Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Just Monday.

@MondayDark

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

420subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002356776042
TypeChannel
Username@MondayDark
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MondayDark

Growth

420421420.58 Aug 2026, 02:49 — 421 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 05:31 — 421 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 18:58 — 420 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 02:498 Aug 2026, 18:58
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 420–421 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 18:58420-1
8 Aug 2026, 05:31421no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:49421first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
64.8%
avg views ÷ 420 subscribers
Avg views / post
272
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
22.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held16 (13 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total1,088
Reactions total241
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

422 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 543638694690766501717341.0%
custom 53706907964355795758921.1%
🐳7918.7%
custom 52738886588548003754510.7%
custom 5298556124914538940194.50%
👾174.03%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 422reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MondayDark. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC133 views64 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сенифеди 🫶🫶|#MonArt

🐳41custom 527388865885480037514custom 53706907964355795757👾2

29 Jul 2026, 11:10 UTC256 views62 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ярик Гудбоевич #хпрщ | #MonArt

custom 537069079643557957537custom 527388865885480037514custom 52985561249145389409🐳2

22 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC311 views61 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Лопоухий 🙂|#MonArt

custom 537069079643557957544custom 52738886588548003759👾5🐳3

16 Jul 2026, 12:01 UTC388 views54 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Понравилась версия одного художника, где старшая медсестра могла бы быть козочкой. 🙂|#MonArt

custom 543638694690766501741🐳7custom 52985561249145389403custom 52738886588548003752custom 53706907964355795751

14 Jul 2026, 11:09 UTC380 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Очень крутая Соник художница

custom 54363869469076650178

14 Jul 2026, 11:01 UTC378 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Создатель хайпа кстати

custom 54363869469076650177

14 Jul 2026, 10:09 UTC374 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Боже обожаю работы Дюка

custom 54363869469076650179

14 Jul 2026, 10:07 UTC390 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Грикки я помню ещё с совместного коллаба, люблю твоих крпк и тебя в принципе

custom 543638694690766501710

14 Jul 2026, 10:04 UTC379 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ем эти работы на полдник, художницу на десерт.

custom 54363869469076650179

14 Jul 2026, 10:03 UTC412 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Рад наблюдать что Курага развивается и растет, роднуля🙄

custom 54363869469076650179🐳1

14 Jul 2026, 10:02 UTC359 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Краска как всегда радует, причем уже давно

custom 543638694690766501710🐳1

14 Jul 2026, 10:02 UTC338 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вкусно. Реально хочу есть.

custom 54363869469076650179

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @MondayDark. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,015,204 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Just Monday.” (@MondayDark), 420 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MondayDark.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.