الفيزياء 📗 | يسير ف مسار دائري نصف قطره 3m عندما يعود الي نفس نقطه البدايه فان الازاحه تساوي بوحده m؟
- 323%
- 622%
- 1.520%
- 036%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤8🔥4

Channel
@MrEnglish5
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,971subscribers
-1,693 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002207852596 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MrEnglish5 |
| Description | نسير معك في رحلتك لإتقان الإنجليزية، خطوة بخطوة نحو التفوق 🚀📚 انضم الآن 🤩👇 https://mr-english85.com |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MrEnglish5 |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @MrEnglish5/2353 · this entry5 Sept 2025, 08:42 UTC | @as6orhebglish/16985 Sept 2025, 08:42 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @MrEnglish5/2355 · this entry16 Sept 2025, 11:47 UTC | @as6orhebglish/170016 Sept 2025, 11:47 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @MrEnglish5/2357 · this entry21 Nov 2025, 10:21 UTC | @as6orhebglish/170221 Nov 2025, 10:21 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @as6orhebglish/17032 Dec 2025, 17:51 UTC | @MrEnglish5/2358 · this entry2 Dec 2025, 17:51 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @MrEnglish5/2361 · this entry22 Feb 2026, 14:32 UTC | @as6orhebglish/170522 Feb 2026, 14:32 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @as6orhebglish | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @as6orhebglish (5–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 6 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 September 2025 to 22 February 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @MrEnglish5 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 16:10 | 19,971 | -19 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 08:01 | 19,990 | -14 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 02:00 | 20,004 | -27 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 23:26 | 20,031 | -14 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 01:46 | 20,045 | -17 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 04:29 | 20,062 | -13 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 00:51 | 20,075 | -11 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 03:07 | 20,086 | -10 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:21 | 20,096 | -21 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 00:17 | 20,117 | -13 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 00:45 | 20,130 | -6 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 22:59 | 20,136 | -27 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 20:46 | 20,163 | -20 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 17:57 | 20,183 | -9 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:47 | 20,192 | -21 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:48 | 20,213 | -6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 21:27 | 20,219 | -22 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:28 | 20,241 | -12 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 19:48 | 20,253 | -19 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 15:44 | 20,272 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
97 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 80 | 82.5% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 10.3% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 5.15% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.03% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 September 2025 to 24 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
الفيزياء 📗 | يسير ف مسار دائري نصف قطره 3m عندما يعود الي نفس نقطه البدايه فان الازاحه تساوي بوحده m؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤8🔥4
الفيزياء 📗 | أي من التالي يكون دائمًا بنفس الاتجاه :
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤13👍3❤🔥1
الفيزياء 📗 | لو قذف جسم الي اعلى فكم سرعته قبل الثانيه من توقفه ف الهواء ؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
الرياضيات 📘 | كم عدد اصفار الداله ف شكل السابق ؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤4
Photo, posted without a caption
❤6
الرياضيات 📘| محيطه A, B, 30 متنصفًا ضلعيه ،كم طول AB ؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤4
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
الرياضيات 📘| سبحان الله
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤6
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1👏1
بدأنا اول كويز 🤙🤙
Channel photo updated
💎 قناة اختبار التحصيلي – منصة ياقوت قناة تساعدك ترفع درجتك في التحصيلي بأسلوب واضح وسهل 💡 شرح مختصر، أسئلة مهمة، تجميعات، ونصائح تفرق معك في الاختبار ✍️ نركّز على الفهم والتدريب الصحيح بدون حشو ⏱️ 🎯 هدفنا: درجة أعلى ونتيجة أفضل بإذن الله. انتظرونااااا قريبااااا ⏳
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MrEnglish5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
الفيزياء 📗 | يسير ف مسار دائري نصف قطره 3m عندما يعود الي نفس نقطه البدايه فان الازاحه تساوي بوحده m؟
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
الفيزياء 📗 | أي من التالي يكون دائمًا بنفس الاتجاه :
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
الفيزياء 📗 | لو قذف جسم الي اعلى فكم سرعته قبل الثانيه من توقفه ف الهواء ؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
الرياضيات 📘 | كم عدد اصفار الداله ف شكل السابق ؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
الرياضيات 📘| محيطه A, B, 30 متنصفًا ضلعيه ،كم طول AB ؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
الرياضيات 📘| سبحان الله
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 September 2025 to 24 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“منصة ياقوت💎 | التحصيلي” (@MrEnglish5), 19,971 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MrEnglish5.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.