Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Raqam Tanlash Xizmati

Channel

Raqam Tanlash Xizmati

@Mobioperator

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,542subscribers

-286 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001263354183
TypeChannel
Username@Mobioperator
Created23 January 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/Mobioperator

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@raqamtanlashxizmati/84305 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC@Mobioperator/23533 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@raqamtanlashxizmati/84325 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC@Mobioperator/23535 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@Mobioperator/23541 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC@raqamtanlashxizmati/84386 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC1.00under a minute
@Mobioperator/23544 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC@raqamtanlashxizmati/84416 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC1.00under a minute
@raqamtanlashxizmati/84436 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC@Mobioperator/23546 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC1.00under a minute
@Mobioperator/23547 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC@raqamtanlashxizmati/84446 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@raqamtanlashxizmati28 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@raqamtanlashxizmati (28–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 23 of the 28 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 29 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @Mobioperator — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

6,5426,8286,6856 August 2026 — 6,828 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,828 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,825 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,801 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,782 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,738 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,714 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,691 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,677 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,682 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,678 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,663 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,653 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,637 subscribers16 September 2026 — 6,621 subscribers2 October 2026 — 6,561 subscribers9 October 2026 — 6,542 subscribers6 August 20269 October 2026
17 measurements spanning 64 days, net -286. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,499–6,871 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Oct 2026, 10:176,542-19
2 Oct 2026, 16:176,561-60
16 Sept 2026, 22:006,621-16
13 Sept 2026, 06:016,637-16
9 Sept 2026, 13:356,653-10
4 Sept 2026, 08:156,663-15
31 Aug 2026, 13:136,678-4
28 Aug 2026, 09:056,682+5
25 Aug 2026, 18:536,677-14
22 Aug 2026, 23:476,691-23
19 Aug 2026, 12:126,714-24
16 Aug 2026, 08:146,738-44
12 Aug 2026, 18:546,782-19
9 Aug 2026, 14:136,801-24
6 Aug 2026, 20:206,825-3
6 Aug 2026, 15:006,828no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:536,828first reading

Engagement

113 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 113 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1083.3%
👀18.33%
🙈18.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 113 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 113 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 04:49 UTC71 viewsread 20 August 2026

┌ 🟣 Ucell ├ 🇺🇿 Доставка: Bepul ├ 👩‍💻 @raqamtanlashxizmati407 ├ 📞 994074444 | 559030202 └ 🤖 @raqamtanlashbot 24/7 🟢 Online shoshilamiz | Narxi 1. 50 870 5959 - 50 000 so'm 2. 93 096 5959 - 50 000 so'm 👉 Ja'mi raqamlar ro'yxati ⏬👇Tanlang👇⏬

20 Aug 2026, 04:48 UTC74 viewsread 20 August 2026

┌ 🟣 Ucell ├ 🇺🇿 Доставка: Bepul ├ 👩‍💻 @raqamtanlashxizmati407 ├ 📞 994074444 | 559030202 └ 🤖 @raqamtanlashbot 24/7 🟢 Online shoshilamiz | Narxi 1. 50 979 6262 - 50 000 so'm 👉 Ja'mi raqamlar ro'yxati ⏬👇Tanlang👇⏬

20 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC122 viewsread 20 August 2026

┌ 🔵 Uzmobile | 🔥 ├ 🇺🇿 Yetkazib berish: Bepul ├ 👩‍💻 Operator ├ 📞 994074444 | 559030202 └ 🤖 @raqamtanlashbot 24/7 👉 Barcha raqamlar ro'yxati Raqam | Narxi 1. 95 333 3272 — 180 000 so'm 2. 99 801 1968 — 99 000 so'm 3. 99 349 7007 — 700 000 so'm 4. 99 514 3474 — 99 000 so'm 5. 95 335 5565 — 270 000 so'm 6. 70 320 0737 — 150 000 so'm 7. 99 097 9496 — 99 000 so'm 8. 99 222 2746 — 180 000 so'm 9. 70 225 2…

19 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC300 viewsread 20 August 2026

┌ 🔵 Uzmobile | 🔥 ├ 🇺🇿 Yetkazib berish: Bepul ├ 👩‍💻 Operator ├ 📞 994074444 | 559030202 └ 🤖 @raqamtanlashbot 24/7 👉 Barcha raqamlar ro'yxati Raqam | Narxi 1. 99 999 8052 — 200 000 so'm 2. 95 922 2622 — 350 000 so'm 3. 95 557 5573 — 200 000 so'm 4. 99 504 5434 — 99 000 so'm 5. 99 171 1114 — 500 000 so'm 6. 99 574 2626 — 270 000 so'm 7. 70 066 6618 — 150 000 so'm 8. 99 205 5559 — 200 000 so'm 9. 95 747…

19 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC312 viewsread 20 August 2026

┌ 🔵 Uzmobile | 🔥 ├ 🇺🇿 Yetkazib berish: Bepul ├ 👩‍💻 Operator ├ 📞 994074444 | 559030202 └ 🤖 @raqamtanlashbot 24/7 👉 Barcha raqamlar ro'yxati Raqam | Narxi 1. 99 460 8696 — 99 000 so'm 2. 99 760 6046 — 99 000 so'm 3. 99 937 4524 — 99 000 so'm 4. 95 857 5557 — 270 000 so'm 5. 99 944 4548 — 150 000 so'm 6. 99 359 2969 — 99 000 so'm 7. 99 801 2924 — 99 000 so'm 8. 99 040 6600 — 500 000 so'm 9. 95 545 552…

