Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝓶𝓸𝓸𝓷𝓵𝓲𝓰𝓱𝓽 🌘

@MemMOONLIGHT

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

181subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003003459143
TypeChannel
Username@MemMOONLIGHT
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MemMOONLIGHT

Growth

18112 Aug 2026, 16:32 — 181 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 06:06 — 181 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 16:3213 Aug 2026, 06:06
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 180–182 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:06181no change
12 Aug 2026, 16:32181first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
72.2%
avg views ÷ 181 subscribers
Avg views / post
131
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held20 (15 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total2,482
Reactions total198
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
0s
Average length
0s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

212 reactions across 20 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 6.60% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5976366122444791508146.60%
custom 5996976596756471163136.13%
custom 5231316543584898021125.66%
custom 5377524488835451539125.66%
custom 5881842018337954432125.66%
custom 5882035764312676935125.66%
custom 5951533330208921744125.66%
custom 6030388075064990228125.66%
custom 5251459523591297329115.19%
custom 5319238986605034215115.19%
custom 5892987235132774774115.19%
custom 5949532738737416557104.72%
custom 5951578732308207470104.72%
custom 5974506109547846151104.72%
custom 6033115379297949096104.72%
custom 594978712535538711194.25%
custom 524895620619778924883.77%
custom 524899946081343082483.77%
custom 605070335197944894383.77%
custom 595430939950056224773.30%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 212reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MemMOONLIGHT. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC27 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ii_a_eFile

🤩♫ 🤩🤩🤩🤩 ⁠⁠⁠⁠ㅤㅤㅤㅤ

custom 597450610954784615110

Signed هـديـل🧚🏻‍♀️

10 Aug 2026, 00:28 UTC42 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 603311537929794909610

Signed هـديـل🧚🏻‍♀️

8 Aug 2026, 23:07 UTC47 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

كيف وجدتُها بين الزحام؟ أيّ زحام وأنا لم أرى سِواها؟

custom 595153333020892174412

Signed .⚜️

8 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC56 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

هايييي شو عم تعملو لتعبو وقتكن غير الدراسة لأن ماعندي 💆‍♀

custom 59543093995005622477

Signed هـديـل🧚🏻‍♀️

8 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC57 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

قد كنتُ طفلةً تلعب تحت شجرة بيتنا.. من غرس كل هذهِ السنوات في صدري ؟

custom 594953273873741655710

Signed هـديـل🧚🏻‍♀️

6 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC84 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

.

custom 60507033519794489438

Signed هـديـل🧚🏻‍♀️

4 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC96 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

لقد تركت مقعدك شاغِرًا، وانا أسعى في محاولة بائسة لحجزه عن الجميع.

custom 595157873230820747010

Signed هـديـل🧚🏻‍♀️

2 Aug 2026, 22:24 UTC118 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ارزقني بمن يتخطّى زِحام الجالسين ليكون بجواري.

custom 603038807506499022812

Signed هـديـل🧚🏻‍♀️

2 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC116 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @ALGAMALNA

في هذا العالم، لا شيء يُمنح بالمجان، سوى الخيبات، والمواعيد التي لا تأتي، والأماني التي تذبل قبل أن تنضج، والحنين... ذلك الحنين الذي لا يسألك إن كنت قادرًا على التحمل.

custom 588203576431267693512

Signed هـديـل🧚🏻‍♀️

2 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC115 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

.

custom 588184201833795443212

Signed هـديـل🧚🏻‍♀️

30 Jul 2026, 18:16 UTC149 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

انجرافك نحوَ القطيع الضّال تحت مبدأ : "الكل يفعل ذلك" يسلب منكَ خُصالك كانسان ميّزه اللّٰه بالعقل

custom 59497871253553871119

Signed هـديـل🧚🏻‍♀️

28 Jul 2026, 21:01 UTC131 views11 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

أعرفُ جيّداً كَيفَ أكونُ اتِّساعاً لِمَنْ أرادَني، وكيفَ أكونُ عَدَماً لِمَنْ اسْتَهانَ بي لا أنصافَ حُلولٍ لديّ.

custom 531923898660503421511

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MemMOONLIGHT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,363,838 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝓶𝓸𝓸𝓷𝓵𝓲𝓰𝓱𝓽 🌘” (@MemMOONLIGHT), 181 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MemMOONLIGHT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.