8 measurements spanning 8 days, net +4,647. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,419–17,747 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 19:38
16,806
-211
15 Aug 2026, 09:34
17,017
+100
14 Aug 2026, 03:37
16,917
+2,848
12 Aug 2026, 23:29
14,069
+1,897
11 Aug 2026, 21:47
12,172
+16
10 Aug 2026, 23:25
12,156
+7
10 Aug 2026, 02:02
12,149
-10
9 Aug 2026, 06:45
12,159
first reading
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.2%
avg views ÷ 16,806 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,890
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.317%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held
30 (25 July 2026 – 16 August 2026)
Views total
56,695
Reactions total
180
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 18:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 11s
Average length
1m 11s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
180 reactions across 29 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
109
60.6%
👍
20
11.1%
🤣
14
7.78%
😁
9
5.00%
🔥
6
3.33%
👏
4
2.22%
🤡
4
2.22%
🖕
3
1.67%
👎
2
1.11%
💔
2
1.11%
😢
2
1.11%
🍓
1
0.556%
🍾
1
0.556%
🏆
1
0.556%
🥰
1
0.556%
🥴
1
0.556%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 180reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
همه رحیم نجارو دوست دارن ولی ما چولسو نجار رو
رندانه و هنرمندانه کارگردان با هر سکانس عشق رو تزریق میکنه به رگامون.
چقدر کله خری هاشونم دوست داشتم.
یه داستان عاشقانه از کره.
بسیار بسیار Perfect Sense وایب با این تفاوت که خیلی 6 سال زودتر ساخته شد.
+اگه این رو بخوری از حال خودت خارج میشی.
-اگه نشم چی؟
+تا اوقتی زندهایم با هم غریبه میشیم.
"HANИAH"
📥 A Moment to Remember | فرصتی برای به یاد آوردن
@MiraTweets | #Mov…
یه بازی کامپیوتری چقدر میتونه واقعی بشه؟ چقدر میتونه احساسات پیدا کنه؟ ایا واقعا اگه شخصیت های کامپیوتری احساس دارن؟ اگه داشتن بازم میرفتین GTA و ادمارو زیر میگرفتین؟
داستان دو توسعه دهنده بازی که قسمت بازی کامپیوتریش خیلی جدی تره! دو ساعت کمدی و ماجراجویی و رایان رینولدز و لیل ری.
"HANИAH"
📥 Free Guy | مرد آزاد
@MiraTweets | #Movies
ادما رو چقدر میشناسیم؟ نکنه اونی که ساده گرفته همه چی رو تا تهش دیده باشه؟ اگر ما هم ببینیم و گیر کنیم چی؟ داستان یک عروسی مقصد مشخصشده که تبدیل به مقصد همیشگی میشه. با رازهای پنهان زیاد.
بسیار گیرا و جذاب.
"HANИAH"
📥 Un Mariage sans fin | ازدواج بی پایان
@MiraTweets | #Movies
از سری باباهایی که قراره خونه رو بچرخونن. مسئولیت های خونه خیلی اسونه، نه؟ پس یکم دردسر بکشیم.
البته به نظرم خیلی بیشتر میشد روی دردسرهای خونه و بچهها تمرکز کرد و نجار هم حکم شخصیت "گریف" تو "Daddy's Home" بود. که همه میدونن کی برندهاس😁
ولی در تقسیم مسئولیت واقعا قوی وارد شد و دومین فیلم (Oh. What. Fun.) امسال هست که بهش اشاره داره.
اگر مقایسه کنیم با سری مردهایی که خونه بهشون سپرده شده باید بگیم تا ابدددددددد…
اقا یه سوال
اگه توی یه تریسام هر دو نفر حامله بشن، پدر بچه مال کیه؟🤣
پس یه داستان درام، کمدی و عاشقانه ببینیم از اینکه این آش شلم شوربا چجوری باید راست و ریست بشه.
"HANИAH"
📥 The Threesome | سهنفره
@MiraTweets | #Movies
کمدی The Invite درمورد ازدواج رو به پایان زوجیه که دعوت از همسایهشون برای شام با چالش متفاوتی روبروشون میکنه.
فیلمنامهی حسابشده، کارگردانی خوب، بازیهای قوی و طنز والا از ویژگیهای این فیلمه. خدایی بیخود نیست بین ۳ تا فیلمیه که از همین حالا میگن فصل جوایز موفقی در انتظارشه.
حتما ببینید. اگه متاهل هستید، دو بار ببینید!
📥 The invite 2026
@MiraTweets | #Movies
یه مینی سریال معمایی و عاشقانه که این دو سه روزی ببینید و کیف کنید.
100% بر حسب سریالها و فیلمهای سفر در زمان پایانهای متفاوتی رو براش در نظر میگیرید. ساده و سرسری ولی قراره سوپرایزتون کنه.
یه سوال قبل اینکه این مینی سریالو ببنید
شما تو گذشته چیو تغییر میدین؟
یه سوال بعد اینکه این مینی سریالو دیدید
شما تو گذشته چیو تغییر میدین؟
اصلا ایا تصمیم متفاوتتری میگیرین سر عشق؟
"HANИAH"
📥 11.22.63 | 11.22.63
@Mir…
طبق معمول ی جزیره و ازمایشگاه های سری و مشکوک و غیرقانونی فقط اینبار با محکومین قضایی و داروی عشق.
2022 ‧ Sci-fi/Thriller ‧ 1h 47m
"HANИAH"
📥Spiderhead | اسپایدرهد
@MiraTweets | #Movies
چقدر منو دوست داری؟ نه چقدر! چقدر💸💰؟ مرد برنده لاتاری چقدر حاضر است برای فاحشهای جذاب بپردازد؟ نگیم که چقدرم مونیکا بلوچی خوبه!
شما چقدر میدین؟ حاضرین کل مبلغ میلیونی برد لاتاری رو بدین؟
"HANИAH"
📥How Much Do You Love Me? | چقدر مرا دوست داری؟
@MiraTweets | #Movies
اشغالسازی مسکن مهر کرهای، اقتصاد مزخرف برای قشر کارمند/کارگر، گرونی سئول و پیشرفت سئول. کشور کوچولویی که جنبه غیر گوگولی هم زیاد ازش میبینیم.حالا این که اجر و بتن و سیمانه، ببین بنیادشون چجوریه.
"HANИAH"
📥 Wall to Wall | دیوار به دیوار
@MiraTweets | #Movies
بهش میگن جان ویک شرق آسیا. فیلم تایلندی Debt Collector که تونسته سومین فیلم پربینندهی خارجیزبان نتفلیکس بشه.
درست مثل جان ویک داستان سادهای داره. یه خلافکار سابق که تازه از زندان آزاد شده، تصمیم میگیره به یه پیرزن و نوهش کمک کنه و همین باعث میشه با خلافکارهای کلهگنده روبرو بشه.
“MHS”
📥 Debt Collector 2026
@MiraTweets | #Movies
👍4❤2👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @MiraTweets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
شما زیرنویس سفید پرسن هستین یا زیرنویس زرد پرسن؟⬜️🟨
سفید پرسن57%
زرد پرسن24%
هر چه پیش آید خوش آید پرسن19%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 16 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 269,975 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mira Tweet | میرا توییت” (@MiraTweets), 16,806 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MiraTweets.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
