Channel
@MoloWarMonitor
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
139subscribers
+43 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003889927410 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MoloWarMonitor |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MoloWarMonitor |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 139 | +7 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:39 | 132 | +5 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 127 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 128 | +14 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 114 | +14 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:28 | 100 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 96 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:49 | 96 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
21 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5 | 23.8% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 19.0% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 19.0% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 14.3% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 9.52% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 9.52% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Kan News: "Towards escalation or agreement?" Channel 13: "The IDF is preparing to act alone in Iran." It is clear that the atmosphere is shifting, and significant decisions regarding Iran could be made in the coming hours. In all likelihood, following the recent, and far from reassuring, Iranian statements concerning the Strait of Hormuz, both Israel and the U.S. have realized they face a choice between going all-…
👀2
Reports of several blasts heard on Qeshm Island, southern Iran. Most likely anti-ship cruise missile launches towards the Strait of Hormuz.
🔥1
After about 20 days during which Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar was completely devoid of USAF aircraft, a single C-17A can be seen parked there today on Sentinel-2 satellite imagery, 06/08/2026. If more aircraft appear in the coming days, it could indicate that the U.S. is not planning to attack Iran in the near future.
👀2
Massive demolitions are being carried out by the IDF in Al-Mansouri, southern Lebanon. Evacuation warnings were issued yesterday.
🤬2
Photo shows the launch of ballistic missiles from Sanaa, Yemen. The target is likely Saudi Arabia, but it could also be an anti-ship missile launch towards the Red Sea.
Reports of a ballistic missile launch from North Korea, most likely towards the East Sea.
According to my sources, Israeli PM Netanyahu and Defense Minister Katz are currently holding a cabinet meeting over the incident in Lebanon, which led to the death of several IDF soldiers. The military is requesting the implementation of a "sensitive operation" that requires political-level approval. It is therefore highly likely that today's attacks against Hezbollah were merely a prelude and that the Israeli res…
❤1
The Greek-owned bulk carrier "Minoan Pioneer" can be seen leaking oil in the Strait of Hormuz on Sentinel-2 satellite imagery, 05/08/2026. It was trying to transit the strait under US-escort through the Omani side, before being struck by Iran. 📍Coordinates: 26.45935, 56.53788
👍2👏1
To try to patch over this situation, several USAF C-17A aircraft have recently transported cargo, primarily from bases in Japan and South Korea, to the Middle East. In all likelihood, these flights were carrying THAAD and Patriot air defense batteries and missiles. While this may serve as a temporary fix for dwindling stockpiles, for China, this would be the perfect moment to attack Taiwan.
My previous analysis was just confirmed by CNN, in fact the U.S. military has depleted nearly 80% of its THAAD missile interceptors since the start of the operation "Epic Fury" back in February. This is the real reason why President Trump found himself forced to call off the new escalation promised last week. Pentagon officials warned him repeatedly in recent weeks that the low ADs stockpiles could carry serious co…
According to my sources, the Syrian Armed Forces have entered a state of maximum alert after receiving threats from PMU forces in Iraq to attack Syria. Syrian military reinforcements have been reported along the border.
President Trump has given Iran until Tuesday to open the Strait of Hormuz or face "devastating" airstrikes, according to Bloomberg. "I want to give them every last chance before decapitation...You'll find out today or tomorrow," he told reporters yesterday night.
🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @MoloWarMonitor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MoloWarMonitor — MWM” (@MoloWarMonitor), 139 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MoloWarMonitor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.