Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🌸 𝕸𝖎𝖑𝖆𝖘𝖘𝖎𝖐’𝖘 𝖍𝖔𝖚𝖘𝖊🧸

Channel

🌸 𝕸𝖎𝖑𝖆𝖘𝖘𝖎𝖐’𝖘 𝖍𝖔𝖚𝖘𝖊🧸

@Milassikshouse

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

44subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002301941398
TypeChannel
Username@Milassikshouse
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Milassikshouse

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

434443.510 August 2026 — 43 subscribers10 August 2026 — 43 subscribers19 September 2026 — 44 subscribers10 August 202619 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 40 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43–44 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 08:0044+1
10 Aug 2026, 17:0043no change
10 Aug 2026, 12:0143first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

75 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3445.3%
💘2330.7%
🍓1520.0%
💊34.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC8 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

˚₊‧꒰ა 𝖂𝕴𝕻 𓏵⊹˚.♡ ╭────── · · ୨୧ · · ──────╮ ♡ фрагмент из будущий анимации U・ᴥ・U ╰────── · · ୨୧ · · ──────╯ | #wip #tadc / *tik |

❤2

8 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC17 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

˚₊‧꒰ა 𝖈𝖔𝖓𝖈𝖊𝖕𝖙 ♡ ╭────── · · ୨୧ · · ──────╮ ♡концепт маскота ૮꒰ ˶• ༝ •˶꒱ა пока что это лишь тестовый дизайн(´・ω・`) я ещё думаю над акцентными оттенками - мне кажется что вместо берюзового подойдёт ещё кофейный или светло- оранжевый ₍ᐢ. ̫.ᐢ₎ но пока что склоняюсь к этому варианту ૮ ․ ․ ྀིა также мне кажется что ей не хватает оригинальности и узнаваемых элементов - над чём я и поработаю🩵(˶ˆ꒳ˆ˵) возможно я ей добавлю бо…

❤2🍓2💘1

5 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC28 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

⊹₊˚‧︵‿₊୨୧₊‿︵‧˚₊⊹ ╭───── · · ୨୧ · · ─────╮ Ну кароч моей подруге исполнилось 93 года (o^▽^o) в честь этого я нарисовала ей каракулю ╰───── · · ୨୧ · · ─────╯ ┊ ┊ ┊ ♡ ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ ♡ ⋆ ♡ ⋆ ┊ . + ♡ | #sketch / *tik |

💘4❤2🍓2

4 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC29 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @artinside_tgPhoto

😅 Боты среди нас | Под именами художников заводят фейковых ботов В последнее время в Telegram участились случаи, когда под именами художников создают ботов, мимикрирующих под их каналы. Они легко вылезают в поиске, при вводе названий каналов. В них предлагают купить якобы подписку за звезды. Схема, скорее всего, такая: Человек ищет канал художника в поиске, по ошибке натыкается на бота, думает, что это платная подп…

30 Jul 2026, 06:22 UTC36 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

˖⋆𐙚♡ ꒰ྀི১𝕸𝖆𝖌𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖑 𝖒𝖊𝖔𝖜 𝖒𝖊𝖔𝖜໒꒱ིྀ 𓏵 ⏔⏔⏔⏔⏔ ꒰ ᧔ෆ᧓ ꒱ ⏔⏔⏔⏔⏔ ⊹︶︶୨୧︶︶⊹︶︶⊹︶︶୨୧︶︶⊹ ℱ𝑜𝓇 𝒟𝒯ℐ𝒴𝒮 ᓚ₍⑅^..^₎♡ ⊹₊˚‧୨ ⏔⏔꒰ ᧔ 🧸ྀི ᧓ ꒱⏔⏔୧‧˚₊⊹ ⊹︶︶୨୧︶︶⊹︶︶⊹︶︶୨୧︶ ┊ ┊ ┊ ♡ ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ ˚ ♡ ┊ ┊ ♡ ⋆ + ♡ ⋆ ┊ . + ♡ | #art #nextfrideymagicalmeowmeow | *tik |

