Channel
@Metodik_yordamlar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,457subscribers
-254 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001839598273 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Metodik_yordamlar |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Metodik_yordamlar |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 17:11 | 2,457 | -18 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 23:40 | 2,475 | -27 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 20:35 | 2,502 | -28 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 09:21 | 2,530 | -13 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 2,543 | -14 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:20 | 2,557 | -15 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 2,572 | -27 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:27 | 2,599 | -20 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 2,619 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 2,628 | -12 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:19 | 2,640 | -17 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:22 | 2,657 | -19 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 2,676 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 2,681 | -16 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 2,697 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:51 | 2,710 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 2,711 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 26 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
242 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 158 | 65.3% | |
| ❤ | 67 | 27.7% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 2.48% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 2.48% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 2.07% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 242 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Assalomu alaykum, ustozlar sizga ochig’ini aytsam, hozir avgust. Sentabrda esa metodika qidiradigan ustozlar juda ko‘payadi. Agar hozirdan 1 ta narxda 2 ta metodika olib qo‘ysangiz, bittasi o‘zingizga qoladi. Ikkinchisini esa keyin metodika kerak bo‘lib qolgan hamkasbingizga berishingiz yoki sotishingiz mumkin. Ya’ni bugun oldindan qilgan xarajatingiz keyin o‘zini oqlab beradi. Shu uchun ham bu aksiyani qo‘ydik.
❤8⚡3🔥1
Metodik yordamlar pinned «🚨TEKINGA METODIKA! Iloji bormi? Ha! ✅ 1 ta metodika pulini to’laysiz - 2 tasini olasiz. Bittasi o’zingizga, ikkinchisini esa hamkasbingizga soting. Tushgan pul bilan xarajatingiz qoplanadi va metodikangiz sizga tekinga tushadi! ✅ Aksiya faqat avgust oyi…»
🚨TEKINGA METODIKA! Iloji bormi? Ha! ✅ 1 ta metodika pulini to’laysiz - 2 tasini olasiz. Bittasi o’zingizga, ikkinchisini esa hamkasbingizga soting. Tushgan pul bilan xarajatingiz qoplanadi va metodikangiz sizga tekinga tushadi! ✅ Aksiya faqat avgust oyi uchun. ▶️ Hoziroq bron qiling: @JO_s_admin O’TGAN 2 YILLIK NATIJALAR: 👍@ommalashgan_ishlar
❤3👍2👏1🔥1
Hurmatli ustozlar! Esingizda bo'lsa huddi shunaqa xabarni o'tgan yili natijalar chiqqanda ham jonatganmiz va undan olingi yil ham va bu yil ham an'analarimizga sodiq qolgan xolda yozib joyladik. https://t.me/Metodik_yordamlar/240?single BU DAVOMIYLIK NIMANI BILDIRADI? BU ALBATTA ISHONCH! ISHONCH BILDIRGAN HAMMAGA RAHMAT! Agar ishingiz yuqori baholangan yoki ommalashgan bo‘lsa, natijalarni biz bilan ham ulashishni …
👍16👏1
2025-2026 o‘quv yili OMMALASHTIRISH NATIJALARI NATIJALARNI KO‘RISH UCHUN USTIGA BOSING!!! Shu kanalimizga natijalarni tashab boryapmiz, qiziq bo‘lsa kirib ko‘rishingiz mumkin. @ommalashgan_ishlar 2025-2026 o‘quv yilida ham ustozlarimiz juda yaxshi natijalarga erishishmoqda. Hozirgacha ko‘plab ishlar: ✅ viloyat bosqichida ✅ tuman bosqichida ✅ maktab miqyosida ommalashishga muvaffaq bo‘ldi. Hatto ayrim ustozlar ish…
👍3
Ko‘pchilik aytayotgandek “yangi nizom chiqdi, hammasi o‘zgardi” degan gap unchalik to‘g‘ri emas. Aslida yangi nizom biroz yengillashtirilgan, ayrim qoidalar esa birlashtirib yuborilgan xolos. Eng muhimi, siz oldindan tayyorlab qo‘ygan metodik ishlaringiz hozirgi yangi nizomga ham mos keladi. Shuning uchun xavotir olishga hojat yo‘q, @metodik_yordamlar rahmat😊
👍16❤9👏2
Aziz ustozlar mana to'liq sizga tartibini tushuntirib berdik, nafaqat tushuntirib berdik, hammasiga aniq aniq namunalar bilan keltirib berdik, bularni hammasi bepulga @Metodik_yordamlar kanali tamonidan bo'ldi. Bu bosqichlarni hammasini o'zingiz qilsangiz bo'ladi iltimos oddiy narsalarni pulga qildiraman deb kuyib qolmang! Biroz izlanish va o'rganish hammasiga yechib bo'la oladi! Hammaga omad😊
👍38❤9
#Oltinchi Metodik ishda nomi keltirilgan taqrizchini bergan taqrizi! USTOZLAR TAQRIZ MUAMMO EMAS ENG OSONI TAQRIZ YOZISH! METODIK ISHINGIZDA KIM TAQRIZCHI QILIB KELTIRILGAN BO'LSA OSHA ODAM BIR BETLI TAQRIZ YOZIB BERISHI KERAK. AGAR BILMAYDIGAN BO'LSA HAMMA ISHGA MOS TUSHADIGAN MANA BITTA SHABLON ISHLAB CHIQDIK. FAQAT KERAKLI QISMLARINI O'ZGARTIRIB OLSANGIZ BO'LADI. Hammasi metodik yordamlar bilan oson! https://t.m…
👍15❤10
#Beshinchi Antiplagiat dasturidan olingan sertificat! QUYIDAGI VIDEODA, METODIKANI QANDAY QILIB ANTIPLAGIATDAN O'TKAZIB QANDAY QILIB SERTIFICAT OLISH KO'RSATILGAN! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsmiEyTCAxw Hammasi metodik yordamlar bilan oson! https://t.me/Metodik_yordamlar 🔴NATIJALAR: @Ommalashgan_ishlar 🔴METODLAR: @Lampochka_metodlar 🔵MUROJAAT: @MY_tahrirchi
👍10❤1
#Tortinchi Diplom nusxasi! Hammasi metodik yordamlar bilan oson! https://t.me/Metodik_yordamlar 🔴NATIJALAR: @Ommalashgan_ishlar 🔴METODLAR: @Lampochka_metodlar 🔵MUROJAAT: @MY_tahrirchi
👍7👏2
#Uchinchi Obyektivka! Hammasi metodik yordamlar bilan oson! https://t.me/Metodik_yordamlar 🔴NATIJALAR: @Ommalashgan_ishlar 🔴METODLAR: @Lampochka_metodlar 🔵MUROJAAT: @MY_tahrirchi
👍7❤2
#Ikkinchi Metodik ishning elektron nusxasi! Hammasi metodik yordamlar bilan oson! https://t.me/Metodik_yordamlar 🔴NATIJALAR: @Ommalashgan_ishlar 🔴METODLAR: @Lampochka_metodlar 🔵MUROJAAT: @MY_tahrirchi
👍9❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Metodik_yordamlar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Metodik yordamlar” (@Metodik_yordamlar), 2,457 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Metodik_yordamlar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.