Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مهرداد

Channel

مهرداد

@MehrdadNaeimi

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

993subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001008989564
TypeChannel
Username@MehrdadNaeimi
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MehrdadNaeimi

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “مهرداد نعیمی — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

9869989926 August 2026 — 986 subscribers6 August 2026 — 986 subscribers14 August 2026 — 998 subscribers23 August 2026 — 993 subscribers9936 August 202623 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 984–1,000 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 02:18993-5
14 Aug 2026, 19:33998+12
6 Aug 2026, 17:17986no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:59986first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.7%
avg views ÷ 993 subscribers
Avg views / post
335
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (30 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,673
Reactions total189
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,025 reactions across 20 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
39938.9%
👍38337.4%
👏484.68%
🔥393.80%
❤‍🔥333.22%
😍272.63%
👎141.37%
😢131.27%
😁111.07%
👌90.878%
🐳80.78%
👀60.585%
💔60.585%
😭60.585%
🍾30.293%
🤔30.293%
🤩30.293%
🥴30.293%
👾20.195%
🤣20.195%
6 further kinds70.683%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,025reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MehrdadNaeimi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 22:05 UTC264 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

کمی با من مدارا کن مهستی به نظرم از بقیه بهتر خونده این ترانه رو

19🐳3

5 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC271 views37 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

با توجه به اینکه رادیو سیتکام در کستباکس فیلتر شده، اگه داخل ایران هستید می‌تونید در فیدیبو بدون فیلترشکن به پادکست گوش بدید و اگه خارج از ایران هستید همون کستباکس و اسپاتیفای و اپل پادکست همچنان بهترین گزینه هستند.

24💔6🐳2👎2🤨2👍1

5 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC278 views60 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

بعد از ۹‌ماه بالاخره یه اپیزود جدید ضبط کردیم. می‌دونیم خیلی بده نُه ماه یک بار اپیزود بدیم ولی از یه تیم مستقل بدون استودیو و در این اوضاع شخمی مملکت نمیشه بیشتر انتظار داشت. فصل دوم، اپیزود دهم: زندگی در نقطه ثابت بروئر کاری از مهرداد نعیمی و بورژین عبدالرزاقی نویسنده: مهرداد نعیمی با مشورت‌های بهزاد قدیانلو، بورژین عبدالرزاقی و هستی مهدوی

❤‍🔥33😍137👏5🐳2

4 Aug 2026, 23:42 UTC423 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026

از ستینگ لترباکس می‌تونید تمام فیلمهایی که دیدید رو به صورت فایل csv خروجی بگیرید و فایل رو واسه چت جی‌پی‌تی آپلود کنید. آنالیزهای خیلی جذابی بهتون میده. مثلا تمام ۱۲۶۰ فیلمی که دیدم رو بررسی کرد و بیست تا فیلم بهم پیشنهاد داده که مطمئنه من بهشون پنج ستاره میدم :))) جی‌پی‌تی: بعد از دیدن امتیازهایت، تصویر خیلی واضح‌تر شد. چیزی که اول فکر می‌کردم («سینمای انسانی و رابطه‌محور») درست بود، اما ناقص بود. تو به فیلم‌ها ن

👍219👏1

4 Aug 2026, 23:05 UTC437 views39 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Rental Family 2025 حتما شنیدید که توی ژاپن یه شغل هست که آدما میرن توی موقعیت‌های مختلف نقش اعضای خانواده یا همکار یا دوستان دیگران رو بازی می‌کنن. مثلا طرف از بچگی باباش رو ندیده و حالا یه بابا استخدام می‌کنه... این فیلم درباره همین موضوعه و خوبیش اینه که ایده رو حروم نکرده؛ چون جالب‌ترین وجه این ایده اونجاست که مثلاً تو یهو وارد زندگی یه غریبه میشی و این ارتباط به ظاهر فیکه ولی توی این مسیر ممکنه وابستگی، عشق، نفرت

