Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 53 days, net +14,364. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,993–28,679 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Sept 2026, 19:17
26,523
+9,636
18 Sept 2026, 03:39
16,887
-59
15 Sept 2026, 23:17
16,946
-32
14 Sept 2026, 08:20
16,978
-56
12 Sept 2026, 16:57
17,034
-75
10 Sept 2026, 14:19
17,109
-110
7 Sept 2026, 11:37
17,219
-159
4 Sept 2026, 16:58
17,378
-50
3 Sept 2026, 00:14
17,428
-66
2 Sept 2026, 01:17
17,494
-79
1 Sept 2026, 02:07
17,573
-89
31 Aug 2026, 01:22
17,662
-95
29 Aug 2026, 22:22
17,757
-61
28 Aug 2026, 23:54
17,818
-90
27 Aug 2026, 21:36
17,908
-82
27 Aug 2026, 00:24
17,990
+16
26 Aug 2026, 03:13
17,974
+193
25 Aug 2026, 02:24
17,781
+186
23 Aug 2026, 16:49
17,595
+374
22 Aug 2026, 01:46
17,221
first reading
Engagement
87 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.22%
avg views ÷ 26,523 subscribers
Avg views / post
855
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.403%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 87 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026
Posts held
87 (25 July 2026 – 1 October 2026)
Views total
23,080
Reactions total
86
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
1 Oct 2026, 07:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,420
Videos
≈914
Links
≈3,950
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 39s
Average length
40s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
498 reactions across 83 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
272
54.6%
🔥
39
7.83%
👍
38
7.63%
😁
29
5.82%
🤣
26
5.22%
💔
18
3.61%
😐
9
1.81%
👏
8
1.61%
😢
6
1.20%
🤔
6
1.20%
👎
5
1.00%
🤨
5
1.00%
🥰
5
1.00%
🌚
4
0.803%
🤡
4
0.803%
🍾
3
0.602%
🖕
3
0.602%
😎
3
0.602%
😭
3
0.602%
🤝
3
0.602%
5 further kinds
9
1.81%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 83 of the 87 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 498 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 87 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎬 ستاره «Even Stevens» از رابطه پرتنش خود با Shia LaBeouf گفت
کریستی رومرو در پادکستی درباره رابطهاش با شیا لبوف در دوران ساخت Even Stevens صحبت کرد و گفت رابطه آنها در آن زمان شبیه «آب و روغن» بوده است.
او تفاوت شدید شرایط کودکی و تربیت خود و لابهاف را یکی از عوامل این تنش دانست. بخشهایی از خاطرات رومانو قرار است در کتاب زندگینامهاش که ۶ اکتبر منتشر میشود، مطرح شود.
@MiraTweets | #Series
🦸♂️ چهار صحنه جدید «Avengers: Endgame Encore» چه چیزی را لو میدهند؟
🦸 ۴ صحنه جدید «Endgame Encore» مستقیماً به «Doomsday» وصل میشوند
با اکران مجدد Avengers: Endgame Encore، جزئیات چهار صحنه جدید فیلم منتشر شده که ارتباط آنها با داستان Avengers: Doomsday را روشنتر میکند.
برادران روسو پیشتر گفته بودند که تماشای نسخه جدید Endgame برای درک ارتباط آن با Doomsday اهمیت دارد.
@MiraTweets | #Movies
🧙♀️ چرا قسمتهای «Coven Academy» اینقدر کوتاهاند؟
تیم فدرل، خالق سریال Coven Academy، در گفتوگویی جدید درباره ساختار متفاوت قسمتهای سریال و دنیای جادوگران آن صحبت کرده است.
او همچنین توضیح داده که این سریال تلاش میکند بخشی از فضای داستانهای نوجوانانه درباره جادو و هویت را که کمتر در آثار جریان اصلی دیده شده، بررسی کند.
@MiraTweets | #Series
🎭 سارا پالسون: «قصد نداشتم از Charlize Theron بهتر باشم»
پس از آغاز مقایسههای گسترده میان بازی Sarah Paulson و اجرای Charlize Theron در نقش Aileen Wuornos، پلسون به این بحث واکنش نشان داد.
او تأکید کرده که هدفش رقابت با اجرای ترون نبوده و اجرای ترون را تحسین میکند. Theron برای بازی در فیلم Monster در سال ۲۰۰۳ اسکار بهترین بازیگر زن را دریافت کرده بود.
@MiraTweets | #Series
🍎 سریال «Carême» برای فصل دوم برمیگردد
🍽اپل تی وی پلاس سریال فرانسوی «Carême» را تمدید کرد
Apple TV+ ساخت فصل دوم سریال فرانسوی Carême را تأیید کرده است.
این سریال زندگی Antonin Carême، آشپز مشهور دوران ناپلئون، را در قالب داستانی ترکیبی از درام تاریخی و جاسوسی روایت میکند.
