Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

💐диспач🐝

@dispatch_news

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

40,190subscribers

-161 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001457051122
TypeChannel
Username@dispatch_news
DescriptionН᧐ʙ᧐ᥴᴛᥙ 𐌺᧐ρᥱᥙ ᴛуᴛ. Вᥲɯ ᥙᥴᴛ᧐чнᥙκ н᧐ʙ᧐ᥴᴛᥱᥔ н᧐ⲙᥱρ ᧐дᥙн! Вᥴᥱ ᥴᥲⲙыᥱ ᥰᥱρʙыᥱ ᥙ ᥲκᴛуᥲ᧘ьныᥱ н᧐ʙ᧐ᥴᴛᥙ. @dis_patch_bot (по вопросам), @dis_new_vp (прайс) Бот для новостей: @dispatch_news_Bot Наш тт: http://tiktok.com/@dispatch_news
Created2 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dispatch_news

Growth

40,19040,35140,270.56 August 2026 — 40,351 subscribers6 August 2026 — 40,336 subscribers7 August 2026 — 40,317 subscribers8 August 2026 — 40,279 subscribers9 August 2026 — 40,248 subscribers10 August 2026 — 40,235 subscribers11 August 2026 — 40,215 subscribers12 August 2026 — 40,190 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -161. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,166–40,375 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 12:4740,190-25
11 Aug 2026, 15:5440,215-20
10 Aug 2026, 19:1340,235-13
9 Aug 2026, 17:4140,248-31
8 Aug 2026, 17:3840,279-38
7 Aug 2026, 14:4040,317-19
6 Aug 2026, 13:0140,336-15
6 Aug 2026, 02:0540,351first reading

Engagement

119 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.91%
avg views ÷ 40,190 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,580
119 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
119
of 119 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 118 of 119 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held119 (5 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total426,046
Reactions total37,286
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
136,000
Videos
3,280
Links
10,300

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
13m 02s
Average length
56s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

34,873 reactions across 110 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20,90559.9%
💘3,65810.5%
❤‍🔥2,1886.27%
💋1,0262.94%
🔥8482.43%
😭8412.41%
😐8042.31%
🍓7412.12%
🕊4721.35%
💅4141.19%
🥰4131.18%
🏆3711.06%
😴3521.01%
🤨3240.929%
💔2500.717%
😢1990.571%
🤯1910.548%
🤔1300.373%
😨1240.356%
👍1020.292%
19 further kinds5201.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 118 of the 119 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37,286reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 119 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 119 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dispatch_news. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 119 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC≈1,260 views136 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

[🗞] 12.08.26 ✎ CHAEYOUNG (TWICE) обвиняют в курении, где она появилась вчера на вечеринке FKA twigs 'Eusexua, Afterglow, Body High' в Сеуле. В сети распространился ролик со спины, где она якобы курит. Chaeyoung собиралась молчать, но многие говорили, что она курит сигарету, хотя на самом деле она просто пила свой напиток. Она написала в BUBBLE, что она не легкомысленна, чтобы делать это открыто перед таким количес

97🤨17🕊8🥰4😭3💘2🤔2💋1

Signed Linn Kim

12 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC≈2,780 views206 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

[🗞️] 12.07.26 ✎ Самые продаваемые группы, дебютировавшие в 2019 году (по состоянию на 8 августа 2026 года) 1. TXT — 21 283 498 проданных экземпляров 2. ITZY — 7 586 125 проданных экземпляров 3. WayV — 2 701 392 проданных экземпляров 4. ONEUS — 1 787 306 проданных копий 5. AB6IX — 1 375 553 проданных копий 6. EXO_SC — 961 509 проданных копий 7. CIX — 839 523 проданных копий 8. VERIVERY — 801 005 проданных копий 9. S

💘10873💋14🥰3❤‍🔥2🍓2😐2👍1

Signed bîtubie 🍦

12 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC≈3,040 views127 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

[📸] 11.08.26 ✎ NCT 127 представили концепт-фото к выходу 7-го полноформатного альбома «BLINGY» Релиз — 24 августа. › #kpop #group #nct127 #nct @dispatch_news

92❤‍🔥13💘10💋5🍓4😴2😐1

Signed fannie

12 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC≈3,230 views364 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

[🗞️] 12.07.26 ✎ Самые продаваемые группы, дебютировавшие в 2018 году (по состоянию на 8 августа 2026 года) 1. Stray Kids — 35 630 562 проданных экземпляров 2. ATEEZ — 14 765 261 проданных экземпляров 3. i-dle — 8 004 270 проданных экземпляров 4. NCT — 6 794 874 проданных копий 5. IZ*ONE — 2 124 514 проданных копий 6. BSS — 1 546 246 проданных копий 7. fromis_9 — 1 176 984 проданных копий 8. LOONA — 675 116 проданны

