Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Men Rights India - Judgments / Updates

@MenRightsIndia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

873subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001464653331
TypeChannel
Username@MenRightsIndia
DescriptionPublic channel for judgments/news related to men's rights and Legal Terrorism against men To join Q&A group & free resources:👉menrightsindia.net/links Paid group: 👉https://rpy.club/g/JvJQxR77UG Consult 1-1: 👉man2man.in For education only
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/MenRightsIndia

Growth

8737 Aug 2026, 22:05 — 873 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:16 — 873 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 22:058 Aug 2026, 01:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 872–874 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 01:16873no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:05873first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 873 subscribers
Avg views / post
109
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held20 (23 May 20261 August 2026)
Views total327
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
39
Videos
1
Links
700

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 06:52 UTC101 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

"Embraced freedom" - statement by lawyer Kapil Sibal is shown as part of news headline - gives the impression that Supreme Court said it Omar Abdullah & Wife Agree To Dissolve Marriage, File Application In Supreme Court https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/omar-abdullah-wife-agree-to-dissolve-marriage-file-application-in-supreme-court-543741

31 Jul 2026, 07:41 UTC110 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @bar_and_bench

Hearing 30-40 criminal cases involving advocates daily: Madras HC calls for study on number of lawyers with criminal cases The Court asked the Bar Council of India and the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry to conduct the survey. https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/hearing-30-40-criminal-cases-involving-advocates-daily-madras-hc-calls-for-study-on-number-of-lawyers-with-criminal-cases

30 Jul 2026, 14:21 UTC116 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @bar_and_bench

Supreme Court pulls up Uttarakhand High Court judge for hearing former client’s case The judge ought not to have heard the matter after having previously represented the company, even if the issues involved in the two cases were different, the Court said. https://www.barandbench.com/news/supreme-court-pulls-up-uttarakhand-high-court-judge-for-hearing-former-clients-case

28 Jun 2026, 19:14 UTC265 viewsread 8 August 2026

Gauhati High Court Upholds Closure Of Plaintiffs' Evidence After 11 Adjournments, Lack Of Due Diligence https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/gauhati-high-court/evidence-closed-due-to-delay-repeated-adjournments-no-due-diligence-539112

28 Jun 2026, 19:13 UTC234 viewsread 8 August 2026

'Res Judicata Cannot Be Applied Rigidly To Interlocutory Procedural Orders Like Restoring Cross-Examination': Uttarakhand High Court https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/uttarakhand-high-court/uttarakhand-high-court-rejects-challenge-allowing-cross-examination-second-application-539084

28 Jun 2026, 18:57 UTC185 viewsread 8 August 2026

Stabbing Husband During Sudden Fight Falls Under Exception To Murder: Telangana High Court Modifies Wife's Sentence To Fine https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/telangana-high-court/telangana-high-court-wife-stabbed-husband-conviction-reduced-to-fine-533693

28 Jun 2026, 18:53 UTC163 viewsread 8 August 2026

Wife's Remark That She Could Have '1000 Husbands' Amounted To Grave And Sudden Provocation: MP High Court Alters Man's Conviction https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madhya-pradesh-high-court/204-part-1-ipc-conviction-altered-to-section-304-ii-ipc-wife-1000-husbands-grave-sudden-provocation-539088

23 Jun 2026, 03:48 UTC241 viewsread 8 August 2026

Won't Spare If Registry Has Misplaced Files : CJI Surya Kant Takes Serious View Of Lawyer's Complaint https://share.google/ZVveDoTitcr310dcC

16 Jun 2026, 08:54 UTC273 viewsread 8 August 2026

The PIL argues that the benefit is available regardless of economic status, allowing affluent women to travel free while economically weaker male passengers continue to pay fares. The petitioner claims that such a distinction lacks a rational nexus with any legitimate welfare objective and cannot be justified merely as a special provision for women under Article 15(3) of the Constitution. PIL Filed In Kerala High Co

14 Jun 2026, 07:56 UTC235 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Shows two common techniques used by feminists when faced with logic. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYekl7UqQCh/?igsh=em04cm1mYzVtemZ3

11 Jun 2026, 14:38 UTC232 viewsread 8 August 2026

Arguing before a trial court is like playing a Test match, while appeals are like IPL matches: Madras High Court - The Hindu https://share.google/irWCStJNbhOD46SOL

7 Jun 2026, 08:59 UTC255 viewsread 8 August 2026

Criminal Court not functus officio post issuing investigation direction: Rajasthan HC | SCC Times https://share.google/F7aCzEPndVp6uC4IJ

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MenRightsIndia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Men Rights India - Judgments / Updates” (@MenRightsIndia), 873 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MenRightsIndia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.