everybody’s cashing out everything. stocks. crypto. memecoins. retirement accounts. couch cushion money. grandma’s birthday check. all to ape into SPCX IPO
Signed benedmir

Channel
@MemeconomyCALLS
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
517subscribers
-23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001673461180 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MemeconomyCALLS |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MemeconomyCALLS |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 517 | -23 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 540 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:50 | 540 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
everybody’s cashing out everything. stocks. crypto. memecoins. retirement accounts. couch cushion money. grandma’s birthday check. all to ape into SPCX IPO
Signed benedmir
BREAKING: Bitcoin crashes under $60,000 @WatcherGuru
Signed benedmir
we cooked, fam.
Signed benedmir
social engineering on steriods bro... and its genius
Signed benedmir
doesnt have to be attacks... just simply out trading us
Signed benedmir
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed benedmir
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed benedmir
Layer 1: Sentiment scrapers reading 140,000 tweets per minute. Before a rumor becomes a headline, the position is already built. Layer 2: Exchange bridges. The bot sees BTC move on Coinbase, calculates Polymarket impact, and executes. Total latency: 80ms. Your finger hasn't touched the screen yet. Layer 3: Behavioral modeling. They know retail traders panic-sell at -15%. So they push prices to -14.8%. Wait. Then bu…
Signed benedmir
agents have the data... behavioral data for one
Signed benedmir
there's no strategy against agents who sees your cards, knows your tells, and moves before you think
Signed benedmir
how to defend? we simply have to stop talking about it on the internet..... idk how thats gonna work bro
Signed benedmir
whats actually stopping bitcoiners from doing this at scale? spin up unlimited ai agents.. each with wallets and nodes. inflating btc activity and locking supply out of circulation. this timeline’s getting crazy.
Signed benedmir
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MemeconomyCALLS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@MemeconomyCALLS named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Meme Calls” (@MemeconomyCALLS), 517 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MemeconomyCALLS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.