Channel
@MoralTribes
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
94subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003775639383 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MoralTribes |
| Created | 26 February 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MoralTribes |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 23:00 | 94 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 93 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 95 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 96 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:32 | 96 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 26 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
46 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 46 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2026 to 26 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
یک سؤال باقی می‌ماند: آیا واقعاً می‌شود از قبیله فراتر رفت؟ گرین پاسخ ساده‌ای نمی‌دهد. او نمی‌گوید می‌توانیم احساسات قبیله‌ای را حذف کنیم. این احساسات بخشی از سیم‌کشی مغز ما هستند. اما می‌گوید می‌توانیم آن‌ها را «تشخیص» دهیم. وقتی بفهمیم که: خشم ما ممکن است بیش از آنکه دفاع از عدالت باشد، دفاع از گروه ما باشد اطمینان ما به درستی موضع‌مان، از یک چارچوب خاص آمده باشد و نفرت از طرف مقابل، از واکنش شهودی برخاسته باشد آن…
❤14
گرین می‌گوید اگر قرار است از تعارض‌های قبیله‌ای عبور کنیم، باید آگاهانه از سیستم دوم استفاده کنیم؛ همان سیستم کند و تحلیلی. یعنی چه؟ یعنی وقتی موضوع بزرگ است، وقتی پای گروه‌های مختلف وسط است، وقتی نتیجه روی انسان‌های زیادی اثر می‌گذارد، نباید فقط به احساس اولیه تکیه کنیم. سیستم شهودی می‌گوید: «این کار حس بدی دارد، پس غلط است.» اما سیستم تحلیلی می‌پرسد: «نتیجه این تصمیم برای بیشترین تعداد چه خواهد بود؟» گرین به همین د…
❤7
گرین می‌گوید مغز ما برای حل اختلاف «درون گروه» طراحی شده، نه برای حل اختلاف «میان گروه‌ها». در یک خانواده، یک تیم، یک قبیله کوچک، اخلاق شهودی خوب کار می‌کند. دفاع از خودی‌ها تنبیه خیانت خشم از بی‌عدالتی علیه «ما» این سیستم سریع است و کارآمد. اما مشکل وقتی شروع می‌شود که دو «ما» با هم روبه‌رو شوند. هر دو گروه احساس می‌کنند: ما داریم از عدالت دفاع می‌کنیم. ما داریم از ارزش‌های درست محافظت می‌کنیم. و چون این احساس از سی…
❤10
گرین می‌گوید مغز ما دو سیستم اخلاقی دارد. یکی سریع، احساسی و شهودی. وقتی درگیری مستقیم باشد، وقتی «دستت در کار باشد»، این سیستم فعال می‌شود. دیگری کند و محاسبه‌گر است. به عدد نگاه می‌کند. به پیامد نگاه می‌کند. پنج نفر در برابر یک نفر. در سناریوی اول، چون فقط یک اهرم می‌کشی، سیستم محاسبه‌گر جلو می‌افتد. در سناریوی دوم، وقتی باید با دست خودت یک نفر را هل بدهی، سیستم احساسی فعال می‌شود. و همین تفاوت کافی است تا جواب عوض…
❤9
یک نفر یا پنج نفر؟ یک قطار با سرعت بالا در حال حرکت است. پنج نفر روی ریل گیر افتاده‌اند و راه فرار ندارند. کنار تو یک اهرم قرار دارد. اگر آن را بکشی، مسیر قطار عوض می‌شود. پنج نفر نجات پیدا می‌کنند. اما در ریل جدید، یک نفر ایستاده است و او کشته می‌شود. اهرم را می‌کشی؟ حالا همان موقعیت، با یک تفاوت. پنج نفر روی ریل‌اند. هیچ اهرمی وجود ندارد. تو روی پلی ایستاده‌ای و کنار تو یک مرد درشت‌هیکل ایستاده است. اگر او را هل بد…
❤6
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @MoralTribes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قبیله های اخلاقی | Moral Tribes” (@MoralTribes), 94 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MoralTribes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.