Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Metarhia Chief Level

Channel

Metarhia Chief Level

@MetarhiaChiefs

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

910subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 16 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001835200720
TypeChannel
Username@MetarhiaChiefs
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded16 September 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/MetarhiaChiefs

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 4 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

910923916.516 September 2026 — 923 subscribers16 September 2026 — 923 subscribers18 September 2026 — 922 subscribers3 October 2026 — 915 subscribers27 October 2026 — 914 subscribers3 November 2026 — 910 subscribers16 September 20263 November 2026
6 measurements spanning 48 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 908–925 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 13:19910-4
27 Oct 2026, 22:27914-1
3 Oct 2026, 23:59915-7
18 Sept 2026, 14:40922-1
16 Sept 2026, 10:22923no change
16 Sept 2026, 09:47923first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 31 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 12s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

184 reactions across 17 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6837.0%
❤4323.4%
🔥3116.8%
💯137.07%
🤣115.98%
🤷‍♂42.17%
🍾31.63%
🎉31.63%
😎21.09%
😢21.09%
🫡21.09%
🎅10.543%
🤯10.543%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 11 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Sept 2026, 07:32 UTC288 views8 reactionsread 16 September 2026
Forwarded from @HowProgrammingWorksPhoto

Инструмент для ревью нейрослопа уже позволяет генерировать md-файлы с задачами для агентов, это похоже на план выполнения, по которому агент идет, читает комментарии и TODO, ставит галочки, что сделано. А вы принимаете или не принимаете каждый фрагмент кода и режете код на отдельные коммиты в гите. https://github.com/tshemsedinov/metadiff

❤5👍2🔥1

3 Sept 2026, 05:23 UTC275 views7 reactionsread 16 September 2026
Forwarded from @HowProgrammingWorks

🧠 VSCode, Claude Code, Cursor, Codex: внутри у них один и тот же цикл. Он умещается в пару сотен строк. Сделал вам прототип: рабочий кодинг-агент на Node.js, целиком читаемый за один вечер. На агента 700 строк, инструменты 600 строк, остальной код terminal UI IDE конечно (~5k строк), его можно не читать вообще, никаких фреймворков. Внутри: - цикл модель - вызов инструмента - результат - снова модель - минимальная I…

❤4👍3

29 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC375 views10 reactionsread 16 September 2026
Forwarded from @HowProgrammingWorksVideo

Video, posted without a caption

❤4👍2🔥2😢2

28 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC541 views9 reactionsread 16 September 2026
Photo

Prototyping IDE with harness, terminal, execution sandbox, test runner, parallel execution and scheduling

👍5😎2❤1🔥1

20 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC717 views9 reactionsread 16 September 2026

Web page over WebSocket with live updates: - one WebSocket connection shared between all browser tabs through a Service Worker - same-origin resources loaded through WebSocket instead of separate HTTP requests - transparent interception of browser GET requests - Cache Storage used as a local resource layer - cached pages, JS, CSS and assets continue working offline - cache-first reads with WebSocket loading on cache…

👍4🔥3❤2

15 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC465 views18 reactionsread 16 September 2026
Forwarded from @metarhia

Slop Engineering Toolkit: - Neuroslop types - Security cosplay - Vibe architecture - Happy path tests - Unreviewed AI code - Dependency roulette - AI-generated docs for AI - Shipping without understanding - Complexity hidden behind clean syntax

🤣11❤4💯3

8 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC815 views10 reactionsread 16 September 2026

📦 [email protected] • Reworked Pool with exclusive Lease handles: privatized internals • Replaced internal LinkedList with public ListNode • Reworked List as a value/index facade over ListNode • Updated List public API: drop unneeded methods • Renamed ConsList.reverse to toReversed • Added Struct.immutable / Struct.mutable • Added Result class: container for value or error • Added ConsList…

🔥7🫡2❤1

21 Jul 2026, 05:21 UTC527 views14 reactionsread 16 September 2026
Forwarded from @HowProgrammingWorks

Что я понял по итогам работы над структурами данных для стандартной библиотеки Metarhia Это же классическая тема, но ее мало кто хорошо осваивает в наше время, тем более в мире JS/Web разработки и во времена, когда все пишет AI. И даже если учили и знают, как делать хотябы простейший список, то нет привычки его использовати и знания остаются аккадемической теорией, невосстребованными вообще, а в коде массивы и объек…

🔥9❤4👍1

17 Jul 2026, 06:13 UTC501 views16 reactionsread 16 September 2026
Forwarded from @HowProgrammingWorks

Трехконтурная разработка: вместо того, чтобы генерировать с помощью AI миллионы строк кода в одном репозитории можно разделить это на 2 или три цикла. Первый контур: технологический стек Здесь сосредоточены основные инженерные усилия: runtime, протоколы, хранение данных, безопасность, наблюдаемость производительность, управление памятью и конкурентностью, инфраструктура, стабильные контракты и точки расширения. Этот…

👍12🔥2❤1💯1

10 Jul 2026, 13:47 UTC446 views10 reactionsread 16 September 2026
Forwarded from @metarhia

A new set of data structures and containers will be published in metautil 6.0 release: https://github.com/metarhia/metautil For example Struct, Result, lisp-style immutable/mutable list, Queue, Deque, Stack, etc. For example: const Money = Struct.immutable('Money', { amount: 0, currency: 'USD', }); const price = Money.create({ amount: 120, currency: 'EUR', }); const discounted = price.fork({ amount: 10…

❤4👍4🔥2

2 Jul 2026, 08:12 UTC456 views7 reactionsread 16 September 2026
Forwarded from @HowProgrammingWorks

В этот четверг на созвоне сообщества Метархия обсудим Стартап инкубатор Meta Qube Основные его идеи: - с AI стало возможно делать стартапы малыми силами и вложениями - ИТшники до уровня синьора не могут найти работу, решение - стартап - начинающим негде получить первый опыт, решение - стартап - синьоры и архитекторы сейчас часто предпочитают сделать свой продукт вместо того, чтоб работать на дядю - инвесторы хотели…

👍5❤1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @MetarhiaChiefs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Jun 2026, 14:34 UTCAnonymous Poll1,250 voters approx.

How do you use AI?

  1. I commit AI code after review28%
  2. I commit AI code unread7%
  3. I use AI for my code review only3%
  4. I use AI for generation and review38%
  5. I use AI for prototyping only6%
  6. I use AI for tests/docs/refactoring12%
  7. I do not use AI6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 11 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

English Sunday Online - English speaking club 🗣
@english_sunday_greenforest · 36,346
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Metarhia Chief Level” (@MetarhiaChiefs), 910 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MetarhiaChiefs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.