The funniest thing to me about all the "repeal the 19th" dweebs is that they think voting republican is going to do something π€£π€£π€£ if anyone's right to vote should be taken its theirs. Naive retards.
π₯24π6π1

Channel
@MoonBloodandSoil
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
236subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001852846435 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MoonBloodandSoil |
| Description | Ethnocentric Ecocentric Feminism NOT RIGHT WING |
| Created | 31 December 2022 β measured β cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MoonBloodandSoil |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 236 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 236 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 October 2023 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 8 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
444 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ | 164 | 36.9% | |
| π | 145 | 32.7% | |
| π | 122 | 27.5% | |
| β€ | 13 | 2.93% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 444reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2023 to 24 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The funniest thing to me about all the "repeal the 19th" dweebs is that they think voting republican is going to do something π€£π€£π€£ if anyone's right to vote should be taken its theirs. Naive retards.
π₯24π6π1
Trannies are the most fucked up subhumans on the planet, confirmed Do not view this unless you have a strong tolerance to the most demonic behavior imaginable, but if you can help find this man's address please do. https://archive.ph/7lheg
π₯18
Photo, posted without a caption
π10π3
Everyone should just shut the fuck up about "muh birth rates" and focus on banning porn and human trafficking
π₯27π5π1
Lol
π16π₯5
The "female psychiatrist" in question is Nahlah Saimeh, an Arab woman running interference for her own race. All blame toward White women is accepted with no verification. White men have been embarrassingly susceptible to propaganda lies about White women.
π23β€4π₯1
Skinwalkers impersonating their wives @GenderDystopia
π₯8π5
Video, posted without a caption
π8
π€‘π€‘π€‘
π37
Male transoids want in women's restrooms. They say they "just want to pee", yet transoids masturbating in women's spaces is a whole porn category. They want in our hospital wards. They want to be the health care workers who provide intimate cleaning and care to your disabled grandmother or sister. They somehow admin 99% of online lesbian forums, apps for women, mothering forums; they join breastfeeding support grouβ¦
π14β€1
Photo, posted without a caption
π₯15π12π6
Photo, posted without a caption
π21
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MoonBloodandSoil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 584,940 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππ¬π¬π« π π©π¬π¬π‘ ππ«π‘ ππ¬π¦π©πβ (@MoonBloodandSoil), 236 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MoonBloodandSoil.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.