🗝🗝🗝

Channel
𓂃۶ৎ ℳ𝐢𝐝𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐢
@Midosti
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
205subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003843675227 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Midosti |
| Description | В браке с лучшими @MinelliDW Архив— @ArchiveMidosti Own — @Dora_2270 Начало: 15.02.2026 Конец:? |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Midosti |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:00 | 205 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 205 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 19.8%
- avg views ÷ 205 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 40.5
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.10%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 810 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 308
- Videos
- 3
- Links
- 58
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
13 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5424927445880960845 | 4 | 30.8% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 23.1% | |
| custom 5332782160950634268 | 2 | 15.4% | |
| custom 5332823289557450808 | 1 | 7.69% | |
| custom 5422499548113174711 | 1 | 7.69% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 7.69% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 7.69% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Midosti. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
˖ ݁𖥔 ݁˖ 𐙚 ˖ ݁𖥔 ݁˖ ★Хотите найти кого-то для коллаба? Может,вам нужна команда для проекта?☆ ★Или ваша душа художника желает найти такие общие задумки? 𝒚𝒐𝒖'𝒓𝒆 𝒘𝒆𝒍𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒆 𝒊𝒏... ✦𝗔𝗥𝗧 𝗖𝗢𝗟𝗟𝗔𝗕𝗦&𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗝𝗘𝗖𝗧𝗦 𝗦𝗘𝗔𝗥𝗖𝗛 И пусть каждый найдет,как воплотить свои идеи, а так же разделить их с другими!☆ ˖ ݁𖥔 ݁˖ 𐙚 ˖ ݁𖥔 ݁˖
Ну нет
Нет Фу, как так #Mido
custom 54249274458809608452
🫏🫏🫏
custom 54249274458809608451
Photo, posted without a caption
🙂🙂— За вчерашнее, теперь все видят, то что Мари должна сделать пак с Дримом
🙂🙂— Где реакции, господа
❤1
Следующий стикерпак будет либо с Б.джеком либо с Шики... #Tezy
❤1custom 53327821609506342681
Sticker, posted without a caption
┏⭑⸰ֺ╍╼╌╼.𖢆.♪ ๋࣭╺-╌┅╼╌⸰ֺ .𓏲࣪˖𝙉𝙀𝙒 𝙋𝘼𝘾𝙆!𝄒ִ ۫• ╎ ╾˙╌╼┅˙╍.╌╼╌╌.╼ ╎ ˋ˓⊹۫𝘊𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘦𝘳: 𝘔𝘪𝘴𝘢 𝘢𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘦┊ ˋ˓⊹۫𝘍𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘰𝘮: 𝘋𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘩 𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘦┊ ˋ˓⊹۫𝘈𝘥𝘮𝘪𝘯: #𝘛𝘦𝘻𝘺┊ ⸰ֺ╾╌╍╼╌.𖢉.♪ ๋࣭╾╍╼╌╾⸰ֺ⭑┛ — 𝐼 𝑇ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑘 𝐼'𝑣𝑒 𝐵𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 𝑊𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑔 𝐴𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑌𝑜𝑢 𝑇ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑊ℎ𝑜𝑙𝑒 𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒. #other #stickers #Misa
❤1🔥1custom 53327821609506342681custom 53328232895574508081custom 54224995481131747111custom 54249274458809608451
🤩🤩—ВИНСЕНТ МОЙ СЛАДЕНЬКИЙ СЫНОЧЕК НЯМНЯМНЯМЯНМЯНМЯ ТРЕБУЮ ЧАРЛЬЗА, БЕННЕТА И.. ФЕЛИКСА МНЕ НАДА
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Midosti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 328,613 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@artcollabsnprojectsearch · 51 postkanamafu stickers
@kanamafustickers · 151 post〖 k𑄈̸ܻ۫t𝑜͡k𝑜̸t𝛐ۣ𑂴⃪ܴۖ݉ ऽყℳ 𓈒ֵ۫ 𝔀ֵ̨۫͠𝔀̨۫.
@kotokotoSYM · 511 postׄ ꪆ୧ 𝑳𝒆𝒏 ᥊ 𝑮𝒖𝒎𝒊 𝘿𝙖𝙞𝙡𝙮 +ᶜᵒᶰᶠ
@Len_x_Gumi · 2491 postl𝗂⃨t⃕ꫀܵۜ݃𝘳͜͡ᨡl𝐥y 𝗺۫͜𝐞ֳܑ٘/u⃔𝐬⃪︩︪֟ .. ყɫ𝗍۫͜ժׁׅ݊/𝑛𝐞︩︪ۭkᨵׁׅׅρྀི۫ᥲֺ︩︪𝗿︩︪ɑׁׅ݊ ಌ
@nekoyttdus · 161 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@dabiBLog · 691 post[Event] DEADLOCK Web
@Deadlock_web · 221 post◟ˆ𝙆 ֺ⃝𝗜𝐎 | 𝗣𝗢𝗥𝗧 # 𓏵
@Hitwwf · 311 postkanamafu stickers
@kanamafustickers · 151 postׄ ꪆ୧ 𝑳𝒆𝒏 ᥊ 𝑮𝒖𝒎𝒊 𝘿𝙖𝙞𝙡𝙮 +ᶜᵒᶰᶠ
@Len_x_Gumi · 2491 post𓌔
@M1nnly · 141 postㅤ ⤷ 𝗆𝗲𝗹𝗅𖦹 ៸៸ 𝗱a͟͟i͟͟l͟͟ 𝘺 !
@mello_da1ly · 1121 post𓏵Вп Mido
@midostiVp · 111 postl𝗂⃨t⃕ꫀܵۜ݃𝘳͜͡ᨡl𝐥y 𝗺۫͜𝐞ֳܑ٘/u⃔𝐬⃪︩︪֟ .. ყɫ𝗍۫͜ժׁׅ݊/𝑛𝐞︩︪ۭkᨵׁׅׅρྀི۫ᥲֺ︩︪𝗿︩︪ɑׁׅ݊ ಌ
@nekoyttdus · 161 postПОЛУРЕСТ! 𝐍𝐨𝐨𝐛𝐆𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭 ~ ᴄᴏɴғᴇssɪᴏɴ
@ng666conf · 9991 post☁️ ; 𝘖𝘣𝘰𝘳𝘰 𝘚𝘩𝘪𝘳𝘢𝘬𝘶𝘮𝘰〔 𝘊𝘧 + 𝘋𝘢𝘪𝘭𝘺 〕
@OboroSCfD_90 · 811 postOuter wilds | Confession
@OuterWildsConf · 351 post♡ - 𝘴𝘪𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘭𝘪𝘭𝘺 𝑪𝐹ㅤִ 𔓕
@silent_lily_cf · 3551 postYES, I KINN *** AND I …
@YIKAI_BS7 · 1611 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Midosti named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𓂃۶ৎ ℳ𝐢𝐝𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐢” (@Midosti), 205 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Midosti.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.