Montana Calls pinned a GIF

Channel
Montana Calls
@Montana_Call
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
306subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001666697031 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Montana_Call |
| Description | Here you find nice early SOL / BSC / ETH Gamble Plays. Ape at your owen and always DYOR and NFA! Owner: @AjeMontana80 @rogero80 Scouts: @frankrizzz Raid Lead Service: https://t.me/montana_soft_shilling Lounge: https://t.me/+bbZ7W7M33_ViYWM8 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Montana_Call |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:49 | 306 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:52 | 306 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.14%
- avg views ÷ 306 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 24.9
- 11 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 17
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 274 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈990
- Videos
- ≈181
- Links
- ≈1,710
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Boobs Coin https://dexscreener.com/solana/6tKBG6hv56Hfb3HZkRBpvXr7LtSMzqZ3gbNiDGDJBooB https://x.com/Boobiesbounty https://boobscoin.space/ NFA / DYOR
Montana Calls pinned a GIF
Kinda Chic HWzUC1x4WAyHjvKM9XtAxmd9PwNwjySgt4PXDN7opump https://x.com/i/communities/2028770781627613217 https://www.instagram.com/explore/search/keyword/?q=kinda%20chic NFA / DYOR
Montana Calls pinned a photo
OG Onigiri Aped this bullish OG CTO play. Name is hyped atm and team behind seems good and want push this on the organic way for longerterm. So this is not a pnd or hours play. This is a play for ape and hold for some days maybe weeks. MC 30K BDEvSn6Lbj6fKUQ7VsLj4szm8qUX2bWTxgjtHMjsxEH9 https://t.me/ONIGIRICOIN Always dyor
Got a bullish OG play
Montana Calls pinned a photo
Schrödinger Elon Cat ($DINGER) Following cat meta. Mentioned by elon many times, $DINGER is here to make cat season great again. https://t.me/Elonscat_dinger https://x.com/schrodinger_pf https://dexscreener.com/solana/ba7hjcn2bnyeadshbj3j9rpaz12w1mtg9ercybdysyhf 2MrAtKmtsk8PhSpBHYhXFqEJz8Erp5CAt28y27iKpump Always dyor
Got a bullish Cat play
The Argentinian GOAT Buy! 🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷 🔀 Spent $49.14 (0.646 SOL) 🔀 Got 1,174,031 MESSI 👤 Buyer / TX 🪙 New Holder 💸 Market Cap $41,579 DexT | Screener | Buy | Trending
Montana Calls pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Montana_Call. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,023,522 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Montana Calls” (@Montana_Call), 306 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Montana_Call.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.