Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ᴍᴏɴᴛᴇᴄᴀʀʟᴏ ʀᴇsᴘᴀᴄʜᴇᴢᴢ

Channel

ᴍᴏɴᴛᴇᴄᴀʀʟᴏ ʀᴇsᴘᴀᴄʜᴇᴢᴢ

@MontecarloRespachez

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

207subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003622783318
TypeChannel
Username@MontecarloRespachez
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MontecarloRespachez

Growth

207208207.510 Aug 2026, 05:31 — 208 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 23:32 — 207 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 05:3110 Aug 2026, 23:32
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 207–208 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 23:32207-1
10 Aug 2026, 05:31208first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.9%
avg views ÷ 207 subscribers
Avg views / post
30.9
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held18 (8 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total556
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC13 viewsread 10 August 2026

Битва ников финал ‼️ приз 50 зв 🎂 Sarix - ❤️ Herod - 👍 Amagan -😍 Montecarlov -😁 Meff -🔥 Cryoworks -🎉 хикверс -👏 Saxzz -😇 Салли -🤔 Era -🤯 Amir Ezzprime- 😈 Без звёзд Голос другу - https://t.me/+uZM1ub7MJvxlOTky

Signed Dima Montecarlo

8 Aug 2026, 21:54 UTC35 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Парни ебите сыну шлюхи лс пиздит акки у кентов не стыдясь при этом в том году украл у меня акк и почти развел кента. Скамит друзей и не только. Ебите ему лс "Ты сын шлюхи, от шадоу и кевина" @Xazerov

Signed 𝑺𝒉𝒂𝒅𝒐𝒘 𝑴𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒄𝒂𝒓𝒍𝒐̲

8 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTC42 viewsread 10 August 2026

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4pLfqVj/ ребят дайте пж актив под видосом

Signed ʙᴀʙᴇᴋ ᴍᴏɴᴛᴇᴄᴀʀʟᴏᴠ

8 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC20 viewsread 10 August 2026

Битва ников ‼️ приз 50 зв 🎂 Fansik -❤️ Sakido -🔥 Meff -👍 Montecarlov -😁 Coga -😎 Без звёзд онли голос Набрать минимум 5 голосов Голос другу- https://t.me/+uZM1ub7MJvxlOTky

Signed Dima Montecarlo

8 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTC34 viewsread 10 August 2026

ЗА РИЧАРДА ФУЛЛ ГАЗ

Signed ʙᴀʙᴇᴋ ᴍᴏɴᴛᴇᴄᴀʀʟᴏᴠ

8 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTC24 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ProjectTitlsPoll

Опрос на овнера СПБ 2/2

  1. Richard66%
  2. @pvpecst7%
  3. @pwavp8%
  4. @xakionov8%
  5. @oaplo7%
  6. @def_tigr25%
  7. @hvalil7%
  8. @kisa_Shendeazzov9%

The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed ʙᴀʙᴇᴋ ᴍᴏɴᴛᴇᴄᴀʀʟᴏᴠ

8 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC32 viewsread 10 August 2026

Если в это рил кто-то поверит то я ахуею

Signed ʙᴀʙᴇᴋ ᴍᴏɴᴛᴇᴄᴀʀʟᴏᴠ

8 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC34 viewsread 10 August 2026

Если меня и в правду снесут знайте я это так не оставлю и добуду больше улик а потом уже начнется реально все серьезно

Signed ʙᴀʙᴇᴋ ᴍᴏɴᴛᴇᴄᴀʀʟᴏᴠ

8 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC33 viewsread 10 August 2026

Абдул сказал что меня снесут

Signed ʙᴀʙᴇᴋ ᴍᴏɴᴛᴇᴄᴀʀʟᴏᴠ

8 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC30 viewsread 10 August 2026

Уже 2 тип который пишет мне

Signed ʙᴀʙᴇᴋ ᴍᴏɴᴛᴇᴄᴀʀʟᴏᴠ

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @MontecarloRespachez. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTCAnonymous Poll445 voters

Опрос на овнера СПБ 2/2

  1. Richard66%
  2. @pvpecst7%
  3. @pwavp8%
  4. @xakionov8%
  5. @oaplo7%
  6. @def_tigr25%
  7. @hvalil7%
  8. @kisa_Shendeazzov9%

The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 340,189 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ᴍᴏɴᴛᴇᴄᴀʀʟᴏ ʀᴇsᴘᴀᴄʜᴇᴢᴢ” (@MontecarloRespachez), 207 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MontecarloRespachez.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.