Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Monetizator.pro кейсы

Channel

Monetizator.pro кейсы

@Monetizator_pro_cases

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

20subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001440788193
TypeChannel
Username@Monetizator_pro_cases
CreatedBetween 1 March 2019 and 21 March 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Monetizator_pro_cases

Growth

202120.56 August 2026 — 21 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20 subscribers6 August 202624 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 17 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20–21 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 00:5220-1
11 Aug 2026, 13:4621no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:2021first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 21 March 2019the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 October 2020. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

9 Dec 2019, 00:19 UTC200 viewsread 11 August 2026

Интересный кейс, на монетизацию пришли уже с отличными показателями по доходности 461р/1000уников и в целом с отличным развесом. Долго думали, что можем тут усилить и сможем ли не увеличивая особо количество блоков. Было принято решение оттестировать на финале Программатик 2.0, который был еще в закрытой бете на момент заявки. Учитывая, что весь доход был с Adsense. В ходе тестов выяснилось, что Adsense действительн

5 Jul 2019, 08:15 UTC298 viewsread 11 August 2026

Исходники без фотошопа смотрите в группе ВК, сгрупировали для удобства в телеграм.

5 Jul 2019, 08:14 UTC307 viewsread 11 August 2026

Кейс по одному из наших самых сложных и интересных проектов. Сайт к нам попал с доходом 371р на 1000 уников, что весьма достойно, над монетизацией там постарались до нас. Была поставлена задача сделать минимум 420р. Проанализировав проект, были обнаружены блоки ссылок в количестве 3 блока, которые давали 20% дохода. Так же была задача убрать из первого экрана 2 блока рекламы. Были строгие требования по форматам и

17 Jun 2019, 18:08 UTCviews —

Monetizator.pro кейсы pinned «Приветствуем вебмастер! Для удобства разбили всю полезную инфу по чатам. @monetizator_pro - здесь основная движуха, чатик для общения и не только. @monetizator_pro_news - интересуют новости и заметки по монетизации? Тогда тебе сюда! @monetizator_pro_cases…»

17 Jun 2019, 18:08 UTC172 viewsread 11 August 2026

Приветствуем вебмастер! Для удобства разбили всю полезную инфу по чатам. @monetizator_pro - здесь основная движуха, чатик для общения и не только. @monetizator_pro_news - интересуют новости и заметки по монетизации? Тогда тебе сюда! @monetizator_pro_cases – хочешь увидеть наши кейсы? Они все тут! @monetizator_pro_reviews – ну и конечно отзывы о нашей работе, собрали все тут. Так же у нас есть группа в ВК https://vk

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Monetizator_pro_cases. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Monetizator.pro кейсы” (@Monetizator_pro_cases), 20 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Monetizator_pro_cases.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.