Channel
@ModuDAO_ANN
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
719subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002852258191 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ModuDAO_ANN |
| Description | ModuDAO는 특정 전문가나 소수가 아닌, 누구나 참여하고 함께 운영하는 탈중앙화 조직입니다. 공지채널 : https://t.me/ModuDAO_ANN 채팅방 : https://t.me/Modu_DAO 트위터 : https://x.com/Modudao0707 DAO 멤버 텔레그램 : https://t.me/addlist/6N8TfDd0C_k0ZjBl |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ModuDAO_ANN |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 719 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 719 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 7 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (7 May 2026 – 20 July 2026) |
| Views total | 311 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
21 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 57.1% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 23.8% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 14.3% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌐 주간 채팅 활성화 이벤트 안내 주간 채팅 이벤트를 진행합니다! 매주 목표 채팅량을 달성하고 다양한 보상을 받아가세요 🎁 🗓 이벤트 기간 🟡1주차: 7월 20일 ~ 7월 26일 🟡2주차: 7월 27일 ~ 8월 2일 🟡3주차: 8월 3일 ~ 8월 9일 🟡4주차: 8월 10일 ~ 8월 16일 🎯 참여 조건 ✅매주 채팅 채널 누적 채팅량 300회+ 달성 ✅ 기간 동안 5회 이상 채팅 참여자 대상 🎁 주간 보상 🍗 치킨 기프티콘 × 2명 ☕️ 커피 기프티콘 × 10명 ⚠️ 주의사항 의미 없는 도배, AI를 이용한 채팅 등 부적합 활동이 확인될 경우 이벤트 참여 자격이 박탈될 수 있습니다. 공정한 이벤트 운영을 위해 운영진 판단에 따라 제외될 수 있습니다. 많은 참여 부탁드립니다! 🚀
🎮 Play Limitless 오픈! LoL 경기 맞히고 고사양 게이밍 PC, 백화점 상품권 받자 이길 팀만 맞히면 고사양 게이밍 PC까지. 참가비 0원, 완전 무료 🙌 🗓 기간 6/6 ~ 7/12 (MSI 결승까지) ▶️ 참여 방법 1️⃣ playlimitless.games 접속 2️⃣ 그날 경기 결과 예측 3️⃣ 맞힐수록 점수·랭킹 쑥쑥 🏆 보상은 두 갈래 🎯 예측 랭킹 (롤잘알 코스) 적중 점수로 순위! 상위권엔 진짜 좋은 게이밍템 └ 고사양 게이밍 PC · RTX 5070 · 240Hz 게이밍 모니터 · 게이밍 키보드+마우스 · MSI 진출 팀 공식 굿즈 · 치킨·커피 🔗 친구 초대 · SNS 응원 (게임 몰라도 OK) 친구 데려오고 응원하면 누구나 받는 실물 상품권 └ 백화점 상품권 80만 · 올리브영 · 배민·편의점 상품권…
❤2
🌐Limitless 6월 이벤트 오픈 🎉 💬 채팅 이벤트 Limitless Emoji 를 표기한 후 채팅방에서 활동해주세요. 열심히 활동해주신 분들을 추첨하여 선물을 드립니다. 🎁 에어팟 1명 🍗 치킨 5명 ☕️ 커피 30명 🟡Limitless Emoji 추가하기 🟡텔레그램 프리미엄 사용자가 아니신 경우 다음과 같은 닉네임 표기로 이벤트에 참여하실 수 있습니다. 1️⃣닉네임 + 🌐 2️⃣닉네임 + 🌐 3️⃣닉네임 + Limitless♾️ 🗓 6월 16일 - 7월 15일, 발표 7월 16일
💵 한국금거래소 RWA 'KGLD' X 이벤트 국내 최대 금 거래소 '한국금거래소'와 '아이티센 그룹'이 추진하는 진짜 실물 금 100% 연동 RWA 프로젝트 KGLD 딱 30초 투자하고 에어팟, 치킨, 커피 받아 가세요! 🚩 참여 방법 1️⃣[@korda_Official] X 팔로우 2️⃣이벤트 게시물 [RT + 좋아요 + 댓글] 3️⃣폼에 X 핸들 제출 🎁 경품 안내 🎧 에어팟 (1명) 🍗 치킨 기프티콘 (15명) ☕️ 커피 기프티콘 (200명) 🗓기간 ~ 2026.07.14까지 ✨발표 - 7/14부터 순차 발송
❤2
https://www.aitimes.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=211536 이전부터 해킹 관련해서 미토스 얘기 많이 나오고, 일반 유저도 사용할 수 있는 ‘페이블 5’가 나옴. 실제 유저들 체감으로는 효용성이 떨어지는게 일단 취약점 찾는게 ‘야 찾아줘’ 하나로 가능한게 안됨. + 어차피 이런 LLM 모델들은 가드레일이 잘 되어있어서 일반 사람들이 불순한 의도로 쓰는 것 자체가 불가능 그리고 미토스급이 아니라 미토스 자체가 나오더라도 그걸 활용해서 해킹에 쓸 수 있는 사람은 아주 극히 제한적일듯?
