Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Mini Bang Calls

@MiniBangCall

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,573subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002243310977
TypeChannel
Username@MiniBangCall
DescriptionOwner @Farhad_Loyal Main Cahnnel @BigBangCall 🚨 Don't buy after my calls
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MiniBangCall

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@MiniBangCall/4382 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC@Marvels_Calls/31466 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@MiniBangCall/4383 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC@Marvels_Calls/31476 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC1.00under a minute
@MiniBangCall/4389 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTC@Marvels_Calls/31517 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@MiniBangCall/4393 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC@Marvels_Calls/31547 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@MiniBangCall/4398 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC@Marvels_Calls/31607 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@MiniBangCall/4404 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC@Marvels_Calls/31667 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Marvels_Calls8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.99under a minutethis entry (80)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @MiniBangCall — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

7,5737,5747,573.57 Aug 2026, 13:38 — 7,574 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:46 — 7,574 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 08:14 — 7,573 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:388 Aug 2026, 08:14
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,573–7,574 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 08:147,573-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:467,574no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:387,574first reading

Engagement

111 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.136%
avg views ÷ 7,573 subscribers
Avg views / post
10.3
111 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
111
of 111 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held111 (6 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total1,141
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
618
Videos
2,460
Links
3,190

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 08s
Average length
4s

Measured directly from 62 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC6 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

SOL TOKEN $CURATE SOL chain project, launched 32 minutes ago. Unknown team, so this is a high-risk project. It's better to just watch it for now. Current chart is $29.7K mc. Not financial advice, plz dyor. CA: GwNkdAhJhc6xRkzrK6YzjF5Yh1CJXh4CBbey5JEapump https://dexscreener.com/solana/j2rohgra8wmqlrahn2yrmgswqxns4b1vaxgm8f2esyc1 Telegram Website Twitter/X

12 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC8 viewsread 12 August 2026

SOL TOKEN $MARINE SOL chain project, launched 3 minutes ago. Unknown team, so this is a high-risk project. It's better to just watch it for now. Current chart is $23.7K mc. Not financial advice, plz dyor. CA: 8ZfN7GdSdyZBiupMTKBeYGgAaKxaHexsAj8uN7Ucpump https://dexscreener.com/solana/aa9vd3nbpqt5vn2r72fpmbpxkwsviacyqmzxs3zhaxge Website Twitter/X

12 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC10 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

SOL TOKEN $SAM SOL chain project, launched 17 minutes ago. Unknown team, so this is a high-risk project. It's better to just watch it for now. Current chart is $21.6K mc. Not financial advice, plz dyor. CA: uQoxYd6B4A3M6bWfz2Hy2vz8K5gKPG63tsdEWDphWBt https://dexscreener.com/solana/ebypxqgttrkxpu6mntjnhj7ueqzek753gfzyzfszgujh Website Twitter/X

12 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC12 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

BSC TOKEN $MARVIN BSC chain project, launched 40 minutes ago. Unknown team, so this is a high-risk project. It's better to just watch it for now. Current chart is $31.7K mc. Not financial advice, plz dyor. CA: 0x49B1bcd92c2bd1551385684A5738761C4D017777 https://dexscreener.com/bsc/0xf7bcf4d5dd43754d56172d4201a5962402da825f Twitter/X

12 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC13 viewsread 12 August 2026

BSC TOKEN $BABYGROK BSC chain project, launched 4 minutes ago. Unknown team, so this is a high-risk project. It's better to just watch it for now. Current chart is $25.1K mc. Not financial advice, plz dyor. CA: 0x58BB556b98c5E01eE2A0BA2EA22B6Cc6Eb747777 https://dexscreener.com/bsc/0x44d255df141f4cc592c3d5cdb9e7a34cb5b0831e Twitter/X

12 Aug 2026, 01:30 UTC14 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

SOL TOKEN $TRENCHERS SOL chain project, launched 34 minutes ago. Unknown team, so this is a high-risk project. It's better to just watch it for now. Current chart is $34.4K mc. Not financial advice, plz dyor. CA: B8iU62RtdsreAjmLyifv1LcyLkv2eF9FtKBaRTxX2PnX https://dexscreener.com/solana/6jdeclvmnxukbge36ipvrxtcqochuuliske1ugadl1w9 Twitter/X

11 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC14 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

SOL TOKEN $DCN SOL chain project, launched 1 day ago. Unknown team, so this is a high-risk project. It's better to just watch it for now. Current chart is $24.8K mc. Not financial advice, plz dyor. CA: CUTFq2j7HXCMZzMxFgQpVuaCiH6Got3gzdZt7VyJpump https://dexscreener.com/solana/3yy4l3onj83nyhb7geueaaybggkmmqis2ou742cl2qrd Telegram Website Twitter/X

11 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC12 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

SOL TOKEN $VULTURE SOL chain project, launched 47 minutes ago. Unknown team, so this is a high-risk project. It's better to just watch it for now. Current chart is $27.1K mc. Not financial advice, plz dyor. CA: EwnWAmWfirvowCVaFsCFUgjdH5kbWZN8hsHvDSmHpump https://dexscreener.com/solana/e5sz4xgqbhsvl5pevemdgdmx9d3axpmujgsp7cnd1vyu Twitter/X

11 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC10 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

SOL TOKEN $TRAIN SOL chain project, launched 18 minutes ago. Unknown team, so this is a high-risk project. It's better to just watch it for now. Current chart is $38.6K mc. Not financial advice, plz dyor. CA: C453uSfER4XyLVnA7cBzVvLvjyf1opApfzdVZtVghmeF https://dexscreener.com/solana/4utzekkhtkdreuynamvfxmrakpjt3mdebgvegyqihhun Twitter/X

11 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC8 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

SOL TOKEN $ELEPHANT SOL chain project, launched 17 minutes ago. Unknown team, so this is a high-risk project. It's better to just watch it for now. Current chart is $39.8K mc. Not financial advice, plz dyor. CA: 6CzBFfRU9RUWKBuURaAHtgW7hMcpuLZ6Xq9WaB7zD8ZE https://dexscreener.com/solana/fxfux6kbkiir9dg6sabi7trwekqtqenhq6qrkhs1c1j Website Twitter/X

11 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC10 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @defaicreatorVideo

$ZEUS call of @MiniBangCall just passed 30x! 🔎 View Call 🔬 View Details 🎯 Maestro

11 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC10 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @defaicreatorVideo

$LOBO call of @MiniBangCall just passed 10x! 🔎 View Call 🔬 View Details 🎯 Maestro

Showing the 12 most recent of 111 posts we hold for @MiniBangCall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mini Bang Calls” (@MiniBangCall), 7,573 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MiniBangCall.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.