Channel
@Mondengell
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
98subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002828135058 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Mondengell |
| Description | Рисую все, что пожелается. Восстанавливаюсь после 10-ти летнего артблока. Милости прошу, к моему шалашу❤️🔥 https://boosty.to/mondengel |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Mondengell |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 98 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 98 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 27 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
128 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 94 | 73.4% | |
| custom 5418149897293542801 | 16 | 12.5% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 5.47% | |
| 🌭 | 5 | 3.91% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 2.34% | |
| custom 5377602816154019156 | 1 | 0.781% | |
| custom 6328074912640534314 | 1 | 0.781% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.781% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 19 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Mondengell. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 March 2026 to 19 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Заебалась рисовать пистолет. Основные цвета наложены, осталось рендерить😭 Как же я боюсь рендерить, для меня это как русская рулетка. Что получится, то получится. Как хорошо было бы шарить в цвете..😭 #Процесс
❤7
Опять завозик, из сранья выбираем более наилучшую получившуюся. Скиллочек пассивно так сказать растет, поэтому я решила вспомнить Эллиота (Пицца бойчик) и нарисовать со своими новыми навыками, уже вижу как сильно отличается со старыми рисунками🚬 (У него руки такие душибельные получаются😏. Собственно вся проработка на них) #Процесс
🔥7❤3custom 53776028161540191561custom 54181498972935428011custom 63280749126405343141
Как ощущается играть в на 2 на 8 за Вескера и Стрелка. По любимому шипу Берца🍒 (Каждая катка чпоканье) #deadbydaylight
❤13
Вспоминаем, что кроме дбд существует мой тгк🚬 Держите Вескера На чилле, на расслабоне😏 #арт #albertwesker #residentevil
❤10
Пока что жеска ленюсь. Держите процесс Вескера, вспомнила про планшет. У меня какой-то конченный гиперфикс на дбд пошел, сижу в нем 24/7. Когда-нибудь меня отпустит эта помойка в которой уже сижу почти 10 лет перерывами🚬 #Процесс #albertwesker
❤9🍌1
И сама работа со сломанного планшета <3 #арт #сломанныйпланшет
custom 54181498972935428018
🤩 розовая ветка 🤩 📜https://t.me/kantairisc 📜https://t.me/Ren_Ren_LOL 📜https://t.me/Mondengell 📜https://t.me/nikmimiko 📜https://t.me/UntitledExpression 📜https://t.me/FurrHouse_NSFW 📜https://t.me/riokichii 📜https://t.me/hornydothole 📜https://t.me/l1_s4_ny4 📜📜https://t.me/gofgaf ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿
❤3
Прикольно смотреть, как по итогу вышло. Моя 3 по счету
❤4
Урааа выложили результаты сломанного планшета
❤3
Хорни сломанный планшет аж на 40 участников! 2 с половиной месяца длился этот ивент, (а мог закончиться вообще в марте следующего года), если бы мы не разделились на 4 ветки, которые рисовали параллельно по блюру моей картиночки. И кто это были: 💗розовая ветка: один два три четыре пять шесть семь восемь девять десять 💙голубая ветка: один два три четыре пять шесть семь восемь девять десять 💜фиолетовая ветка: один…
❤4
Учусь дрочить анимки в тунсквиде. Пол меме уже сделала. Пока все идет хорошо🚬 #процесс #анимация
❤10
Вескер посоветовал попробовать надеть одежду Джилл, но что-то пошло не по плану… Так даже лучше🍒 #art #residentevil #chrisredfield #albertwesker #jillvalentine
🌭5custom 54181498972935428011
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Mondengell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 545,685 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mondengel 18+” (@Mondengell), 98 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mondengell.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.