❤3💘2

27 Jul 2026, 08:58 UTC40 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

˚₊‧꒰ა 𝖂𝕴𝕻♡ ╭────── · · ୨୧ · · ──────╮ ♡ Извиняюсь за то что в последнее время много випов (╥ ω ╥) ╰────── · · ୨୧ · · ──────╯ | #wip #cookierun / *tik |

💘5

20 Jul 2026, 08:15 UTC49 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

˚₊‧꒰ა 𝖂𝕴𝕻♡ ╭────── · · ୨୧ · · ──────╮ ♡ Учусь рисовать в традишке ૮꒰ ˶• ༝ •˶꒱ა ╰────── · · ୨୧ · · ──────╯ | #wip #genshin / *tik |

❤3🍓2💘1

12 Jul 2026, 10:10 UTC55 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

˚₊‧꒰ა 𝖂𝕴𝕻♡ ╭────── · · ୨୧ · · ──────╮ ♡ Я немного завидую Кингеру ૮꒰ ˶• ༝ •˶꒱ა ╰────── · · ୨୧ · · ──────╯ | #wip #tadc / *tik |

❤4🍓1💘1

7 Jul 2026, 06:40 UTC56 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

˖⋆𐙚♡𝕾𝖍𝖊 𝖑𝖔𝖛𝖊𝖑𝖞꒰ྀི১ ໒꒱ིྀ 𓏵 ⏔⏔⏔⏔⏔ ꒰ ᧔ෆ᧓ ꒱ ⏔⏔⏔⏔⏔ ⊹︶︶୨୧︶︶⊹︶︶⊹︶︶୨୧︶︶⊹ ▶︎ •၊၊၊|။||| 0:10 ⊹₊˚‧୨ ⏔⏔꒰ ᧔ 🧸ྀི ᧓ ꒱⏔⏔୧‧˚₊⊹ ⊹︶︶୨୧︶︶⊹︶︶⊹︶︶୨୧︶ ┊ ┊ ┊ ♡ ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ ˚ ♡ ┊ ┊ ♡ ⋆ + ♡ ⋆ ┊ . + ♡ | #art #tadc | *tik |

💘2❤1🍓1

6 Jul 2026, 10:02 UTC51 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

⏝⊹⏝ㅤ꒰ა𝕰𝖛𝖎𝖑 𝕵𝖆𝖝໒꒱ㅤ⏝⊹⏝ ⏔⏔⏔ ꒰ ᧔ෆ᧓ ꒱ ⏔⏔⏔ ♡ My baby( • ⩊ • )Мне нравиться этот стиль так что я иногда буду в нём рисовать ⏔⏔⏔ ꒰ ᧔ෆ᧓ ꒱ ⏔⏔⏔ ┊ ┊ ┊ ♡ ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ ♡ ⋆ ♡ ⋆ ┊ . + ♡ | #art #tadc / *tik |

❤3🍓2💘1

3 Jul 2026, 10:16 UTC64 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

˚₊‧꒰ა 𝖂𝕴𝕻♡ ╭────── · · ୨୧ · · ──────╮ ♡ Випка (˶˃⤙˂˶) ╰────── · · ୨୧ · · ──────╯ | #wip #tadc / *tik |

❤7🍓3💘2

2 Jul 2026, 07:25 UTC62 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

✮ “𝕴𝖘𝖓’𝖙 𝕾𝖍𝖊 𝖑𝖔𝖛𝖊𝖑𝖞?”∶⊹˖ᯓ⭑ ▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀ ╭──────────.★..─╮ ♡ Мне нравиться трансгендерная версия Джекса( • ⩊ • )скоро с ней полноценный арт нарисую(o^▽^o) ╰─..★.──────────╯ ▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀ ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ ┊ ˚★⋆。˚ ┊ ┊ ┊ ⋆ ┊ ┊ ★⋆ ★⋆ . ˚ ˚★ | #art #tadc / *tik |

❤4🍓2💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Milassikshouse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🌸 𝕸𝖎𝖑𝖆𝖘𝖘𝖎𝖐’𝖘 𝖍𝖔𝖚𝖘𝖊🧸” (@Milassikshouse), 44 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Milassikshouse.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.