Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

MorphoSyntax

@MorphoSyntax

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,238subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002074301112
TypeChannel
Username@MorphoSyntax
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MorphoSyntax

Growth

1,2371,2401,238.56 August 2026 — 1,237 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,237 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,239 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,240 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,238 subscribers1,2386 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,237–1,240 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 07:521,238-2
9 Aug 2026, 16:351,240+1
7 Aug 2026, 00:101,239+2
6 Aug 2026, 13:461,237no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:371,237first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.1%
avg views ÷ 1,238 subscribers
Avg views / post
360
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (4 December 20255 August 2026)
Views total2,522
Reactions total143
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

421 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20849.4%
👍10224.2%
😁4811.4%
👌235.46%
👎122.85%
😢81.90%
🤔81.90%
🆒51.19%
🙏30.713%
👏20.475%
10.238%
🤩10.238%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 421reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 December 2025 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC185 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026

☰ ☑️ معناشناسی | نقش معنایی 🖇 پرسش زیر، یکی از سؤالات کنکور کارشناسی ارشد (۱۴۰۵) است که با حوزۀ معناشناسی و نحو پیوند دارد: ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ۹۶ ـ سازۀ درون قلاب در کدام مورد، از محمول (predicate) جمله نقش معنایی (thematic role) دریافت نمی‌کند؟ ۱ ـ تصمیم گرفته‌ام این فیلم را حتماً [با سینا] ببینم. ۲ ـ همۀ کتاب‌های زبان‌شناسی را [برای سینا] فرستادم. ۳ ـ [سینا را]

👍24👎2

5 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC184 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

☰ 🚦دستور خط | رژهٔ لب‌ها چـو سـام ســپهدار زان "سـان" بـدید خجل گشت و "لشکر" به آتش کشید ✍🏿 سام‌نامه، حکایت جنگ خرطوس با سام! @MorphoSyntax

😁10😢1🆒1

29 Jul 2026, 10:20 UTC518 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

☰ 💎 نحو | سببی و پادسببی ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ◄آب ریخت. ◄بچه آب را ریخت. ◄شیشه شکست. ◄بچه شیشه را شکست. ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ □ این نوع فعل‌ها را می‌شناسید. در سنت دستورنویسی فارسی، چنین جفت‌هایی را افعال دووجهی خوانده‌اند؛ یعنی فعل‌هایی که بدون هیچ‌گونه تغییر ساختواژی، هم کارکرد لازم (در اینجا: نامفعولی) دارند، هم مت

11👏2🤔1🙏1🆒1

28 Jul 2026, 20:30 UTC418 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

☰ 📝 ویرایش | به‌صورت/ به‌طور 🖋اگر برای نوشتن مقاله و مدخل و خبر، کلمه‌شمار دستمزد می‌گیریم، که هیچ. اما اگر نه، «مستقیم» و «جداگانه» می‌توانند گذشته از آن‌که در نقش وابستهٔ پسین اسم به‌کار روند، در جایگاه قید گروه فعل نیز بنشینند و برای پذیرفتن چنین نقشی، به عبارت‌های زائدی مانند «به‌صورت» و «به‌طور» نیاز ندارند. ★صفت: ◄ چین با انصارالله یمن گفت‌وگوی [مستقیم] کرده است. ◄ پکن برای هریک از کشتی‌های خود مجوز عبور [جد

11👌3🆒3😢1🙏1

28 Jul 2026, 09:22 UTC393 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026

☰ ☑️ صرف‌ونحو | زمان دستوری 🖇 پرسش زیر، یکی از سؤالات کنکور کارشناسی ارشد (۱۴۰۵) است که با حوزۀ صرف‌ونحو پیوند دارد (از میان پرسش‌های مشترکی که برخی دوستان با بنده در میان گذاشته‌اند): ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ۸۲ ـ در جملۀ مرکب زیر، تصریف زمان دستوری (tense) کدام فعل متفاوت است؟ «ممکن است به‌نظر برسد دولت انتظار نداشته است پروژۀ سدسازی را که در شروع سال گذشته آغاز شده ب

