Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MegisakiARK x Priestess

Channel

MegisakiARK x Priestess

@MegisakiARKxPriestess

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

62subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003383950030
TypeChannel
Username@MegisakiARKxPriestess
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/MegisakiARKxPriestess

Growth

5662596 August 2026 — 58 subscribers10 August 2026 — 58 subscribers29 August 2026 — 56 subscribers8 September 2026 — 62 subscribers6 August 20268 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 32 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55–63 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 06:1862+6
29 Aug 2026, 06:5456-2
10 Aug 2026, 06:0158no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:4858first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
35s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

46 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘2350.0%
1226.1%
👎510.9%
❤‍🔥48.70%
🤔24.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC16 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4sKXG2o/ вторая версия уже в тик токе

💘2

Signed MegisakiARK

9 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC20 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Какой вариант лучше?

💘2

Signed MegisakiARK

9 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTC21 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥1💘1

Signed ƿʀɪ૯ઽ੮૯ઽઽ

8 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC24 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Наверное нам нужно что-то менять, пока что я не заставляю и не прошу жрицу делать Эдиты. Единственное, что мы не поменяем - это тему эдитов, Arknights навеки

💘1

Signed MegisakiARK

8 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC28 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Все нормально

❤‍🔥3💘1

Signed MegisakiARK

8 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC26 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4ban74n/ Эдит уже на канале

2💘1

Signed ƿʀɪ૯ઽ੮૯ઽઽ

8 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTC26 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня в 13:00 эдит

💘3

Signed ƿʀɪ૯ઽ੮૯ઽઽ

7 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTC27 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

3

Signed MegisakiARK

7 Aug 2026, 19:23 UTC25 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Колаборационный Эдит готов

2

Signed MegisakiARK

7 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC28 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

5

Signed ƿʀɪ૯ઽ੮૯ઽઽ

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @MegisakiARKxPriestess. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTCAnonymous Poll11 voters

Какой тип эдитов делать больше?

  1. Любые55%
  2. Грустные18%
  3. Жёсткие27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MegisakiARK x Priestess” (@MegisakiARKxPriestess), 62 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MegisakiARKxPriestess.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.