Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

LEE KNOW | LEE MINHO | STRAY KIDS

@MinhoSKZ

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

20,895subscribers

-145 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001314512965
TypeChannel
Username@MinhoSKZ
DescriptionИмя: Ли Минхо | Lee Minho | 이민호 Сценическое имя: Ли Ноу | Lee Know | 리노 | リノ Дата рождения: 1998.10.25 Позиция: Танцы Основная позиция: Танцы Stray Kids : @StrayKidsKpop по поводу рекламы : @ti_chan
Created2 January 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MinhoSKZ

Growth

20,89521,04020,967.56 August 2026 — 21,040 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,016 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,001 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,982 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,971 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,955 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,935 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,931 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,895 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 9 days, net -145. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,873–21,062 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 14:0820,895-36
13 Aug 2026, 02:3320,931-4
12 Aug 2026, 04:2620,935-20
11 Aug 2026, 02:1620,955-16
10 Aug 2026, 03:5420,971-11
9 Aug 2026, 05:0120,982-19
8 Aug 2026, 02:1721,001-15
6 Aug 2026, 23:5521,016-24
6 Aug 2026, 02:0521,040first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.23%
avg views ÷ 20,895 subscribers
Avg views / post
676
47 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
48
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held48 (4 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total31,765
Reactions total4,578
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
27,200
Videos
3,920
Links
1,140

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 06s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,125 reactions across 40 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,15876.6%
❤‍🔥48211.7%
💘2125.14%
💋922.23%
🥰531.28%
🍓511.24%
😈230.558%
👌190.461%
😍190.461%
🦄130.315%
🌭10.024%
👀10.024%
🙏10.024%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,578reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 47 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MinhoSKZ. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 48 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC280 views59 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🎞Video | 260814 какой цвет волос у минхо вам больше всего нравится? ⠀ я от всех без ума, особенно от синего- cr. aqwimoo » tags:#video ➖@MinhoSKZ➖

54❤‍🔥5

Signed Toxin Chaos.⁷ 🕷

14 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC476 views98 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

📷Photo | 260814 сегодняшние утренние фото Лино возле KBS. » tags:#photo ➖@MinhoSKZ➖

79❤‍🔥8💘7💋4

Signed Toxin Chaos.⁷ 🕷

14 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC574 views104 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

▫️Other | 260814 автор попросил сделать «кошачье сердечко», но Лино сначала показал «кошачьи ушки», а потом попытался сложить сердечко, но немного запутался. such cutie boy- 🐰 » tags:#other ➖@MinhoSKZ➖

88💋9😍5💘2

Signed Toxin Chaos.⁷ 🕷

14 Aug 2026, 04:59 UTC643 views124 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🖊Art | @.cherryleash ; @.ovalina_art good mo, kitties. 💐 » tags:#art ➖@MinhoSKZ➖

96❤‍🔥14💘8💋4😍2

Signed Toxin Chaos.⁷ 🕷

13 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC776 views149 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

📷Photo | 260813 Good night 🐱 » tags:#photo ➖@FelixSKZ➖ ➖@MinhoSKZ➖

❤‍🔥8744💘13🍓2💋2😍1

Signed imv

13 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC820 views151 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🎞️Video | 260813 Обожаю Минхо с этим цветом волос…🔥 cr. sorinyx » tags:#video ➖@MinhoSKZ➖

110❤‍🔥22💘12🥰5🍓1💋1

Signed imv

13 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC873 views138 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🖊️Art | @.wantsobee На недавнем эфире Минхо поделился, что каждый раз, когда он моет голову, цвет понемногу меняется «после мытья кажется, что у меня каждый день разный цвет волос» Вы когда нибудь красили волосы?🤩 » tags:#art ➖@MinhoSKZ➖

106❤‍🔥15😍11🥰3🍓1💋1💘1

Signed imv

13 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC848 views140 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

📷Photo | 260813 Good morning 💜 » tags:#photo ➖@MinhoSKZ➖

111❤‍🔥14💘9🍓2💋2🥰2

Signed imv

12 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC542 views5 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @di_padborka

‼️ ДО УДАЛЕНИЯ НАШИХ КАНАЛОВ ОСТАЛСЯ 1 ЧАС ты успел подписаться??? 😶‍🌫️ ❕ ITZY ❕ BLACKPINK ❕ BTS ⚜️ ФАНФИКИ ⚜️ ENHYPEN ❕ К-ПОП ❕ КОРЕЯ ⚜️ K-DRAMA ⚜️ SKZ ⚜️ TXT

2💘1😈1🙏1

Signed Diana

11 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC452 views6 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @di_padborka

⏰ на всякий случай напоминаем ‼️ 👀 мега с каналами всё ещё доступна — загляни, пока не закрыли 👍 💌 лучшее для стей > @STRAYKIDS 💌 все для мидзи > @ITZY 💌 каналы для моа > @TXT 💌 любителям bts > @BTS 💌 для истинных блинков > @BLACKPINK 💌 фанаты enhypen > @ENHYPEN 💌 дорамы и лакорны > @DORAMA 💌 топ к-поп группы > @K-POP 💌 лучшие фф каналы > @FANFIC 💌 все про Корею > @KOREA 🩷🩵🩷

3💘1🦄1😈1

Signed Diana

11 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC451 views5 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @di_padborka

⚠️ВНИМАНИЕ К ДЕТАЛЯМ: если ты сейчас открыл эту подборку — 🥸 закрывай её сразу 👎 там есть на что посмотреть и подписаться 😐 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤⤵️ 🤩 𝙁𝘼𝙉𝙁𝙄𝘾 - фанфики bts 🤩 ты до сих пор не нашел каналы с фф по бтс? тогда это твой шанс подписаться на каналы с разными фф ппейрингами, и окунуться в мир с лучшими, романтичными, горячие фанфиками😬жми 🌟 ITZY - уголок для мидзи 🤩 для мидзи мы нашли все л

5

Signed Diana

11 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC868 views129 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

📷Photo | 260811 Good night 🫐 » tags:#photo ➖@FelixSKZ➖ ➖@MinhoSKZ➖

107❤‍🔥11💋4🥰4💘2🍓1

Signed imv

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @MinhoSKZ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 237,221 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 52 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LEE KNOW | LEE MINHO | STRAY KIDS” (@MinhoSKZ), 20,895 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MinhoSKZ.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.