Sxy Content https://t.me/+HA_LSDEyt_xjMzg1 https://t.me/+HA_LSDEyt_xjMzg1 https://t.me/+HA_LSDEyt_xjMzg1

Channel
Desi Actress
@Mix_Actress
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
26,898subscribers
+1,136 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001386457594 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Mix_Actress |
| Description | Desi Actresses Channel 🔥🥵 Actress All Bollywood & South Indian Actresses For Feeling Pleasure Relax🥵🍌💦💦💦 Hot & Sexy Pics/Gifs/Videos Channel for all Mix Actress Collection😍 Respect every Actress 🙏🙏🙏 Join Fast ⏩⏩⏩ For Paid Promotion @SHlVAJi |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Mix_Actress |
Topic
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 22:01 | 26,898 | -138 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 27,036 | +56 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 01:19 | 26,980 | +16 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 26,964 | +16 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:01 | 26,948 | -58 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:39 | 27,006 | -10 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:41 | 27,016 | +13 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:14 | 27,003 | +40 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:23 | 26,963 | +87 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 26,876 | +13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 26,863 | +10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 26,853 | +98 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:39 | 26,755 | -12 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 26,767 | +69 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 26,698 | +54 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 26,644 | +37 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 26,607 | +79 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 26,528 | +139 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 26,389 | +52 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:06 | 26,337 | first reading |
Engagement
407 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 82 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.4%
- avg views ÷ 26,898 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,150
- 46 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.837%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 48
- of 407 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 41 of 46 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 407 (4 August 2026 – 3 October 2026) |
| Views total | 190,872 |
| Reactions total | 1,482 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Oct 2026, 05:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈11,900
- Videos
- ≈1,800
- Links
- ≈176
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4m 20s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,471 reactions across 190 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 1,789 | 40.0% | |
| ❤ | 1,456 | 32.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 995 | 22.3% | |
| 🥰 | 99 | 2.21% | |
| 👎 | 40 | 0.895% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 0.559% | |
| 😍 | 25 | 0.559% | |
| 🤩 | 15 | 0.335% | |
| 👌 | 12 | 0.268% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 0.157% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 0.112% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.045% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.022% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 197 of the 407 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,471 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 407 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://t.me/lustybollywood
🔥3
Your Favourite🥵🫦
- Ananya Babe34%
- Bhagyashri72%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤1
Ananya/Bhagyashri
🔥14❤🔥6
Ahhh👄
🔥25❤10❤🔥8👎1
https://t.me/yourhotgirls007
𝗘𝗫𝗖𝗟𝗨𝗦𝗜𝗩𝗘 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗡𝗧 https://t.me/+sUL7PQ09-XI2NzZl https://t.me/+sUL7PQ09-XI2NzZl
LINKS HUB (18+) https://telegram.me/+RUwZBe0Qa25lN2Yx https://telegram.me/+RUwZBe0Qa25lN2Yx
❤1
🎬✨ Your daily dose of stunning actress edits! ❤️🔥 Check out Starframe Edits 👇 https://t.me/+b2YnR39m2K8yZDk1
❤2🔥2
https://t.me/+roNQjx0Y-d5hZTU1 https://t.me/serialactresslovers
Chaat lo👅
🔥36❤18❤🔥12🥰3
Ahhh Alia🔥🥵
❤🔥13👍7❤4🔥1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 407 posts we hold for @Mix_Actress. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Your Favourite🥵🫦
- Ananya Babe34%
- Bhagyashri72%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Who You Want💋🫦
- Dishahhhhhhhh37%
- Tamannaahhhhhh71%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Kon Zyada mst lgti🍌🫦
- B'day Girl Ayesha65%
- Avneet Babe44%
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Who look more Se*y🖤
- KIARA Mommy69%
- Tripti Bhabhi39%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Kispe nikalna💦💦
- Malavika Mohanan71%
- Nidhhi Agerwal37%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Most S*xy Babe👄🫦
- Nushrratt Babe30%
- Mrunal Babe77%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 407 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Hottest_Actresses · 23,9678 posts💋❤️Lusty Bollywood Actresses❤️💋
@lustybollywood · 16,6196 postsactress_lussty_memes
@Actress_Lussty_Memes · 235 posts𖤗 𝙏𝘼𝙈𝙄𝙇 𝙐𝙇𝙇𝙐 𝙑𝙄𝘿𝙀𝙊𝙎 𖤗
@tamilunratedvideos · 9,4924 postsᕠႫກ꯭ꪆ᪻᪳᪰᪱᪳ᤌᮀᤌവ𑂞Ⴋ᪙ໍ ᪑ᩤ𑆝⃯༏ໍᤌᮀ 2.0🔗
@SorgavasaLink · 10,8843 postsACTRESS STUFFS
@bbkccjkmm · 2,7221 post✨ Tamannaah Bhatia ✨
@tamanna_bhatia_fans · 18,0851 postThunder Thighs
@thunderthighhss · 9,8591 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Hot_Actresses_Bollywood · 2,90112 postsHottest Actresses🔥🥵
@Hottest_Actresses · 23,96711 posts💋❤️Lusty Bollywood Actresses❤️💋
@lustybollywood · 16,6198 postsHot channels 🔥🎀
@only_adult_allowed · 1,8643 posts𝘼𝙘𝙩𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙨 𝙁𝙡𝙪𝙭 𓆩❦𓆪
@Actress_Flux · 6302 postsActress Kingdom
@ActressKingdom0 · 1,2072 postsACTRESS TRENDZ
@ACTRESSTRENDZ · 6,7382 postsᴀᴄᴛʀᴇꜱꜱᴢᴏɴᴇ ᴜʜᴅ 𓆩♡𓆪
@ActressZone_UHD · 5942 postsHot Models 🔥
@hotmodels100 · 8752 postsHUSNPARI'™ 𓆤
@husnparicommunity · 1,1562 postsYour hot insta girls 🦋
@yourhotgirls007 · 9,3492 posts𝘼𝘾𝙏𝙍𝙀𝙎𝙎 𝘽𝙄 𝙈𝘼𝙆𝙀𝙍
@actressbimaker · 1,7871 post🥵ANJU KURIAN SLAVE💦
@anjuslaves · 1,0221 postACTRESS STUFFS
@bbkccjkmm · 2,7221 post𝘾𝙚𝙡𝙚𝙗𝙭𝙨𝙝𝙤𝙩𝙨 𝙉𝙚𝙬 𝕏̷
@celebxshots1 · 5,9361 postHottiez Hubz
@Hotiez_hub · 8,3091 postSofia ansari 🦋
@ItsSofiaansari · 8,2521 post🤍Lusty Actresses🤍
@lustyactresses2 · 8,3651 postserialactress lovers
@serialactresslovers · 2,9641 postSLEEPBHAGAO'™ 𓆤
@sleepbhagaocommunity · 7531 postThunder Thighs
@thunderthighhss · 9,8591 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Mix_Actress named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026 · confirmed gone 12 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 4 posts, 13 August 2026 – 2 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Desi Actress” (@Mix_Actress), 26,898 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mix_Actress.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.