Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
Inscription : “Elite Landhep” |Fig, 1976.
@Melviinger
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
51subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002007873476 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Melviinger |
| Description | .. “lunavelle“ | ❥. A maiden of timeless luminance, her wisdom flows like silver rivers beneath the moon. From the sacred lineage of Melvinger, she weaves the forgotten threads of beauty, truth, and grace into the night’s eternal tapestry ˒˓ ꓹ ֹ |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Melviinger |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 51 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 51 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 57.8%
- avg views ÷ 51 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 29.5
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 11.2%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (25 June 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 236 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 49
- Videos
- 14
- Links
- 13
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 16s
- Average length
- 16s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
26 reactions across 4 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5314539098382296655 | 4 | 15.4% | |
| custom 5438127619843307616 | 4 | 15.4% | |
| custom 5436017579720198186 | 3 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5190740368336895726 | 2 | 7.69% | |
| custom 5436142047872434986 | 2 | 7.69% | |
| custom 5440663712132252677 | 2 | 7.69% | |
| custom 5442885674808129842 | 2 | 7.69% | |
| custom 6262306529408458695 | 2 | 7.69% | |
| custom 6289445835046392138 | 2 | 7.69% | |
| custom 6289788345803344950 | 2 | 7.69% | |
| custom 6289401107256970788 | 1 | 3.85% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Coastal Reverie.🌸 .. Female : My Dream Cart (2/8). With the warmth of the seaside still lingering upon our hearts, we wandered through charming coastal boutiques and sunlit cafés, filling our dream cart with a 🤩. breezy blush dress, a woven straw bag, radiant makeup, a delicate hand mirror, a favorite novel, a graceful surfboard, a wide-brimmed hat.. (👒) comfortable sandals,…
custom 62897883458033449502custom 53145390983822966551custom 62623065294084586951custom 62894458350463921381
🛍🛍🛍🛍
Channel name was changed to «Where every carefully chosen piece promised to make each seaside moment feel even more beautiful, effortless, and unforgettable.»
Channel name was changed to «FEMALE &,.. : 🛒 Our dream cart became a collection of summer essentials and little luxuries.»
Channel name was changed to «As our footsteps drifted from the waves, the charm of the coastal town welcomed us with countless little delights to discover.»
Sticker, posted without a caption
🤩 Where Love Meets The Tide (L & S. 28') As the golden sun slowly melted into the horizon, painting the sky in delicate hues of blush, coral, and amber, we wandered hand in hand along the shoreline, letting the gentle waves brush against our feet while the ocean breeze carried our quiet laughter into the endless sea🌸◟₊⠁ 🤩 ── Every fleeting glance, every shared smile, and every lingering embrace became a tre…
custom 53145390983822966551custom 62623065294084586951custom 62894011072569707881custom 62894458350463921381
Sticker, posted without a caption
VOL I 🌸 MALIBU BEACH — 1928s Summer unfolded in hues of blush and champagne, where the sea cradled 🤩 every lingering thought, &— each sunlit tide became a quiet reminder that elegance is not worn. it is found in the gentle rhythm of waves, the fragrance of salted air, (&.) the bliss of an unhurried heart ─── Blush Horizons🌸
custom 53145390983822966552
Sticker, posted without a caption
Channel name was changed to «Hand in hand, we found a seaside sanctuary where every wave quietly celebrated the beginning of our summer together.𑁤»
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Melviinger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,050,107 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Inscription : “Elite Landhep” |Fig, 1976.” (@Melviinger), 51 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Melviinger.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.