Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝑀𝑜𝑜𝑑:)𝑁~𝐴

Channel

𝑀𝑜𝑜𝑑:)𝑁~𝐴

@Mood_N_A

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

134subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004307480136
TypeChannel
Username@Mood_N_A
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 2 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Mood_N_A

Growth

134149141.58 August 2026 — 144 subscribers8 August 2026 — 149 subscribers8 August 2026 — 149 subscribers17 August 2026 — 134 subscribers8 August 202617 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 132–151 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 09:46134-15
8 Aug 2026, 20:16149no change
8 Aug 2026, 17:30149+5
8 Aug 2026, 02:16144first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.5%
avg views ÷ 134 subscribers
Avg views / post
23.5
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held12 (2 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total282
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥350.0%
233.3%
👏116.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC3 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

Cause all of the small things that you do Are what remind me why I fell for you And when we're apart and I'm missing you I close my eyes and all I see is you And the small things you do

8 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC6 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

آدم‌ها دنبالِ نیمه‌ی گمشده‌ی بی‌نقصشان می‌گردند. من اما تکه‌های شکسته‌ی خودم را جمع می‌کردم. پر از تَرَک‌هایی بودم که همیشه سعی در پنهان کردنشان داشتم. تو آمدی و به جای نادیده گرفتنِ این شکستگی‌ها، با انگشتانت خطِ تَرَک‌هایم را دنبال کردی. مثل هنرِ ژاپنیِ "کینتسوگی"، تو با طلا جای زخم‌هایم را پر کردی و به من فهماندی که یک روحِ ترمیم‌شده، زیباتر و باارزش‌تر از یک روحِ دست‌نخورده است. تو مرا "درست" نکردی؛ تو شکستگی‌های

7 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC42 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

_اگه ناراحتی، میخوای بخورمت؟ +هعی گوربا جان، اره بیا منو بخور! --- [ @Mood_N_A ]

7 Aug 2026, 05:34 UTC17 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

کلمات را فراموش کن. حتی لمس را هم. خطرناک‌ترین چیز درباره‌ی تو، نگاهت است. آن‌طور که از آن سوی اتاق نگاهم می‌کنی؛ یک گفتگوی خاموش که هیچکس جز ما دو نفر آن را نمی‌شنود. نگاهی که تمام سپرهای دفاعی‌ام را فرو می‌ریزد، از وعده‌ها و احتمالات حرف می‌زند و پوستم را بدون حتی یک تماس، به آتش می‌کشد. در همان یک نگاه، یک دنیای کامل از "ما" متولد می‌شود و من، با تمام وجود، در آن گم می‌شوم. می‌گویند خانه جاییست که در آن آرامش دا

6 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC19 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

می‌دانی، عشق تو مثل یک آهنگ پس‌زمینه برای زندگی‌ام شده. نه آنقدر بلند که حواسم را پرت کند، و نه آنقدر ضعیف که نشنومش. یک ملودیِ آرام و دائمی است که حتی در شلوغ‌ترین و سخت‌ترین روزها، در پسِ تمامِ افکارم جریان دارد و به من یادآوری می‌کند که تنها نیستم. تو آن آهنگی هستی که روحم با آن به آرامش می‌رسد و قلبم، ریتمش را از بَر است. --- [ @Mood_N_A ]

5 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC23 viewsread 8 August 2026

من همون گوزن وحشی بودم که دادم قله رو به دشت پروانه‌ها 🚶🏻🦋❤️‍🩹

5 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC24 viewsread 8 August 2026

دلتنگم ... دلتنگ خیلی چیزها ... دلتنگ این همه دلتنگی ها ... 🌧️ دلتنگ چیزهایی که بر من گذشت و هرگز باز نخواهد گشت ... دلتنگم ... دلتنگ نیمه شب های دلتنگی ... 🌙 دلتنگ این همه نبودن ها و دوری ها ... دلتنگ عهد هایی که کسی آن ها را نبست ... 🥀 دلتنگ تمام چیزهایی که می شد باشد و نیست و تمام هست هایی که نیست،حتی آنان که دلشان برایم تنگ نخواهد شد ... دلتنگ ترس از دست دادنت ... 💔 دلتنگ اون لحظاتی که هر لحظه برای تو می مُردم و

4 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC24 viewsread 8 August 2026

برگشتن از راهی که با ذوق رفتم ، بدترین چیزیه که تجربه کردم .

4 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC27 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

بعضی آدم‌ها وقتی می‌روند، یک جای خالی از خودشان به جا نمی‌گذارند. آن‌ها یک حفره به جا می‌گذارند. جای خالی را می‌شود با چیزی پر کرد، اما حفره را نه. حفره، نبودنِ خودِ تو را در درونت فریاد می‌زند. تو را از درون می‌بلعد و هر روز بزرگتر می‌شود. --- [ @Mood_N_A ]

3 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC37 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

تو لنگر من بودی. نه اینکه مرا در یک نقطه ثابت نگه داری؛ نه. تو آن وزنه‌ی امنی بودی که اجازه نمی‌داد در طوفان‌های زندگی، بیش از حد به این سو و آن سو پرتاب شوم. دنیا هرچقدر هم که متلاطم بود، من می‌دانستم که در نهایت، به یک نقطه‌ی امن و باثبات متصلم. می‌توانستم کمی دور شوم، کمی بچرخم، اما همیشه به تو برمی‌گشتم. حالا طناب پاره شده. من در این اقیانوسِ بی‌انتها سرگردانم. دیگر موج‌ها برایم رقصِ طبیعت نیستند؛ تهدیدی برای غ

1🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC35 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

اگه یه روز نبودم،بدون که یه‌دفعه نرفتم من مدت‌ها قبل از رفتنم توی سکوت خدافظی کرده بودم. همون وقتایی که دیگه مثل قبل حرف نمیزدم همون وقتایی که ناراحت میشدم و چیزی نمیگفتم همون لحظه‌هایی که منتظر بودم یکی بفهمه حالم خوب نیست ولی فقط خودم بودم و خودم. اگه یه روز نبودم فکر نکن برام مهم نبودی. اتفاقاً شاید زیادی مهم بودی برای همین این‌همه صبر کردم این‌همه نادیده گرفتم این‌همه سعی کردم چیزی خراب نشه ولی آدم یه جایی خسته م

👏1🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC25 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

می‌گفتند زمان همه چیز را حل می‌کند. دروغ می‌گفتند. زمان هیچ چیز را حل نمی‌کند؛ فقط درد را مثل یک شیء قیمتی، در یک موزه‌ی شیشه‌ای بایگانی می‌کند. زمان یک موزه‌دارِ بی‌رحم است که هر روز تو را مجبور می‌کند از مقابل ویترینِ خاطراتت عبور کنی. ویترینِ اولین دیدار. ویترینِ اولین "دوستت دارم". ویترینِ آن قهقهه‌ی از ته دل. ویترینِ آن دعوای تلخ... تو فقط می‌توانی نگاه کنی. از پشت شیشه‌ی سردِ "گذشته". حق دست زدن نداری. حق تغیی

1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Mood_N_A. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 456,432 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝑀𝑜𝑜𝑑:)𝑁~𝐴” (@Mood_N_A), 134 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mood_N_A.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.