Channel
@MrAbbos_intensive
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
967subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002016195710 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MrAbbos_intensive |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 2 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MrAbbos_intensive |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 21:36 | 967 | -8 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 01:18 | 975 | +3 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 05:19 | 972 | +11 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 18:40 | 961 | -17 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 02:58 | 978 | +2 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 02:56 | 976 | -7 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 983 | -5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 988 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:45 | 989 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
90 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40 | 44.4% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 25.6% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 12.2% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 5.56% | |
| 🫡 | 4 | 4.44% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 3.33% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 2.22% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 1.11% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 1.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2025 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Dahigg o'zining "The Power of Habit" kitobida shu hayotiy misolni keltirib o'tadi. Bu — bo'lgan voqea. Unda shu inson 15 yildan beri xotirasini yo'qotib qo'ygan bo'ladi. Na o'z ismini, na boshqalarning ismini — hech kimni eslay olmaydi. Har kuni xotiniga qo'rqib, "sen kimsan?" deb savol berar edi. Xotini esa har kuni eslatib, "sen shu insonsan, men sening ayolingman" deb, boshqa narsalarni ham aytib bergandan keyin, …
👍2
https://youtu.be/Y-9r4SCCmdc?si=j8EYckq3lM5wfu8B
Video, posted without a caption
❤1
# Imom al-Buxoriy hazratlarini Stiv Jobs bilan bog'lab turadigan 5 amal --- Imom al-Buxoriy hazratlarini Stiv Jobs bilan bog'lab turadigan 5 amal. Zamon farqi — yani bittalari 8-9 asrda va keyingilari 21 asrda yashashgan bo'lsa ham, bitta juda muhim bo'lgan odatga amal qilishgan ekan: ya'ni erta turish. Bunga yana misol — "5 AM Club" kitobi muallifi Robin Sharma yillar davomida muvaffaqiyatli odamlarni o'rganib bi…
❤2👍2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤5
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥9❤4
Bilarmidingiz Miyamiz bir kunda 35 mingta qaror qabul qiladi. Shuning uchun bazi insonlar ortiqch o’ylashdan aziyat chekadi. mayda narsalar haqida juda ko’p o’ylashadi, oqibatda ko’p energiyalarini isrof qilishadi. Vaqt o’tishi bilan BU YOMON ODATGA AYLANADI. Shu holatdan qutulish uchun 5 ta texnikasini ko’rib chiqamiz. tan olish kerak ovqat haqida gap ketganda, tanlash uchun kamida yarim soat vaqt sarflaysiz. ba'…
❤5👏1🔥1
Farzandingizga to'xtovsiz baqirib gapirish — 5 yomon oqibati 1️⃣ Bolada o'ziga ishonch yo'qolishi Pittsburgh universiteti tadqiqotlari natijasida bunday bolalar, ming afsus, o'ziga ishonchi yo'q bo'lib ulg'ayadi. Chunki uyda nima qilmasin — to'g'rimi yo noto'g'ri — gap eshitgan. Bu esa keyinchalik qaror qabul qilish qobiliyatini o'zida o'ldiradi. 2️⃣ Janjalkash va urushqoq bo'lib o'sish Bunday bolalar odatda maktabda…
❤3
O‘ziga ishonchi yo‘q odam qanday ko‘rinadi deb o‘ylaysiz? 🤔 Jim, tortinchoq, ko‘zga tashlanmaydigan? Aslida ko‘pincha unday emas. Aksincha, eng ko‘p gapiradigan 🗣, eng ko‘p va’da beradigan odamlar ichida eng katta ishonchsizlikni yashiradi. Bunday odamda ko‘pincha “pokazuxa” dardi bo‘ladi. Nima qilsa ham, odamlar ko‘rib qo‘ysin deb qiladi 👀. O‘z fikri bilan emas, boshqalarning fikri bilan yashaydi. Uning ichida doim…
👍3❤2
File, posted without a caption
“Hayotning qaynash nuqtasi” Rasmga qarang — oddiygina tuxum va kartoshka. Ammo ular ortida katta hayot saboği bor. Ikkalasini ham qaynab turgan suvga solsangiz, hayratlanarli narsa yuz beradi: kartoshka — avval qattiq bo‘lgan — yumshab qoladi, tuxum esa — mo‘rt va nozik bo‘lsa-da — ichidan qotadi, mustahkam bo‘ladi. Bir xil suv, bir xil issiqlik — ammo natija boshqacha. Demak, hayotdagi qiyinchiliklar seni kim qilish…
❤12🔥4😁2👏1🙈1
Bank o‘g‘irligi paytida o‘g‘ri bank xodimlariga baqirdi: “Qimirlamanglar, pullar davlatga tegishli, hayotingiz esa o‘zingizga!” Hamma jim yotib qoldi... «Bu fikrlash kontseptsiyasini o‘zgartirish deb ataladi». --- O‘g‘rilar o‘g‘irlikni tugatgach, oliy ma’lumotli yosh o‘g‘ri bosh o‘g‘riga (u eng katta yoshli va faqat boshlang‘ich maktabni bitirgan edi) dedi: “Ey, boss, keling, qancha pul o‘g‘irlaganimizni hisobl…
🤯5👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MrAbbos_intensive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mr Abbos” (@MrAbbos_intensive), 967 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MrAbbos_intensive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.