Channel
@MediaZed
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
927,337subscribers
-39,825 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004274060432 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MediaZed |
| Description | تو ضد مدیا هر چی که حس کنم سرگرمت میکنه میزارم نه قراره همه چیز باب میلت باشه نه من خیلی مودبم، حداقلش اینه که میدونی فیک و مصنوعی نیستم |
| Created | Between 1 May 2026 and 5 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MediaZed |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 927,337 | -6,531 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 933,868 | -7,358 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 941,226 | -7,170 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 948,396 | -5,941 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 954,337 | -7,387 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 961,724 | -5,438 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 967,162 | first reading |
162 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 162 (5 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,932,650 |
| Reactions total | 314,319 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 56 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /19347 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC | 320 minutes – 58 minutes old | 14,900 views ~1,473 reactions | 60 minutes: 14,900 | not yet at 24h | 20 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /19337 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC | 66 minutes – 2.3 hours old | 25,500 views ~582 reactions | 60 minutes: 14,706 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 46 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /19327 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC | 612 minutes – 2.4 hours old | 25,400 views ~715 reactions | 60 minutes: 15,623 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 39 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /19287 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC | 622 minutes – 2.5 hours old | 26,400 views ~866 reactions | 60 minutes: 16,700 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 37 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /19277 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC | 28 minutes – 38 minutes old | 12,900 views ~294 reactions | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 13 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /19267 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTC | 962 seconds – 3.8 hours old | 34,900 views ~801 reactions | 60 minutes: 18,400 → 3.0 hours: 32,900still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 56 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /19257 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC | 912 minutes – 4.0 hours old | 34,900 views ~786 reactions | 60 minutes: 18,441 interp. → 3.0 hours: 31,685 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 54 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /19247 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC | 1024 minutes – 4.8 hours old | 39,800 views ~1,781 reactions | 60 minutes: 17,718 interp. → 3.0 hours: 34,425 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 71 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
314,319 reactions across 162 posts, in 67 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 137,311 | 43.7% | |
| 🖕 | 38,485 | 12.2% | |
| 😐 | 30,232 | 9.62% | |
| ❤ | 28,614 | 9.10% | |
| 💔 | 26,290 | 8.36% | |
| 👍 | 8,696 | 2.77% | |
| 💩 | 8,451 | 2.69% | |
| 😁 | 8,411 | 2.68% | |
| 🤮 | 6,287 | 2.00% | |
| 🤯 | 4,387 | 1.40% | |
| 👏 | 3,958 | 1.26% | |
| 🔥 | 2,835 | 0.902% | |
| 👎 | 2,163 | 0.688% | |
| 😡 | 2,042 | 0.65% | |
| 🗿 | 724 | 0.23% | |
| 😭 | 681 | 0.217% | |
| ❤🔥 | 615 | 0.196% | |
| 😨 | 465 | 0.148% | |
| 🤔 | 444 | 0.141% | |
| 🍌 | 393 | 0.125% | |
| 47 further kinds | 2,835 | 0.902% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 162 of the 162 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 314,319reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 162 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔴یه بلاگر خانوم اومده با شوهر و بچهش رفته به سگا غذا داده و کلیپشو با آهنگ ‘بریم نجف’ گذاشته اینستاگرام حالا این کلیپ حسابی صدای مذهبیا رو در آورده و میگن این خانوم این کلیپ رو برای مسخره کردن امام علی گذاشته و باید باهاش برخورد بشه. حرم امام علی توی نجف هستش و میگن محلی که سگها اونجا هستن رو به نجف تشبیه کرده. @MediaZed
🤣852🖕233❤100👏36👎28👍19🤯9💩7
یه نفر اومده کامنت گذاشته نوشته اگه یه درصد برای دختره اتفاقی بیوفته جواب مامان باباشو چی میخوای بدی ؟ و حالا جواب پسره 😂:
🤣758💩64😐39❤15👍11🖕6👎2🤝1
🔴اعتماد در رابطه موج میزنه ، یارو دوست دخترشو بلند کرده اورده بالای پل میگه باید تا وسط پل بیای میخوام ازت عکس بگیرم : @MediaZed
🤣399🤯86🖕53😐34❤18😡9👍6💩6
داداش من درو بستم حسن نیست باز کنه ، باید چیکارکنم؟
🤣647🤷♂17❤5🖕4👍2🐳1😭1
حسن ❌ میگ میگ ✅ @MediaZed
🤣667👍17❤13⚡6🖕5😐5👏2
دیشب تو تهران چندتا دختر پاهاشونو از شیشه ماشین آورده بودن بیرون، پسرام میرفتن دست میزدن به پاهاشون. @MediaZed
😐1,050🖕162🤣98🤮62💩52❤21💔7🙉5
تو برنامه ویلا اکسو داشتن دعوا میکردن که دختره به پسره کاندوم میده که برن سکس کنن؛ بهشم میگه طمعای دیگشم دارم. @MediaZed
😐956🤣117🖕85💩72🤮45❤15👎7💔6
🔴فیلمای وایرال شده دیروز از ساحل «متل قو» و «بابلسر» در استان مازندران. شبیه هندوستان شدیم. انگار بمبئیه. @MediaZed
🤣683💔213💩50❤35😐34👍12👎9🖕7
تو عشق ابدی ورژن صربستانی این مرده وقتی پیشنهادش رد شد سعی کرد خانمه رو خفه بکنه که تیم های امنیتی مداخله کردند. @MediaZed
🤣914😐456🤯29❤20😡17🤡10👏5👍4
👀 فکر میکنی فوتبال رو خوب میشناسی؟ پس فقط تماشاگر نباش؛ پیشبینیتو ثبت کن و ببین چقدر درست بازی رو میخونی. 🎯⚽️ 🎁 کاربران جدید: ۵۰$ بونوس ثبتنام 🚀 بونوسهای واریز هم منتظرته.
🖕27❤15👍3
فرار کنیم؟؟ کل زندگیمون دنبال همچین ادمی میگشتیم
🤣913😐377💩158🖕133👍30🤮23🤯8🍌3
🔴اگه با دختری خواستی بری تو رابطه این دوتا تتورو داشت ازش فرار کن: • معنی تتو آناناس برعکس🍍: میشه زوج هایی که پارتنرشون رو باهم عوض میکنن. • معنی تتو پاپیون پشت ران پا🎀: به معنی اینه که پایه هر کاری هست و هیچ خط قرمزی براش وجود نداره. @MediaZed
🤣843🗿233🖕94❤39👎35💩30🤔18🤡16
Showing the 12 most recent of 162 posts we hold for @MediaZed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 216,017 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@MediaZed named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐙𝐞𝐝 𝐌𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐚” (@MediaZed), 927,337 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MediaZed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.