Channel
@Minimaldox
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
46subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001230002498 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Minimaldox |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Minimaldox |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 46 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 47 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 47 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 November 2025 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
32 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 40.6% | |
| 💔 | 7 | 21.9% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 15.6% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 9.38% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 6.25% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2025 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
كاش وقتی به یکی زنگ میزنیم که باهاش درددل کنیم، سعی نکنیم بگیم: اوه! وضعیت من که خیلی بدتر از توئه. گاهی حواسمون به حال بقیه باشه. گوش بودن رو یاد بگیریم. شاید اون لحظه؛ قبل از فرو ریختنش باشه که به تو بهش زنگ زدی. شاید اگر تو نبودی، چندتا قرص جاتو پر میکرد. @minimaldox
"خسته"ام بد نیست روی ایوان ویرانیام نشسته و چای مینوشد شاید منتظر خبری است که آمدنش را داده بودند. که نبود و نابود شود. شاید باران ابری که از بخار کتری همسایه شکل گرفته، بیاید و بروفدش از تنم به لبخند تمسخری میگوید: نه! نه این بخار، بخار است و نه این ابر، ابر دلت را خوش نکن بارانی در کار نیست، من هنوز میهمان شانههایت هستم. ارسطو @minimaldox
همه میگفتن: چقدر باید دلت بزرگ باشه که توی مراسم پسرت، لبخند بزنی که مهمونها راحت باشن، که اگر توی این شرایط زبون تسکین برای دردهات ندارن، معذب نشن. که احساس شرمندگی نکنن. میگفتن: شاید گریههاشو توی تنهاییاش کرده. تیر به سر پسر خورده بود و به قلب پدر نشست به چهلم نرسیده دق کرد اما پدر را توی آمار نیاوردند @minimaldox
😭2
باران! خبر بدی برایت دارم پاک نشد کوچه هنوز رد خون دارد. @minimaldox
😢2
گفتم: خوبی؟ گفت: تو نمیری سه کافتیم. یعنی چی؟ ها!! یعنی کوچکتیم، کرتیم کلافهتیم، تو کفتیم. گفتم: چهار تا شد که. حالا کجا میری؟ گفت: حاجی خیلی تو کفیم، یعنی چهل ساله مث کفخوابا تو کفیم. میریم که دیگه تو کف نمونیم. تازه شیم، صدای استکان شسته شیم. واس اینکه تو کف نمونیم، باس تو کف خیابون بمونیم. یعنی چی؟ یعنی بجنگیم، هیچ کفی قد کف خیابون کف نی. تو هم بجنب تا از کفت نرفته. @minimaldox
❤5
نقشه فرار از سلول تنهایی ام را پشت خوابهایم خالکوبی کرده ام. @minimaldox
خواست ماچش کنه املاش ضعیف بود توی پاچش کرد @Minimaldox
دارند اذانمان را میخوانند. @Minimaldox
💔2
قلمی بود، زیباترین شعر دنیا شد. @minimaldox
❤3
بچه های کوه آلپ بعد از ظهرهای نمیدانم چندشنبه هفته بود که رنگ و بوی کودکیمان عاشقانهتر میشد. آن زمانی که خبری از ریمون نبود و پیچ تلویزیون را دستی زیاد میکردیم. تا خرذوق شویم از دیدن کارتون مورد علاقهمان. وقتی که آنت و لوسین از تپهها پایین میآمدند و به قسمت سنتور موسیقی تیتراژ میرسید؛ چه آبی در دلمان تکان میخورد. ترس در تنمان میافتاد که در این قسمت، لوسین قرار است چه خطایی بکند تا مورد غضب آنتِ نامهربان قر…
👍1
آقا جان؛ بزرگ خاندان بود، اما دايیجان؛ بزرگتر خاندان. مرجع بود. کسی روی حرفش حرف نمیزد. نه که دیکتاتور باشد، حرفی نمیماند. فصلالخطاب بود. تا بود، پشتم به كوه بند بود. وقتی كه رفت، من از بچههایش یتیمتر شدم. شبی که رفت، من سر مزار خودم فاتحه خواندم. ارسطو @minimaldox
💔2
بی صاحاب شده از «دل» بودن فقط گرفتنش رو یاد گرفته. @minimaldox
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Minimaldox. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,061,461 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Minimaldox” (@Minimaldox), 46 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Minimaldox.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.