Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𑣲𝓜𝓸𝓸𝓷𝓵𝓲𝓽 𝓛𝓸𝓿𝓮

Channel

𑣲𝓜𝓸𝓸𝓷𝓵𝓲𝓽 𝓛𝓸𝓿𝓮

@Moonlit_Loove

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 17 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004427910527
TypeChannel
Username@Moonlit_Loove
Description𑣲𝓗𝓮𝓻𝓮, 𝔀𝓮 𝔀𝓲𝓵𝓵 𝓳𝓸𝓾𝓻𝓷𝓮𝔂 𝓽𝓸𝓰𝓮𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓻 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓹𝓽𝓱 𝓸𝓯 𝓽𝓱𝓲𝓼 𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓬 𝓶𝓸𝓸𝓷𝓵𝓲𝓰𝓱𝓽... ‌‌ ‌ 𝓶𝓮‌ : @FatemeCHatBotbot
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 September 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Moonlit_Loove

Growth

1617 Sept 2026, 23:47 — 16 subscribers18 Sept 2026, 00:22 — 16 subscribers17 Sept 2026, 23:4718 Sept 2026, 00:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15–17 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 00:2216no change
17 Sept 2026, 23:4716first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
272.8%
avg views ÷ 16 subscribers
Avg views / post
43.6
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 September 2026
Posts held20 (5 September 202612 September 2026)
Views total873
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Sept 2026, 00:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
9
Videos
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

12 Sept 2026, 18:05 UTC22 viewsread 18 September 2026
Forwarded from @hisdeareststarVideo

‌‌ ꒰ @Moonlit_Loove ꒱

11 Sept 2026, 05:09 UTC111 viewsread 18 September 2026
Photo

𑣲𝓥𝓪𝓵𝓴𝓸 ‌ 𑣲‌𝓜𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓼

8 Sept 2026, 14:49 UTC44 viewsread 18 September 2026

𑣲part13: پسر مرموز چند قدمی از درخت فاصله گرفته بود که ناگهان ایستاد. لبخند مرموزش همچنان روی لب داشت، اما چشمانش برای لحظهای کمرنگ شد. نه، این کار را نمیکرد. نه اینجا، نه الآن. هنوز وقتش نرسیده بود. چرخید و با قدمهایی آرام اما مصمم، به سمت گروهی از دوستانش که در گوشه ی پارک ایستاده بودند، رفت. آنها هم مثل او نگاههایی تیز و شکارچی داشتند؛ نگاههایی که زیر نور ماه، درخششی غیرعادی داشت. یکی از آنها با پوزخندی گفت: « "و

8 Sept 2026, 14:47 UTC43 viewsread 18 September 2026

𑣲part13 𝓣𝓱𝓮 𝓶𝔂𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓾𝓼 𝓫𝓸𝔂 𝓱𝓪𝓭 𝓽𝓪𝓴𝓮𝓷 𝓪 𝓯𝓮𝔀 𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓹𝓼 𝓪𝔀𝓪𝔂 𝓯𝓻𝓸𝓶 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓽𝓻𝓮𝓮 𝔀𝓱𝓮𝓷 𝓼𝓾𝓭𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓵𝔂 𝓱𝓮 𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓹𝓹𝓮𝓭. 𝓗𝓲𝓼 𝓶𝔂𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓾𝓼 𝓼𝓶𝓲𝓵𝓮 𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓵𝓵 𝓱𝓾𝓷𝓰 𝓸𝓷 𝓱𝓲𝓼 𝓵𝓲𝓹𝓼, 𝓫𝓾𝓽 𝓱𝓲𝓼 𝓮𝔂𝓮𝓼 𝓯𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓭 𝓯𝓸𝓻 𝓪 𝓶𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽. 𝓝𝓸, 𝓱𝓮 𝔀𝓸𝓾𝓵𝓭𝓷'𝓽 𝓭𝓸 𝓲𝓽. 𝓝𝓸𝓽 𝓱𝓮𝓻𝓮, 𝓷𝓸𝓽 𝓷𝓸𝔀. 𝓣𝓱𝓮 𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓮 𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓷'𝓽 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓮 𝔂𝓮𝓽. 𝓗𝓮 𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓷𝓮𝓭 𝓪𝓷𝓭, 𝔀𝓲𝓽𝓱 𝓬𝓪𝓵𝓶 𝓫𝓾𝓽 𝓭𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓮𝓭 𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓼, 𝔀𝓪𝓵𝓴𝓮𝓭 𝓽𝓸𝔀𝓪𝓻𝓭 𝓱𝓲𝓼 𝓰𝓻𝓸𝓾𝓹 𝓸𝓯 𝓯𝓻𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓼 𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓲𝓷 𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓮𝓻 𝓸𝓯 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓴. 𝓣𝓱𝓮𝔂, 𝓽𝓸𝓸, 𝓱𝓪𝓭 𝓼𝓱𝓪𝓻𝓹, 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓭𝓪𝓽𝓸𝓻𝔂 𝓰𝓪𝔃𝓮𝓼—𝓰𝓪𝔃𝓮𝓼 𝓽𝓱𝓪𝓽 𝓱𝓮𝓵𝓭 𝓪𝓷 𝓾𝓷𝓷𝓪

7 Sept 2026, 12:13 UTC46 viewsread 18 September 2026
Photo

𝓜𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓼'𝓼 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲‌𝓬 𝓑𝓸𝔁

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Moonlit_Loove. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𑣲𝓜𝓸𝓸𝓷𝓵𝓲𝓽 𝓛𝓸𝓿𝓮” (@Moonlit_Loove), 16 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Moonlit_Loove.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.