Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for شوریده | محمد جواد خسروی

Channel

شوریده | محمد جواد خسروی

@Mohammadjavadkhosravi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

430subscribers

+24 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002254310069
TypeChannel
Username@Mohammadjavadkhosravi
CreatedBetween 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Mohammadjavadkhosravi

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

405430417.56 August 2026 — 406 subscribers6 August 2026 — 406 subscribers6 August 2026 — 407 subscribers13 August 2026 — 405 subscribers20 August 2026 — 413 subscribers27 August 2026 — 410 subscribers5 September 2026 — 414 subscribers13 September 2026 — 430 subscribers6 August 202613 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 38 days, net +24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 401–434 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 07:57430+16
5 Sept 2026, 01:58414+4
27 Aug 2026, 21:08410-3
20 Aug 2026, 01:36413+8
13 Aug 2026, 01:47405-2
6 Aug 2026, 21:31407+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:33406no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:32406first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

175 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13577.1%
👍2011.4%
👏126.86%
👌63.43%
🙏21.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 175 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 February 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 22:25 UTC164 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ضمن تشکر از شما عزیزان بابت اعتمادتان به من، با توجه به تکمیل ظرفیت گروه اول، گروه دوم از هم اکنون قابل نام نویسی است به همکارانم پیام دهید 🙏👇 @ajavanadmin

👍2

Signed Mohammad Javad Khosravi

26 Jul 2026, 09:48 UTC191 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Voice message

▪️ او بدون خداحافظی رفت پس بر میگردد ▪️این یک صوت کوتاه است که باهدف ارائه یک پاسخ کوتاه به پرسش فوق ضبط شده است. #صوتک #صوت_کوتاه #محمدجوادخسروی #محمد_جواد_خسروی @mohammadjavadkhosravi

👍2

Signed Mohammad Javad Khosravi

26 Jul 2026, 07:45 UTC180 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

[1] شناخت انسان نیازمند فهم نظریه های بنیادین در روانشناسی است. ما برای نگریستن به انسان، به چشم های نظریه پردازان احتیاج داریم. [2]من تصمیم گرفتم یک دوره آموزشی با چهار ویژگی شامل بخش بخش بودن، کم هزینه بودن، نگاه ریشه ای و عمیق به انسان داشتن، مبتنی بر کتب دست اول بودن طراحی کنم تا بتونم سه هدف که شامل تسلط بر دانش نظری، فهم شخصیت انسان از دیدگاه نظریه پردازان و تسلط بر مبانی درمان های روانشناختی را محقق کنم [3]د

2

Signed Mohammad Javad Khosravi

23 Jul 2026, 20:44 UTC242 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Voice message

▪️ من کلی کتاب می خوانم و دوره آموزشی شرکت کردم اما چرا تغییر های بزرگ توی زندگیم اتفاق نمی افته؟! ▪️این یک صوت کوتاه است که باهدف ارائه یک پاسخ کوتاه به پرسش فوق ضبط شده است. #صوتک #صوت_کوتاه #محمدجوادخسروی #محمد_جواد_خسروی @mohammadjavadkhosravi

7👏2

Signed Mohammad Javad Khosravi

23 Jul 2026, 12:28 UTC247 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

#پیشنهاد_مطالعه 📚مجموعه آثار یونگ 📌پ.ن: کتاب جز محتوای دسترسی آزاد است و موسسه زوریخ آن را به رایگان در اختیار علاقمندان قرار داده است 📌شرح: این روزها بسیاری از افراد پیرامون یونگ سخن می‌گویند، اکثر یادگیری ما از یونگ بر اساس روایت هاست و نه مطالعه دقیق و اصولی، لذا کسی که ادعای روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگی دارد باید یکبار این مجموعه را خوانده باشد. 📌آغاز مطالعه بهمن ۱۳۹۹ - پایان مطالعه فروردین ۱۴۰۵ (البته در این بین ک

8

Signed Mohammad Javad Khosravi

14 Jul 2026, 17:46 UTC337 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

#پیشنهاد_مطالعه 📚The Discovery of the Unconscious 🖋️النبرگ 📌پ.ن: کتاب جز محتوای دسترسی آزاد است 📌شرح: اگر واقعا به دنبال یک کتاب اصولی و البته ارزشمند هستید که ناهشیار را از منظر دانشمندانی چون یونگ، فروید و.... مقایسه کند، قطعا کتاب النبرگ جز بهترین هاست. این کتاب ارزش خواندن را دارد. https://t.me/Mohammadjavadkhosravi

10

Signed Mohammad Javad Khosravi

11 Jul 2026, 18:33 UTC341 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Voice message

▪️ چرا میخواهیم قربانی باشیم؟! ▪️این یک صوت کوتاه است که باهدف ارائه یک پاسخ کوتاه به پرسش فوق ضبط شده است. #صوتک #صوت_کوتاه #محمدجوادخسروی #محمد_جواد_خسروی @mohammadjavadkhosravi

15

Signed Mohammad Javad Khosravi

25 Jun 2026, 11:06 UTC429 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

پست بعدی را شما انتخاب کنید

  1. چرا ما خوب نمی‌شویم (چرا ترجیح میدهم قربانی باشیم؟)73%
  2. چرا تمایل به سکس های متنوع داریم؟!27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Mohammad Javad Khosravi

24 Jun 2026, 11:19 UTC514 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

والدین عقب تر از فرزندان [1] در تاریخ همواره والد بودن با دو موضوع همراه بوده است اول اینکه والد کسی است که صاحب قدرت (قدرت اقتصادی و مرجعیت) و توان اثر گذاری است دوم به دلیل اینکه دارای گستره ارتباطی بیشتری است احتمالا اطلاعات بیشتری دارد [2] اما امروزه مورد دوم یعنی داشتن اطلاعات بیشتر به دلیل سرعت تکنولوژی و ناتوانی والدین برای استفاده از تکنولوژی از بین رفته است. و فرزندان به دلیل توان بیشتر برای استفاده از تکن

👍84👌1

Signed Mohammad Javad Khosravi

19 Jun 2026, 22:57 UTC399 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026

📌 خرده مرگ [1] تا به حال تجربه این را داشتید که شغلی را دوست نداشته باشید و آن را ادامه دهید و یا فردی را نامناسب برای خودتان بدانید اما توان قطع کردن رابطه را نداشته باشید؟! [2] جناب اروین یالوم در کتاب روان درمانی اگزیستانسیال که در فارسی نیز توسط بانو گرانقدر سپیده حبیب ترجمه شده است بیان میکند که ما همواره از مرگ می‌ترسیم و بسیار هم می‌ترسیم، چرا که مرگ تمام کننده تمام آن چیزی است که ما ساخته ایم. مرگ نقطه پایا

18👌5👏2

Signed Mohammad Javad Khosravi

6 Jun 2026, 19:57 UTC425 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

#پیشنهاد_مطالعه 📚تک همسری 🖋️آدام فیلیپس(روانکاو بریتانیایی) پ.ن: کتاب با اجازه ناشر به صورت رایگان در دسترس قرار داده شده است. https://t.me/Mohammadjavadkhosravi

12

Signed Mohammad Javad Khosravi

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Mohammadjavadkhosravi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Jun 2026, 11:06 UTCAnonymous Poll66 voters

پست بعدی را شما انتخاب کنید

  1. چرا ما خوب نمی‌شویم (چرا ترجیح میدهم قربانی باشیم؟)73%
  2. چرا تمایل به سکس های متنوع داریم؟!27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 February 2026 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“شوریده | محمد جواد خسروی” (@Mohammadjavadkhosravi), 430 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mohammadjavadkhosravi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.