28👍7👀3🐳1

24 Jul 2026, 22:11 UTC999 views80 reactionsread 6 August 2026

توی فلسفه یه اصطلاحی داریم به اسم Red Herring... که یه جور مغالطه منطقیه؛ یعنی اصل قضیه رو ندید بگیری و بحث رو ببری در یه ساحت دیگه و اونجا مزخرفاتِ به‌ظاهر منطقی بگی. یا به قول معروف Missing the forest for the trees. هرچی فکر کردم دیدم بهترین مثالش صداوسیما و امثال میثاقی هستند. به راحتی اصل قضیه رو ندید می‌گیرن که چی میشه که میلیونها میلیون از مردمِ ایران به درجه‌ای از نفرت و فرسودگی رسیدن، که از همه چیز این کشور،

👍5218👏5🥴3👌1👎1

24 Jul 2026, 21:34 UTC914 views42 reactionsread 6 August 2026

یه اپ هوش مصنوعی امروز باهاش ور می‌رفتم به اسم Glass Health مشاور مسائل پزشکیه خیلی خفن جواب میده و تحلیل می‌کنه. حداقل از چت جی پی تی بهتره برای این کار. بنظرم حتما ازش استفاده کنید.

👍2612👏2👎1🙏1

22 Jul 2026, 20:09 UTC907 views44 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

توی این انیمیشن یه صحنه هست که باید همه‌مون قاب کنیم بزنیم‌ روی دیوار: اول یه سری اتفاقات ساده کم‌کم تبدیل به جنگ‌های آخرالزمانی میشه و بعد کل ماجرا رو در مقیاس تمامِ یونیورس می‌بینیم که همه‌‌ی این ایدئولوژی‌ها و جنگ‌های عظیمِ انسان‌ها در حد گوز کائنات هم نیست.

👍2711👀3👏2👌1

22 Jul 2026, 12:32 UTC967 views100 reactionsread 6 August 2026

این ماجرای «چرا نمی‌ذارید کار کنم؟» که عادل گفته عادی‌ترین موضوع این مملکته و متاسفانه میلیونها نفر حتی اندازه‌ی عادل هم شرایط کار نداشتن. از اینایی که یه پیج ساده اینستاگرامی دارن تا محصولاتشون رو بفروشن تا اونایی که سعی می‌کنن پروژه‌های مستقلی راه بندازن. همه چیز این کشور جوری طراحی شده که مانعی در برابر کار و زندگی شخصی آدما باشه. ما با یه ساختاری مواجه هستیم که واقعا از اینکه یکی راحت زندگی و کار کنه ناراحت میشه

👍7018👏10👌1👎1

20 Jul 2026, 16:23 UTC876 views78 reactionsread 6 August 2026

فردا پوچ‌ترین امتحان زندگیم رو باید توی نظام مهندسی بدم. امتحان مبحث ۱۹ مقررات ملی ساختمان ایران. حالا چرا پوچ؟ چون از صبح دو بار این کتاب رو خوندم و حتی یک خط از این کتاب در ساختمانهای ایران رعایت نمیشه. مبحث ۱۹ درباره مصرف انرژی و درجه‌بندی ساختمانها و چرخه عمر ساختمونهاست. گاهی با خودم فکر می‌کنم ما در ایران واقعا برای چی این مقررات ملی ساختمان رو تدوین کردیم و مطالعه می‌کنیم وقتی اجرا نمیشه 🤔

👍50😢137😭6🤔1😁1

20 Jul 2026, 13:14 UTC901 views50 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

داره توضیح میده که چرا شریعتی یه شیاد بوده!

👍354👎4👏3🤣2👨‍💻1🤷‍♀1

10 Jul 2026, 14:32 UTC≈1,130 views93 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

آگاه‌ترین آدم در مسئله‌ی چپ و راست صادق هدایت بود. هرگز حاضر نشد از این برچسب‌های مسخره بهش بزنن. هم اشرافیت رو نقد می‌کرد هم روحانیون رو. هم خرافات رو هم استبداد رو. درعین حال که به نابرابری اجتماعی نقد داشت هرگز حاضر نشد مثل بقیه نویسنده‌های اون دوره عضو حزب توده بشه یا عضو حزب مقابلش. با وجودی که در نوشته‌هاش تندترین نقدها رو میشه دید اما هیچوقت از این کتابهای الکی سیاسی با ژست‌های حزبی ننوشت. صادق هدایت مستقل، بد

63👍22👎5👏3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @MehrdadNaeimi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مهرداد” (@MehrdadNaeimi), 993 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MehrdadNaeimi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.