πͺΆ $BOWYER Aped this one, i tested the bot it works pretty gucci. Lately, Virtual launches are horrendous but it's kinda low so took my chances. https://github.com/BowyerApp/bowyer 0xaF4C10fEf50059d1e3E8aB1C80E46DB6A76098B4

Channel
π ππ¦π¦πππβπ¦ ππ₯πππ΅
@MessiahsCrib
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
696subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002641023790 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MessiahsCrib |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MessiahsCrib |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 696 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 705 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 705 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 24 May 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 2.59%
- avg views Γ· 696 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 18.0
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- β
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 20 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (24 May 2026 β 20 July 2026) |
| Views total | 54 |
| Reactions total | β |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 35s
- Average length
- 35s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
πͺΆ $APPLCAT Just woke up and aped this. Meme + RWA is a narrative I like, and seeing Vlad mention it gave me another reason to take a look. Not an early entry like the usual CRIB gems, it's already had a decent move. Don't chase green candles. DYOR. https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x4bed05783e5a478cdcf84517f0a19645b26b32d3
πͺ $p0 Grabbed a bag. Solid tech. The only thing holding it back, in my opinion, is the Bags App launch. On a stronger launchpad, this could've had a much bigger send. Either way, I'm bullish on the vision and will be watching this closely. The OS for creators π https://x.com/Crypto_Litty/status/2078053547174703418 https://dexscreener.com/solana/i1qcvutpv37h6wnqzq3etac3oye9ksjjs7rxa4j7prp
πͺ $TCG Tried this too, dev tweeted ca and i see he is followed by Toly etc. https://x.com/dacrooter/status/2068367532487303484 BAMGUGnziBb57SVRjmrFwg23Rsi7mx4JwkXUzoSYJsR7
πͺ $HermesWorld Bought this some, yeah not an ideal entry though. https://x.com/outsource_ this dude built built an AI game studio and it's shipping a real MMORPG. But seeing gaming tokens doing pretty well rn on Solana chain so giving it a shot. https://dexscreener.com/solana/bgxr3rhzmq215fneunctzrfar6nyec3kpngfuc9lmg7h
Officially under 1 month left to take advantage of this: MetaWinβs largest airdrop ($4M) is happening in July & everyone that deposits on metawin.com qualifies for it. Pretty crazy upside if you already gamble too. Iβd deposit a $20 minimum and do a couple spins. Best case you turn $3 to 20k like this guy, worst case you still get an airdrop. GL!
πͺ $Sv151 Either moons, or rugs so dont send me death threads if it rugs haha. Am taking my chances, may be launched by meteora team (no official ca yet) Tokenomics: 80% of supply, sold at $200K market cap, to raise $160K USDC to buy SV151. 10% in post-migration liquidity, paired against $20K in liquidity == market cap will be $200K 10% linear vest 1 year, on Jupiter Lock, used to increase capital backing the token β¦
π΅ $ATBASH Been watching it since 2, 3 days and just now taking my position in it. Basically the final guardrail before an AI agent can execute anything irreversible. It checks user-defined βred linesβ (policies on data access, payments, prompt injection risks, etc.) and then allows, holds, or blocks the action. Agents route red-line actions through Atbash, get an on-chain decision, and everything is auditable lateβ¦
πͺ $Hello? Just degenning some here, market is bad or should say trash, btc got Sellored ππ https://dexscreener.com/solana/evcwq9hmyeshupqgpkl7y9vfpfj6x1uuhnhexntnj92w
πͺ $FCM Aped a small bag here. Looks like theyβre trying to build a full football ecosystem, and with the World Cup getting closer, this narrative could get a lot more attention. Theyβve also started getting footballers onboard, which could help push more eyes toward the project over time. Definitely one to keep on the watchlist. DEX: https://dexscreener.com/solana/rxfkdunvinpubdzdyn68rtm3bh2t9s5jytpai8e4zbi Websβ¦
πΉ ETH β $DOGEUS Said to be launched by the same deployer behind $KEKIUS, which previously ran into the few hundreds of millions. Looks like the clog/distribution phase is almost over, but still β DYOR. CA: 0x759f8b83db57033aed95545694f6ada480b6e987 Chart: DEX Screener TG: TheDogeusMaximus Telegram Video: X Video Post As always with fresh ETH memes, be careful of fake pairs and copycats using similar names/contβ¦
πͺ $ZINC Aped a small bag of this. Launched yesterday I think, and the chart looks like itβs starting to stabilize now. Been seeing some solid followers around it too. Itβs a private proof-of-work mining protocol built on Solana, powered by MetaDAO and Arcium. Definitely an interesting narrative with the confidential mining angle. DEX: DEX Screener Website: ZINC Powered by: Arcium
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @MessiahsCrib. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank β 895,890 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ ππ¦π¦πππβπ¦ ππ₯πππ΅β (@MessiahsCrib), 696 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MessiahsCrib.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.