Channel
@MrElchinsblog
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
242subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002372887269 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MrElchinsblog |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MrElchinsblog |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:35 | 242 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 241 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 242 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 244 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 244 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (28 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 228 |
| Reactions total | 17 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
76 reactions across 11 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 26 | 34.2% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 15.8% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 7.89% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 7.89% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 7.89% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 7.89% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 5.26% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 5.26% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.63% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 2.63% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 1.32% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 1.32% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MrElchinsblog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Progressiv, ahil va shubhasiz, mamlakatimizdagi eng kuchli jamoa - EVEREST TEAM a'zosiga aylaning!⛰🚀 ❗️EVEREST Toshkent shahridagi manzillariga hozirda 14 nafar administrative xodim kerak bo'lmoqda, azizlar! Ish o’rinlari uchun nomzodlar full time yoki part time ish grafigi asosida ishga qabul qilinadilar: 1) FULL TIMER ADMINISTRATOR - hozirda 6 nafar xodim kerak; 🔺Talablar: - EVEREST bitiruvchisi (qat'iy); - sir…
🔥3🎉2❤1
it seems like he is talking about me 😢😢😢 Unfortunately, 100 % true words!
😢6💯3💔2
Some people think that the main purpose of schools is to turn children into good citizens and workers rather than to benefit them as individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? A question of whether schools should play a crucial role in fostering good people in the society or helping students individually has sparked a considerable debate. Although these educational institutions can help turn children into…
❤3⚡2💯1🔥1
The first bar chart illustrates the changes of import and export between Australia and China from 1998 to 2004, while the second one shows the amount of money spent on different goods imported from China in 2003 and 2004. Overall, Australia imported more goods from China in all given years, with both figures rising consistently and reaching their peak in the final year. Of particular note is that the gap between imp…
❤2👏2🔥1🆒1
Photo, posted without a caption
ALHAMDULILLAH 🗓 Exam date : 07.06 ( 05.08 reading OSR) OVERALL : 7.0 🔥🔥 Listening : 8.0 🔥🔥 Reading : 8.0 🔥🔥 Writing :5.5 🔥🔥 Speaking :6.5 🔥🔥 🧑🏻🎓 Student : Mahmudov Bekzodbek 👨🏫 Teacher : MrElchin to join: +998949770845 @Sunnatillayevic_11 💬p.s: Hardwork always pays off if Alloh wants. This is the proof.
🔥8🎉2❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
🔥6👍4🕊2
The pie charts illustrate how the results of survey in terms of the usage of social media by people changed between 2011 and 2014. Overall, while the proportion of people who used social media weekly decreased, the reverse was true for those who relied on it either often or daily. Of particular note is that people who did not use social media saw no change at all, exhibiting the smallest proportion in both years. Al…
❤2🕊2⚡1👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
It has been increasingly common for children and teenagers to commit crime in many countries. While this phenomenon can be caused by social media exposure and lack of awareness, I firmly believe it can be addressed through educational programs and strict punishment. The primary reason for breaking laws is associated with social media exposure. Once children and teenagers are exposed to luxurious life of celebrities …
⚡3👍1🔥1
About "Zero Uzbek" approach. Have a try it, guys.
❤2
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥5💯2🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MrElchinsblog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MrElchin's blog |8.0😎” (@MrElchinsblog), 242 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MrElchinsblog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.