👍27👎1😢1🙏1

27 Jul 2026, 19:00 UTC450 views32 reactionsread 6 August 2026

☰ ☑️ صرف | (تکـ)واژگونه‌های ریشه 🖇 پرسش زیر، یکی از سؤالات کنکور کارشناسی ارشد (۱۴۰۵) است که با حوزۀ صرف پیوند دارد (از میان پرسش‌های مشترکی که برخی دوستان با بنده در میان گذاشته‌اند): ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ۸۰ ـ کدام مورد دربارۀ ساختواژۀ واژه‌های «ناسازگاری» و «ساختمانی» درست است؟ ۱ ـ یک تکواژ واژگانی آزاد در واژۀ «ساختمانی» وجود دارد. ۲ ـ تعداد تکواژهای «ناسازگاری»

👍21👎91😢1

2 Jan 2026, 19:05 UTC≈1,460 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026

☰ 🧊 ساختواژه | تهی در برابر صفر ◄(۱). بچه‌ها سنگ رو به شیشه کوبوندند. ◄(۲). بچه‌ها با سنگ شیشه رو شکستند. ❂ در دو نمونهٔ گفتاری بالا، فعل «کوباندن» یک تکواژ تهی (null) و فعل «شکستن» یک تکواژ صفر (zero) دارد. این دو جمله، به‌ترتیب، همتای جملات ۳ و ۴ در زیرند. ◄(۳). بچه‌ها سنگ رو به شیشه کوبیدند. ◄(۴). بچه‌ها با سنگ شیشه رو شکوندند. ❂ گرچه گاهی تکواژ تهی و صفر به تسامح به‌جای هم به‌کار رفته‌اند، این دو پدیدهٔ ساخ

12👌6👍2🤩1😢1

2 Jan 2026, 19:05 UTC≈1,050 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

☰ ▫️زادروز امیرِ مؤمنان (ع) و روز پدر فرخنده @MorphoSyntax

20

2 Jan 2026, 15:11 UTC≈1,010 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

☰ 📝 ویرایش | حشو (۷) ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ «امکان دفاع از پایان‌نامه‌ها به‌صورت مجازی بلامانع است.» ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ 🖊در جملهٔ بالا واژهٔ «امکان» کاملاً زائد است و حتی معنای جمله را مختل کرده است. ◄دفاع از پایان‌نامه‌ها به‌صورت مجازی بلامانع است. ◄دفاع مجازی از پایان‌نامه‌ها منعی ندارد. ◄دفاع مجازی مجاز است. @Mor

👌105👍5😁2

31 Dec 2025, 08:27 UTC859 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

☰ 📗 کتاب | نحو تجربی ▪️The Oxford Handbook of Experimental Syntax (2023) ▪️Edited: Jon Sprouse ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ ـ ـــ 🔝ساحت نحو همواره میان‌رشته‌ای بوده است؛ از یک‌سو سرشت علوم شناختی چنین است و پژوهش در حوزه‌ای فراخ که با چندوچون شناخت در ذهن آدمی سروکار دارد، نیازمند تلاش هماهنگ چندین رشته است، از دیگرسو ماهیت نظریۀ نحوی نیز چنان است که به میان‌رشته‌ای بودن آن می‌ا

11👍4👌1

29 Dec 2025, 16:31 UTC805 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

☰ 🔝یا کلاً واژه‌ها معانی تازه‌ای یافته‌اند، یا درپی سفر وزیر امور خارجه به نصف جهان، روابط ایران و اصفهان از سر گرفته شد! @MorphoSyntax

😁35😢2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MorphoSyntax. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 452,259 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MorphoSyntax” (@MorphoSyntax), 1,238 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MorphoSyntax.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.