2 measurements spanning 2 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 714–716 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 21:58
716
+2
23 Aug 2026, 08:15
714
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 9 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
33.5%
avg views ÷ 716 subscribers
Avg views / post
240
1 post measured
Reaction rate
15.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held
17 (9 April 2026 – 31 July 2026)
Views total
240
Reactions total
36
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
430 reactions across 17 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
195
45.3%
👍
85
19.8%
❤
76
17.7%
🤝
17
3.95%
👏
16
3.72%
🤩
13
3.02%
🥰
6
1.40%
💯
4
0.93%
✍
3
0.698%
❤🔥
3
0.698%
😁
3
0.698%
😍
3
0.698%
😱
2
0.465%
🙏
2
0.465%
👀
1
0.233%
👌
1
0.233%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 430reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Доброго утра, товарищи!
Ко мне «в руки» попала четвёртая серия Катехона, отредактированная, финальная к начитке!И вчера я закончил её запись
Осталось почистить дорожку, добавить музыку и звуковые эффекты
И тем временем, пятая серия находится на редактуре, т.е. в недалёком будущем и она встанет в очередь на запись
Хорошего всем пятничного дня!
Доброго вечера, товарищи!
Давным-давно, в 2022 году записал этот короткий рассказ. Так как это было практически самое начало моего пути в начитке рассказов, то искал я малую форму. И этот же аудиорассказ был первым нашим с Антоном творением!
Данная версия была записана спустя год повторно т.к. и спустя год мне сам рассказ очень понравился. Он легки и интригующий.
Приятного прослушивания!
Ричард Саксон - Послание
Добрейшего дня, товарищи!
Ииииии наконец-то видео загружено)Приятного всем прослушивания/просмотра!
В саду под крики ветра (2/5) | Олег Новгородов | Опольцево | История на ночь
https://youtu.be/Sc825cP4qP8
Доброго вечера, товарищи!
Завтра, во второй половине дня, на YT-канал будет загружен новый рассказ)По обыкновению, в ТГ-загружу аудиодорожку!
Всем легкого начала новой недели и всего хорошего!
Товарищи, доброго дня!
Из недавно просмотренного могу порекомендовать скоротать время вот эти два фильма
Значитъ, «Обсессия» - атмосферна и интересна. Камерный мистический триллер/ужастик. Главный женский персонаж отыграла на все 100%, жуть-жуткая.
Смотрел в качестве TS, может уже есть в достойном!
А «Закулисье реальности»…спорная синема. С одной стороны, думаю, что поклонникам оригинальной городской легенды не зай…
Доброго утра, товарищи!
Сегодня в 11:00 по мск на YT-канал будет загружен новый рассказ!
Давно его хотел начитать, и таки дошло дело и до него
Приятного просмотра/прослушивания!
По обыкновению сегодня будет загружена аудиодорожка сюда. Ориентировочно ~15:30-16:00 по мск
Хорошего всем дня!
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @MicBook1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
АБАДДОН. Аудиокниги. УЖАСЫ. МИСТИКА. ТРИЛЛЕРЫ. @abaddoyoutube · 57,128 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мик Бук” (@MicBook1), 716 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MicBook1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.