247❤‍🔥51💘37😐12💋6🍓5🥰2😴2

Signed ис ᵗʰⁱˢ ﹠ ᵗʰᵃᵗ

12 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC≈3,350 views261 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

[🎀] 12.08.26 ✎ С момента запуска ежедневного чарта MelOn Daily Chart в 2014 году было выпущено более 1560 альбомов различных групп. Только 1% из всех этих релизов смогли попасть абсолютно каждым своим треком в топ-100 ежедневного чарта платформы. За всю историю такого уникального результата добились всего 9 групп. NewJeans, aespa и TXT – единственные группы 4-го поколения в данном списке. ✎ TXT – единственный му

179🆒23🤨20💘14😐8❤‍🔥7💋4🫡3

Signed bîtubie 🍦

12 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC≈3,520 views123 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

[🗞️] 12.07.26 ✎ N.Flying объявили о возвращении с новым мини-альбомом «Still». Релиз – 1 сентября. › #kpop #group #nflying @dispatch_news

69💋30💘15❤‍🔥5🏆2👍1😐1

Signed ис ᵗʰⁱˢ ﹠ ᵗʰᵃᵗ

12 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC≈3,910 views399 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

[🗞] 13.08.26 ✎ В сети быстро разгорается крупный скандал: новые концепт-фото ENHYPEN обвиняют в плагиате концепт фото TXT «Thorns». После публикации официальных тизеров к грядущему камбэку ENHYPEN, пользователи Твиттера (X) обратили внимание на поразительное сходство их визуального стиля с весенним концептом «Thorns» группы ТХТ, который те представляли в рамках релиза «7TH YEAR». Поклонники массово сравнивают кадр

189😭112😐38👍21💔11🤨10💯7💘6

Signed bîtubie 🍦

12 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC≈1,650 views119 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

[🗞] 13.08.26 ✎ По сообщениям, MINHO (SHINee) вернётся в сентябре со своим вторым мини-альбомом. › #kpop #idol #minho #shinee @dispatch_news

92💘17🎉6🤩2🆒2

Signed bîtubie 🍦

12 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC≈2,170 views378 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

[🗞] 13.08.26 ✎ На сегодняшней трансляции Weverse V и Jungkook (BTS) рассказали о проблемах со здоровьем. V сообщил, что одно его ухо слышит лишь на 30%, тогда как другое сохраняет 100% слуха. По его словам, проблемы со слухом продолжаются уже около двух с половиной лет. Сейчас он проходит лечение, принимает лекарства и регулярно посещает больницу для контроля состояния. Jungkook рассказал, что его голень находится

😭258💔75🥰9😨9🙊8❤‍🔥5🤯5😍4

Signed bîtubie 🍦

12 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC≈2,270 views121 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

[📸] 12.08.26 ✎ BIGBANG представили концепт-фото к синглу «BiiiG». Релиз — 19 августа. › #kpop #group #bigbang @dispatch_news

🔥5040💋12💘6😐5🤩2😴2🍾1

Signed bîtubie 🍦

12 Aug 2026, 05:12 UTC≈2,370 views236 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

[🗞] 12.08.26 ✎ «SWIM» превысила 800 миллионов прослушиваний на Spotify. Это первая песня 2026 года и самая быстрая песня среди всех групп в истории, достигшая этого рубежа. ✎ Самые быстрые песни артистов K-pop, достигшие 800 миллионов прослушиваний на Spotify: 1. Seven / APT. - 78 дней 2. Who - 92 дня 3. SWIM - 144 дня 🆕 4. Dynamite - 232 дня › #kpop #group #bts @dispatch_news

🏆10865❤‍🔥25😐16💘11🍾5🎉2💋1

Signed bîtubie 🍦

11 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC≈4,240 views402 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

[🗞] 11.08.26 ✎ Самые прослушиваемые женские K-pop группы на Spotify в 2026 году на данный момент: 1. BLACKPINK — 1,287 млрд 2. TWICE —1,165 млрд 3. LE SSERAFIM — 1,156 млрд 4. ILLIT — 1,069 млрд 5. NewJeans — 841,34 млн 6. aespa — 824,16 млн 7. BABYMONSTER — 701,49 млн › #kpop #group @dispatch_news

275💘64❤‍🔥1712💋11😐9😴5🔥3

Signed fannie

Showing the 12 most recent of 119 posts we hold for @dispatch_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 43,435 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 39 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Stray Kids | JYP ️️
@StrayKids_JYP · 169,826
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“💐диспач🐝” (@dispatch_news), 40,190 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dispatch_news.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.