Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

XXII Менделеевский Съезд

@MendeleevCongress2024

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,008subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002024762850
TypeChannel
Username@MendeleevCongress2024
Created1 February 2024measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MendeleevCongress2024

Growth

1,0081,0091,008.57 August 2026 — 1,009 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,009 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,008 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,008–1,009 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 17:051,008-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:331,009no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:541,009first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.2%
avg views ÷ 1,008 subscribers
Avg views / post
486
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 5 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026
Posts held5 (16 July 202617 July 2026)
Views total2,429
Reactions total26
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
32s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

26 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1246.2%
🔥1038.5%
🥰27.69%
🍾13.85%
😍13.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2026, 18:27 UTC340 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @government_rusPhoto

Валерий Фальков принял участие в церемонии вручения премии ЮНЕСКО – России имени Д.И.Менделеева Учрежденная по инициативе России в 2019 году премия остается единственной международной наградой в области фундаментальных наук. Она присуждается сразу 2 лауреатам в знак признания их выдающихся открытий, прорывных инноваций, а также активных усилий в деле популяризации фундаментальных наук. В этом году лауреатами стали п

3🍾1

17 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTC295 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @unescorussianPhoto

Профессор Пан Цзяньвэй (Китайская Народная Республика) и профессор Сергей С. Шейко (Соединённые Штаты Америки и Российская Федерация) стали лауреатами третьей Международной премии ЮНЕСКО–России имени Д. И. Менделеева за достижения в области фундаментальных наук. Международная премия ЮНЕСКО-России имени Д. И. Менделеева за достижения в области фундаментальных наук была учреждена государствами-членами ЮНЕСКО в 2019 го

4

17 Jul 2026, 14:05 UTC≈1,190 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🏅Главную международную премию в области фундаментальных наук вручили в Париже 17 июля в штаб-квартире ЮНЕСКО состоялась III церемония вручения Международной премии ЮНЕСКО–России имени Дмитрия Ивановича Менделеева — выдающегося русского учёного, создателя Периодической системы химических элементов, чьи идеи стали фундаментом современной науки и продолжают вдохновлять новые поколения исследователей по всему миру. Лау

🔥51

17 Jul 2026, 11:10 UTC281 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Прямо сейчас: церемония вручения III Международной премии ЮНЕСКО-России имени Д.И. Менделеева – одной из самых престижных мировых наград в области фундаментальных наук! Подключаетесь к прямой трансляции🏅

🔥2🥰1😍1

16 Jul 2026, 17:04 UTC323 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В ЮНЕСКО представили выставку о российской науке! Сегодня в штаб-квартире ЮНЕСКО в Париже открылась выставка, приуроченная к торжественной церемонии награждения лауреатов III Международной Менделеевской премии ЮНЕСКО–России в области фундаментальных наук. Гости узнают об открытиях Дмитрия Менделеева, достижениях российских учёных и их вкладе в международные научные программы. В экспозиции — материалы о космических

4🔥3🥰1

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @MendeleevCongress2024. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,076,379 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“XXII Менделеевский Съезд” (@MendeleevCongress2024), 1,008 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MendeleevCongress2024.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.