Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ˗ˏˋ Миса Ангел ‌᭡࿔𝅄 ۫ 𖹭

Channel

˗ˏˋ Миса Ангел ‌᭡࿔𝅄 ۫ 𖹭

@MisaAngel07

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

613subscribers

-29 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002448815205
TypeChannel
Username@MisaAngel07
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MisaAngel07

Growth

613642627.58 August 2026 — 642 subscribers8 August 2026 — 642 subscribers8 August 2026 — 638 subscribers16 August 2026 — 630 subscribers24 August 2026 — 613 subscribers8 August 202624 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 17 days, net -29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 609–646 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 23:48613-17
16 Aug 2026, 19:03630-8
8 Aug 2026, 17:34638-4
8 Aug 2026, 02:50642no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:49642first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.6%
avg views ÷ 613 subscribers
Avg views / post
169
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held9 (25 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total677
Reactions total85
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

214 reactions across 9 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53367669585934017933315.4%
custom 53371925426077985442712.6%
custom 5343757906925868357167.48%
custom 5337166669724814752157.01%
custom 5429435520864261467157.01%
custom 5343776607213475553136.07%
custom 5337093462007244382125.61%
custom 533699949241777725473.27%
custom 533728622013948758573.27%
custom 537505300144457435073.27%
custom 534365568670422472762.80%
custom 540887449021609072262.80%
custom 529880852296265216452.34%
custom 533452527772267907452.34%
custom 533678671973793370052.34%
custom 533689719918168608441.87%
custom 533731316676430630741.87%
custom 543174458118193204541.87%
custom 533682805879815792031.40%
custom 534364877610184576931.40%
9 further kinds177.94%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 214reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
97
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 9 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MisaAngel07. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 21:38 UTC112 views27 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟

custom 542943552086426146715custom 52988085229626521645custom 54317445811819320454custom 54293980601595009763

5 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC140 views13 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ссылочки на новые вещи с распаковки в тт❤️ 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 фартук❤️ штанишки 🤩

custom 53369994924177772547custom 53368280587981579203custom 53822143354246473342custom 53820421244159466081

3 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC199 views19 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏

custom 533676695859340179311custom 53371925426077985444custom 53367867197379337002custom 53370524966091747262

2 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC226 views26 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴

custom 533709346200724438210custom 53367669585934017938custom 53371925426077985445custom 53367867197379337003

31 Jul 2026, 16:49 UTC258 views21 reactions15 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

+ я сфоткала уточек 🤩 - меня сожрали комары 🤩

custom 534377660721347555313custom 53436487761018457693custom 53437191233711829513custom 53439959640781841022

31 Jul 2026, 07:49 UTC281 views21 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

миса снова ангел

custom 533719254260779854411custom 53368971991816860844custom 53373131667643063074custom 53370934620072443822

28 Jul 2026, 14:50 UTC338 views31 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 534375790692586835716custom 53750530014445743507custom 53436556867042247276custom 53415739675954601452

26 Jul 2026, 15:22 UTC371 views27 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀

custom 533716666972481475215custom 54088744902160907226custom 53345252777226790745custom 54112426406938273911

25 Jul 2026, 14:48 UTC398 views29 reactions12 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 533676695859340179314custom 53371925426077985447custom 53372862201394875857custom 53371434554265727821

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @MisaAngel07. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,227,263 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“˗ˏˋ Миса Ангел ‌᭡࿔𝅄 ۫ 𖹭” (@MisaAngel07), 613 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MisaAngel07.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.