@MiraTweets | #Series
💔بلیک لایولی از مدیر روابط عمومی قدیمیاش جدا شد
گزارش Page Six میگوید Blake Lively همکاری خود با Leslie Sloane، مدیر روابط عمومی قدیمیاش، را پس از بیش از دو دهه پایان داده است.
این جدایی در شرایطی رخ داده که Lively همچنان با پیامدهای حقوقی پرونده مربوط به Justin Baldoni و فیلم It Ends With Us درگیر بوده است. طبق گزارش، پرونده در ماه مه ۲۰۲۶ پیش از رسیدن به دادگاه حلوفصل شد.
با اخلاقای بلیک واقعا دلم برای منیجر و…
🏆 فهرست کامل AFI Fest 2026 اعلام شد
🎥 «Possible Love» برنده ونیز در میان فیلمهای AFI Fest 2026
مؤسسه فیلم آمریکا فهرست کامل فیلمهای AFI Fest 2026 را اعلام کرد.
در میان آثار انتخابشده، فیلم Possible Love ساخته لی چانگدونگ که برنده شیر طلایی جشنواره ونیز شده، دیده میشود. جشنواره چهلم AFI Fest از ۲۱ تا ۲۵ اکتبر در هالیوود برگزار خواهد شد و ۱۵۷ فیلم را به نمایش میگذارد.
@MiraTweets | #Movies
🌊 جنیفر لارنس به فیلم جدید کارگردان «Weapons» پیوست
🎬 جنیفر لارنس در فیلم علمیتخیلی جدید Zach Cregger بازی میکند
جنیفر لارنس برای بازی در فیلم علمیتخیلی The Flood به کارگردانی زک کرگر، کارگردان Weapons، قرارداد بسته است.
این فیلم یک پروژه اورجینال از New Line Cinema است و کرگر علاوه بر کارگردانی، نویسندگی و تهیهکنندگی آن را نیز بر عهده دارد. جزئیات داستان فعلاً مخفی نگه داشته شده است.
@MiraTweets | #Movies
🎬 تبلیغ جدید «Digger»: «خودتان تصمیم بگیرید»
پس از انتشار نقدهای متفاوت درباره فیلم Digger با بازی Tom Cruise، تبلیغ جدید فیلم مستقیماً به واکنشهای منفی اشاره میکند و از مخاطبان میخواهد فیلم را خودشان ببینند و قضاوت کنند.
این فیلم به کارگردانی Alejandro G. Iñárritu ساخته شده و بازیگرانی مانند Riz Ahmed، Sandra Hüller و Jesse Plemons نیز در آن حضور دارند.
@MiraTweets | #Movies
حالا «The Kid Detective» به سریال تبدیل میشود
🔎 «The Kid Detective» راهی تلویزیون میشود!
فیلم معمایی-کمدی The Kid Detective قرار است در قالب یک سریال برای Hulu توسعه پیدا کند.
اِوَن مورگان، نویسنده و کارگردان فیلم اصلی محصول ۲۰۲۰، بهعنوان تهیهکننده اجرایی در نسخه سریالی حضور دارد و Alex Berger که سابقه فعالیت در The Mentalist، Blindspot و Quantum Leap را دارد، نویسندگی و تهیهکنندگی اجرایی سریال را بر عهده خواهد …
🎬 کارگردان «Predator» سراغ «Sleeping Beauty» میرود!
دَن تراختنبرگ، کارگردان Prey و Predator: Badlands، قرار است فیلم جدیدی را برای دیزنی بر اساس داستان کلاسیک Sleeping Beauty کارگردانی کند.
این پروژه یک بازسازی مستقیم از انیمیشن ۱۹۵۹ نیست و قرار است داستان را در مسیری کاملاً جدید روایت کند. فیلم همچنین ارتباطی با مجموعه Maleficent ندارد. فیلمنامه را الکس آنفنگر و دن شیمپف مینویسند و پروژه هنوز در مراحل ابتدایی توسع…
🎬 آنا کندریک از کارگردانی «The Seven Husbands of Evelyn Hugo» میگوید
آنا کندریک در جشنواره فیلم زوریخ درباره تجربه کارگردانی اقتباس سینمایی The Seven Husbands of Evelyn Hugo صحبت کرد و از حضور پشت دوربین این پروژه ابراز هیجان کرد. این فیلم اقتباسی از رمان پرفروش تیلور جنکینز رید است.
@MiraTweets | #Movies
❤3
Signed Hannah
Showing the 12 most recent of 87 posts we hold for @MiraTweets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@MiraTweets edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
22 August 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 11 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
نظرسنجی عمومی بی ربط به فیلم:
فرافکنی عشق بر روی یک شخص خارجی حتی افلاطونی امن هست یا خیر؟
خیر59%
بله9%
پروسهای هست ک با طی بشه اگه اتفاق افتاد میتونه باعث رشد متقابل بشه33%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 87 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 1 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
موزیک🎧 @ha3rat1 · 27,723 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mira Tweet | میرا توییت” (@MiraTweets), 26,523 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MiraTweets.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.