—Twilight Disband
😭5

Channel
@Mk_label_official
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
74subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003880874936 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Mk_label_official |
| Description | 04.04.2026 GLOBAL LABEL🌍 Groups: Everlast, Twilight Partnership: @Mk_partnership Music Album: @Mk_music_album Mk Survival: @frostbite_mk Archive: @Mk_archives Contact: @marinakim15 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 3 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Mk_label_official |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:30 | 74 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 74 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
76 reactions across 9 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 25.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 10.5% | |
| 💘 | 7 | 9.21% | |
| 😭 | 7 | 9.21% | |
| 🌚 | 6 | 7.89% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 7.89% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 7.89% | |
| ☃ | 4 | 5.26% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 2.63% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 2.63% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 2.63% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 2.63% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 2.63% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.32% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 1.32% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.32% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2026 to 18 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Mk_label_official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 May 2026 to 18 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
—Twilight Disband
😭5
📢 OFFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENT We would like to officially announce that the ownership of MK Label has been transferred. Previous Owner: RiaKon @In_another_life_JobInn New Owner: Marina @marinakim15 Thank you for your support to MK Label, and please continue supporting us under the new leadership. #𝗠𝗸@Mk_label_official
❤2🔥2
Sticker, posted without a caption
#Mk_Partnership
➵ 𓈒 ֗ 𝓟𝖑𝖆𝖙𝖋𝖔𝖗𝖒 9¾ 𝘓𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘓𝘰𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨… 🦉📜 { 𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘬 🪄 } 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘴𝘦𝘢𝘭 𝘰𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘴. 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘩𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘶𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘭𝘥𝘴, 𝘸𝘢𝘹 𝘤𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘬𝘴 🕯️ 𝘢 𝘴𝘰𝘧𝘵 𝘴𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘬 ✨ 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘭𝘦𝘵𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘴𝘢𝘺𝘴… YOU, yes you — have been invited to audition for our 2026 BOY GROUP AUDITION 𝟐𝐍𝐃 𝐄𝐃𝐈𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍! @PLATFORM934CORPORATE ↓ ˚ ↷ 𝘢𝘯 𝘰𝘸𝘭 𝘩𝘢𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 a global audition! 𝘵𝘰 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 male artists 𝘸𝘩𝘰 𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘳𝘺 𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘪𝘤 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯. 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘳𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘦𝘴𝘵. quiet wizard confidence.⚡🦉 ⤿ׄ 📜 𝗥𝗢𝗨𝗧𝗘 𓂃
Sticker, posted without a caption
#Mk_Partnership
୭ 𓈒 + 🧙🏻♀ 𝗣𝗟𝗔𝗧𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗠 9¾ 𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗧𝗡𝗘𝗥𝗦𝗛𝗜𝗣 𓈈 ° ˖ 🪄 𝖧𝖾𝗅𝗅𝗈 𝖿𝖾𝗅𝗅𝗈𝗐𝗌, @Platform934Corporate 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗐 𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗇 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗉. 𝖳𝗁𝗋𝗈𝗎𝗀𝗁 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌, 𝗂𝗍 𝖼𝖺𝗇 𝗀𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝖻𝗈𝗍𝗁 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾s lots 𝗈𝖿 𝖻𝖾𝗇𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗍𝗌. 𝖧𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝗂𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝗐𝖺𝗒s 𝗍𝗈 𝖻𝖾 𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗉 : 𓈄᳸ .. ₊ 𝗠𝗔𝗣 🗺 ₊ .. 𓈄᳸ 𓈈 𝗥𝗨𝗟𝗘𝗦 𓈈 𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗠𝗦 𓈈 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗧𝗔𝗖𝗧 © 𝗣𝗟𝗔𝗧𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗠 9¾
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤4
Sticker, posted without a caption
⋆𐙚₊˚⊹♡ 𝓦.E.L.C.O.M.E to 𝗙𝗥𝗢𝗦𝗧𝗕𝗜𝗧𝗘 Where the cold never sleeps and only the strongest survive ❄️ 𖥔 ݁ ˖ From frozen silence to ice-sharp performances, this is not just a survival show… this is a test of everything you’ve got. ୧ ‧₊˚ ❄️ ⋅ ☆ FORMAT ୧ ‧₊˚ ❄️ ⋅ ☆ RULES ୧ ‧₊˚ ❄️ ⋅ ☆ PDN ୧ ‧₊˚ ❄️ ⋅ ☆ CONTACT 𝓘n this frozen arena, talent alone isn’t enough ꨄ︎ You need control, presence, and the power to stand out even in the…
🔥3🍓2❤1🐳1💘1🥰1🆒1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Mk_label_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 915,350 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝗠𝗸 𝗟𝗔𝗕𝗘𝗟” (@Mk_label_official), 74 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mk_label_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.