✅ 하우스파티 프로토콜? 이건 아이언맨3에 나오는거 아닌가🧐 로다주가 만든 지구방위 아이언맨들 폭죽으로 쓰던…
5월 이벤트 당첨을 축하드립니다. 당첨되신분들은 @Hanstogether 로 DM 부탁드립니다. 마감일 6월 12일까지 곧 추가이벤트 준비드리겠습니다 :) 🎁 에어팟 @soeolinyoung 🍗 치킨 @dn0574 @lelepepe_0 @haveadream7 @bongdidi @yeemmsa ☕️ 커피 @hihihi111999 @simsimh @mch162 @misty2318 @haposoul @jjang0123 @ocean4827 @mandaringga @randolf4 @tiredsleep38820 @sohomore @soosung2 @sunginlee @gibsa4266 @h_marketing_partner @gohwea5445 @shadow7806 @dhl1013 @younge0703 @helfire98 @young7000 @k…
❤4
코인 조정장이나 하락장으로는 안본다. 장례식장으로 보는중 🪦
😱3😢1
🌐 Limitless에 사용자 생성 마켓(UGM)이 출시되었습니다. 이제 누구나 직접 예측 마켓을 만들 수 있습니다. ✔️ 자산 선택 ✔️ 결과 선택 ✔️ 마켓 생성 내가 만든 마켓에서 거래가 발생하면, 거래 수수료의 일부를 보상으로 받을 수 있습니다. 🔥 기존에는 플랫폼이 마켓을 만들었다면, 이제는 유저가 직접 마켓을 만들고 수익까지 얻을 수 있는 구조입니다. 🔗 마켓 만들기: limitless.is/ugm
🌐$LMTS 시즌 3 클레임이 시작되었습니다. 시즌 3는 지금까지 가장 규모가 컸던 시즌이며, 이번 에어드롭 역시 역대 최대 규모로 진행됩니다. 기록적인 시즌에 맞춰, 전체 $LMTS 공급량의 3%가 트레이더 보상용으로 할당되었습니다. 🌐클레임하기
❤1
미국주식 다시 진입한지 2주차 코인불장때보다 쉬운듯(?)
🔥 가상자산 과세, 혹시 포기하고 계셨나요? 그동안 "어차피 세금 때릴 텐데 뭔 청원이냐...", "국회가 우리 말 듣겠냐" 하면서 반쯤 포기하고 계셨죠? 아직 판 흔들기 가능합니다. 지난 13일에 올라온 '가상자산 과세폐지 청원'이 일주일 만에 벌써 4만 3천 명 돌파! 국회 정식 회부되는 5만 명까지 딱 6천 명 남은상태, 87% 채웠습니다. 코인으로 치면 이거 지금 상장 빔 쏘기 직전!! 🤬 저도 포기했었던 적이 있습니다. 국장, 미장이랑 비교하면 너무 불공평했어요. 주식은 공제 한도 퍼주고, 코인만 연 250만 원! 쥐꼬리 공제에 세율 22%(지방세 포함) 때린다? 이거 대놓고 코인러들 호구 잡겠다는 소리. 이월 결손금 공제도 없음... 물려서 번 돈 다 까먹고 겨우 멘징했는데, 그다음 해에 좀 벌었다고 세금 다 뜯어…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ModuDAO_ANN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 735,472 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ModuDAO 공지” (@ModuDAO_ANN), 719 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ModuDAO_ANN.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.