Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for °Мисс_Цю°

Channel

°Мисс_Цю°

@MissQiuKosp

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

75subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003588387020
TypeChannel
Username@MissQiuKosp
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/MissQiuKosp

Growth

667771.511 August 2026 — 69 subscribers11 August 2026 — 69 subscribers19 August 2026 — 66 subscribers26 August 2026 — 77 subscribers10 September 2026 — 75 subscribers7511 August 202610 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 30 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 64–79 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 20:0075-2
26 Aug 2026, 23:3677+11
19 Aug 2026, 03:5166-3
11 Aug 2026, 14:0069no change
11 Aug 2026, 13:4769first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

151 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53417937883166231936140.4%
custom 51949517899290620354932.5%
custom 54744437072247044612214.6%
custom 54204275742851887581711.3%
custom 542045963192108361721.32%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 20:11 UTC28 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

https://t.me/+pUa-jQAbA1ViZjcy

custom 51949517899290620352

9 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC28 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

хммм все понятно

custom 51949517899290620353

8 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC35 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Ну, и куда таким составом..

custom 53417937883166231939custom 51949517899290620353

7 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC37 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Ну, какая Прелесть! спасибо Каору за милый отзыв

custom 54204275742851887586custom 51949517899290620353custom 53417937883166231933

7 Aug 2026, 13:48 UTC39 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 53417937883166231934custom 51949517899290620353

7 Aug 2026, 13:48 UTC38 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

привет, открыла коробочку, выпала та, которую хотела, спасибо большое за розыгрыш!

custom 53417937883166231936custom 51949517899290620354custom 54744437072247044612

7 Aug 2026, 13:48 UTC36 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

так-так-так

custom 51949517899290620354

3 Aug 2026, 21:46 UTC64 views17 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Вот такие пупсики..

custom 54204275742851887588custom 54744437072247044617custom 54204596319210836172

3 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC58 views14 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Сама коллекция очень приятная, мне лично все, так или иначе нравятся, а забрала к себе Edoardo и Luciano

custom 53417937883166231938custom 51949517899290620356

3 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC59 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Такие мальчики мне попались очень нравятся их шарнирные тела, встанут рядом с моими девочками

custom 51949517899290620356custom 53417937883166231935

3 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC57 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

уже давно присматривалась к этой коллекции, и вот наконец решилась приобрести

custom 51949517899290620354

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @MissQiuKosp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“°Мисс_Цю°” (@MissQiuKosp), 75 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MissQiuKosp.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.