着好舒服。该有的都有,不会看你是新手就什么什么。值得多刷!

2 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC141 viewsread 21 August 2026

【服务评分,满分10】:9 『推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 【日期】:8/2 【MM昵称】:嘟嘟 【验证人】:琰 【出击套餐】:(女仆/足控/调教)调教 【见面感觉】:麻麻级别 【身材曲线】:大白兔 【身高】:164 【肤色,手感】 :很白 【人照相似,真人打几分】:几乎一样和照片 【服务过程及感受】:来的比较早嘟嘟急急忙忙的进来看起来非常鲜活 很温柔会问我的敏感点喜欢什么 过程愉快感觉时间到的特别快

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MuaHeFei01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“白月光·合肥顾客反馈群” (@MuaHeFei01), 500 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MuaHeFei01.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.