Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ㅤadpt ркст

@MerridewJack

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

115subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002307104596
TypeChannel
Username@MerridewJack
Descriptionбуквально jekc nerib
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/MerridewJack

Growth

1158 Aug 2026, 11:17 — 115 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 05:47 — 115 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:179 Aug 2026, 05:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 114–116 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 05:47115no change
8 Aug 2026, 11:17115first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 13 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
20
Videos
1
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2s
Average length
2s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

345 reactions across 16 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10931.6%
custom 54494982837664649353610.4%
custom 5289979255613068053246.96%
custom 5287567708785775360216.09%
custom 5206224794885842800164.64%
custom 5244856101568002226164.64%
custom 5267091392072528865164.64%
custom 5287729319815190155154.35%
custom 5283103451058835697144.06%
🙏144.06%
custom 5287290640445510388133.77%
custom 5256242699819847642102.90%
❤‍🔥82.32%
🍓61.74%
custom 528977442432775428251.45%
💘51.45%
🌚30.87%
🤮30.87%
🔥20.58%
😇20.58%
6 further kinds72.03%

Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 345reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2026 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
112
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 18 we hold a reading for · 83%
Most on one post
30
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MerridewJack. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 February 2026 to 11 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Jul 2026, 07:52 UTC83 viewsread 9 August 2026

я как бы начал вчера, но мне стало лень

11 Jul 2026, 07:48 UTC88 viewsread 9 August 2026

ребята я могу вам что нибудь нарисовать например ностеров и да приветик

4 Jun 2026, 17:09 UTC421 views17 reactions10 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

немножко джек

custom 526709139207252886583custom 52448561015680022263🌚1custom 52062247948858428001custom 52875677087857753601

28 May 2026, 06:51 UTC459 views18 reactions10 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

разнообразный контент 🥀

custom 544949828376646493584🌚2💘2custom 52448561015680022261custom 52875677087857753601

25 May 2026, 16:07 UTC424 views17 reactions10 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

то реально страш

11custom 52875677087857753603custom 54494982837664649352custom 52448561015680022261

10 May 2026, 05:43 UTC565 views32 reactions13 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

посмотрите.и забудте.

custom 544949828376646493515custom 520622479488584280084custom 52448561015680022262💘1🤗1🥰1

13 Apr 2026, 03:56 UTC778 views32 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

Лайт знаете ли вы что Ягами наоборот айм э гец

🙏14custom 528997925561306805363💘2🤮2😨2custom 52448561015680022262custom 52875677087857753601

5 Apr 2026, 15:32 UTC853 views25 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

Вот давайте я просто скину симба

custom 5283103451058835697124custom 52062247948858428004custom 52448561015680022264🍓1

27 Mar 2026, 14:55 UTC766 views20 reactions3 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Мой маленький вкусненьуой малцшочек

14🔥2custom 52899792556130680532custom 52670913920725288651custom 52877293198151901551

17 Mar 2026, 13:02 UTC632 views31 reactions5 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я тупейшее создание. Задавайте вопросз

17❤‍🔥5custom 54494982837664649354🤮1custom 52062247948858428001custom 52448561015680022261custom 52670913920725288651custom 52875677087857753601

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @MerridewJack. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,105,036 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ㅤadpt ркст” (@MerridewJack), 115 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MerridewJack.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.