19 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC335 viewsread 20 August 2026

┌ 🔵 Uzmobile | 🔥 ├ 🇺🇿 Yetkazib berish: Bepul ├ 👩‍💻 Operator ├ 📞 994074444 | 559030202 └ 🤖 @raqamtanlashbot 24/7 👉 Barcha raqamlar ro'yxati Raqam | Narxi 1. 95 040 0450 — 200 000 so'm 2. 99 130 3311 — 500 000 so'm 3. 95 555 8402 — 180 000 so'm 4. 99 470 8383 — 270 000 so'm 5. 99 760 8121 — 99 000 so'm 6. 70 066 6691 — 150 000 so'm 7. 99 844 7372 — 99 000 so'm 8. 95 759 1111 — 6 000 000 so'm 9. 99 77…

19 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC333 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026

┌ 🔵 Uzmobile | 🔥 ├ 🇺🇿 Yetkazib berish: Bepul ├ 👩‍💻 Operator ├ 📞 994074444 | 559030202 └ 🤖 @raqamtanlashbot 24/7 👉 Barcha raqamlar ro'yxati Raqam | Narxi 1. 77 020 5797 — 99 000 so'm 2. 77 334 4707 — 99 000 so'm 3. 95 730 0300 — 600 000 so'm 4. 95 952 3434 — 350 000 so'm 5. 99 863 1797 — 99 000 so'm 6. 99 777 7890 — 300 000 so'm 7. 99 778 0161 — 99 000 so'm 8. 95 559 0905 — 200 000 so'm 9. 99 222 27…

❤1

19 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC356 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026

┌ 🔵 Uzmobile | 🔥 ├ 🇺🇿 Yetkazib berish: Bepul ├ 👩‍💻 Operator ├ 📞 994074444 | 559030202 └ 🤖 @raqamtanlashbot 24/7 👉 Barcha raqamlar ro'yxati Raqam | Narxi 1. 99 801 1963 — 99 000 so'm 2. 95 430 0304 — 200 000 so'm 3. 99 801 3832 — 99 000 so'm 4. 99 555 5235 — 180 000 so'm 5. 95 329 9995 — 500 000 so'm 6. 95 880 0066 — 600 000 so'm 7. 95 059 1939 — 99 000 so'm 8. 95 111 1602 — 180 000 so'm 9. 99 137 7…

❤1

19 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC348 viewsread 20 August 2026

┌ 🟣 Ucell ├ 🇺🇿 Доставка: Bepul ├ 👩‍💻 @raqamtanlashxizmati407 ├ 📞 994074444 | 559030202 └ 🤖 @raqamtanlashbot 24/7 🟢 Online shoshilamiz | Narxi 1. 50 190 7373 - 50 000 so'm 👉 Ja'mi raqamlar ro'yxati ⏬👇Tanlang👇⏬

19 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC383 viewsread 20 August 2026

┌ 🔵 Uzmobile | 🔥 ├ 🇺🇿 Yetkazib berish: Bepul ├ 👩‍💻 Operator ├ 📞 994074444 | 559030202 └ 🤖 @raqamtanlashbot 24/7 👉 Barcha raqamlar ro'yxati Raqam | Narxi 1. 95 444 4634 — 180 000 so'm 2. 95 735 5550 — 450 000 so'm 3. 70 111 1153 — 700 000 so'm 4. 99 790 3031 — 99 000 so'm 5. 99 111 1643 — 180 000 so'm 6. 99 171 1525 — 99 000 so'm 7. 99 777 3190 — 180 000 so'm 8. 99 193 0343 — 99 000 so'm 9. 99 760 9…

18 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC408 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026

┌ 🔵 Uzmobile | 🔥 ├ 🇺🇿 Yetkazib berish: Bepul ├ 👩‍💻 Operator ├ 📞 994074444 | 559030202 └ 🤖 @raqamtanlashbot 24/7 👉 Barcha raqamlar ro'yxati Raqam | Narxi 1. 99 760 7323 — 99 000 so'm 2. 99 107 0729 — 150 000 so'm 3. 99 865 2329 — 99 000 so'm 4. 95 989 6060 — 1 000 000 so'm 5. 95 731 1991 — 270 000 so'm 6. 95 662 6600 — 700 000 so'm 7. 99 909 3252 — 99 000 so'm 8. 99 777 2468 — 180 000 so'm 9. 95 405…

❤1

18 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC376 viewsread 20 August 2026

┌ 🔵 Uzmobile | 🔥 ├ 🇺🇿 Yetkazib berish: Bepul ├ 👩‍💻 Operator ├ 📞 994074444 | 559030202 └ 🤖 @raqamtanlashbot 24/7 👉 Barcha raqamlar ro'yxati Raqam | Narxi 1. 95 517 7708 — 99 000 so'm 2. 99 787 8001 — 99 000 so'm 3. 99 332 3272 — 99 000 so'm 4. 77 347 4749 — 99 000 so'm 5. 95 555 1452 — 180 000 so'm 6. 99 069 8949 — 99 000 so'm 7. 99 760 7535 — 99 000 so'm 8. 95 750 0101 — 3 800 000 so'm 9. 95 740 00…

Showing the 12 most recent of 113 posts we hold for @Mobioperator. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Raqam Tanlash Xizmati” (@Mobioperator), 6,542 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mobioperator.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.