Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ARYAH - Mountain of God

@MountainOfGod

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

541subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002951938659
TypeChannel
Username@MountainOfGod
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MountainOfGod

Growth

534541537.56 August 2026 — 534 subscribers7 August 2026 — 534 subscribers14 August 2026 — 541 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 533–542 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 22:23541+7
7 Aug 2026, 12:34534no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:48534first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 15 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

401 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11528.7%
6716.7%
👎5513.7%
🔥5213.0%
👍4812.0%
❤‍🔥235.74%
🤣163.99%
122.99%
🕊40.998%
👌30.748%
🙈20.499%
🤓20.499%
👏10.249%
🥰10.249%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 401reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 22 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jun 2026, 13:51 UTC985 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Thank you all for 500 subscribers. To commemorate this, I have opened a discussion chat for this channel: ——— https://t.me/+AjZ4gqNklZQwOTA0 ——— I will define its purpose, rules, intended audience, and other such matters in due course. For now, share this post, then join the chat. @MountainOfGod

👍145👏1

15 Jun 2026, 18:51 UTC≈1,010 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Get him to 100. BTW longer effort posts coming soon.

👍14

15 Jun 2026, 18:50 UTC858 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Phineas_priests

thanks for 80 subs

6❤‍🔥4🤓2

14 Jun 2026, 16:43 UTC847 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

"I AM A DISCIPLE OF THE ANOINTED JESUS AND I STAND BY AND STRIVE TO LIVE UNCOMPROMISINGLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PRINCIPLES OF GOD AS FOUND AND DEMONSTRATED IN HIS ORIGINAL AUTOGRAPHS. THIS INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, THE PRESERVATION OF MY RACE AND ALL THAT GOD CREATED AND CALLED GOOD, AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF GOD'S GOVERNMENT IN THE HEARTS AND MINDS OF MY ADAMIC ISRAELITE KINSMEN." — BRUCE CAROLL PIERCE

11

14 Jun 2026, 15:49 UTC708 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

"The ultimate objective of man should be self-sacrifice on behalf of his own people, to advance their cause and to edify their community... That is the essence of Christianity... Christianity is not found in ones mouth... Rather Christianity is found in one's actions. The man who spends his life... for the good of his own kindred that man is the ideal Christian even if he never professes Christ with his lips... The m

9❤‍🔥2🥰1

14 Jun 2026, 12:02 UTC698 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

CLARIFICATION POST (Part 2) Actual Point I Was Making: Primary Thesis: The modern church is in such complete apostasy that even those who blaspheme God's name while practicing racial separation are closer to His Law than those who invoke His name while practicing race-mixing. This is a condemnation of the church. It is NOT an endorsement of Satanism/paganism/atheism. Secondary Thesis: The fact that every legitimat

12👍4👌2

14 Jun 2026, 12:02 UTC733 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

CLARIFICATION POST (1) (2) What I AM Saying: 1. Structural Analysis =/= Moral Endorsement My chart comparing various NS religions was descriptive analysis. It was not prescriptive alliance-building. When a biologist identifies structural similarities between a wolf and a dog, he is not suggesting they should be treated identically or housed together. Similarly, identifying that Joy of Satan, Creativity, and Cosmoth

👍9👎6👌1

13 Jun 2026, 20:34 UTC≈1,820 views76 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Extension The image above demonstrates the reality of this, showing how, when one strips away all aesthetic framing (theological-specific language, historical meta-narratives, etc.), the underlying structure, methods, aims, goals, and eschatology of the various faiths of modern National Socialism are identical. They all adhere to the "Universal Order" and advance the "Will of The Father", though only one professes H

👎4924🔥3

13 Jun 2026, 20:33 UTC866 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

—Matthew 21:28-30— "...A man had two sons, and having come forth to the first he said: ‘Son, go, today you must work in the vineyard.’ But he responding said ‘I do not want to’, however changing his line of conduct he went. Then coming forth to the other he spoke likewise. And responding he said “I shall, master’, yet he did not go. Who out of the two sons has done the will of the father?” They say “the first!" Jesus

10👍3🔥1

12 Jun 2026, 19:16 UTC597 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

—Deuteronomy 11:24— Every place whereon the soles of your feet shall tread shall be yours.

13🔥31

12 Jun 2026, 19:12 UTC499 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Zionism is an ethnonationalist movement seeking to establish a Jewish ethnostate by colonizing Palestine. Now, as you’ve read the title, you may ask yourself “how the hell are these two words compatible?” Well they aren’t, Atleast using the definition we have mentioned. But if we look at it from a simple perspective, it’s just outright Jewish colonialism. We simply oppose Zionism because it ultimately benefits the k

15❤‍🔥3👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @MountainOfGod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 171,845 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ARYAH - Mountain of God” (@MountainOfGod), 541 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MountainOfGod.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.