راجب مقالات و مستندات فنی یا غیر فنی که میخونم و علایقم اینجا مینویسم :)
گروه کانال: https://t.me/MdDailyGap
کورس ها: https://t.me/MdDaily/395
وبلاگ: https://mddaily.ir
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 751–752 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 02:01
752
no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:02
752
+1
7 Aug 2026, 12:25
751
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 24 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.8%
avg views ÷ 752 subscribers
Avg views / post
164
1 post measured
Reaction rate
7.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
19 (24 October 2025 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
164
Reactions total
12
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 02:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
243
Videos
15
Links
287
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
255 reactions across 19 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
100
39.2%
❤🔥
50
19.6%
👍
40
15.7%
🎉
20
7.84%
🔥
11
4.31%
👏
9
3.53%
🤣
8
3.14%
👌
6
2.35%
⚡
3
1.18%
👨💻
2
0.784%
😍
2
0.784%
✍
1
0.392%
💯
1
0.392%
😁
1
0.392%
🤝
1
0.392%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 255reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 October 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 19 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MdDaily. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 October 2025 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
خِفتم کن!
وقتی با AI کد میزنید، بزرگترین سم اینه که شما فقط بگی چی میخوای و اونم یه مشت کد بپاشه جلتون و شما هم بیفکر فقط «Accept» بزنید. اینجوری بعد از نیم ساعت کلاً پرت میشید که پروژه داره به کجا میره و کنترل از دستتون در میره.
تکنیک اینه که بهش بگی: «Grill me» (خفتم کن!)
درواقع داری بهش میگی قبل از اینکه دست به کد بشی، حتی قبل از اینکه به پلن برسی، زیر و بم قضیه رو ازم بکش بیرون. سوالای سخت بپرس، حالتهای…
سلام به همگی 🫶
اول از همه نوروز🤍🐎🤍اتون مبارک باشه.
وقتی که داشتم پیام تبریک نوروز ۱۴۰۴ رو مینوشتم و درگیر شوخی با
سال ۴۰۴ بودیم، این سال مثل اسمش با کلی اتفاقات همراه بود و کلی چیز دیدیم و داغدار شدیم و در نهایت با جنگ به پایان رسید.
امسال درحالی سال رو تحویل میکنیم که برای روز هاس در خاموشی دیجیتال به سر میبریم و به سختی به اینترنت ازاد متصل هستیم و حتی نمیدونم چند نفر قراره این پیام من رو ببین.
به هرحال، ا…
معرفی llmfit: ابزاری برای پیدا کردن مدل هوش مصنوعی مناسب سختافزار شما
این پروژه خیلی باحاله با راست نوشته شده و حجم نصبش کلا چند مگه و تحت ترمینال TUI اجرا میشه
میاد بر اساس نیاز های سخت افزاری مدل ها بهتون میگه که با توجه به سیستمون کدوم مدل اجراش به چه صورته و چه قدر منابع مصرف میکنه ازتون
👩💻 https://github.com/AlexsJones/llmfit
—-
💡 مثل همیشه کنجکاو بمونید :)
🆔 @MdDaily
توسعه وب فراتر از فرانتاند و بکانده
خیلیا فکر میکنن توسعه وب یا اپلیکیشن سادهست: فرانت، بک، تمام! تصور عمومی اینه که اگه بشه دیتا رو از دیتابیس به رابط کاربری (UI) رسوند، کار تمومه. واسه همین همهی تمرکز میره روی روتها و کامپوننتها، اما تهش پروژهها انگار یه چیزی کم دارن.
واقعیت اینه که توسعه وب یا اپلیکیشن، دقیقاً همون اتفاقاتیه که بین فرانت و بک میافته.
🧠 مدل ذهنی اولیه
معمولاً یاد میگیریم همهچیز رو ت…
دردسرِ کدهای «تقریباً درست»
🔍 تصور کن سهشنبه هفته پیشه و یه برنامهنویس سه ساعت تمام وقتش رو گذاشته تا باگی رو پیدا کنه که اصلاً وجود خارجی نداره!
کد در ظاهر حرف نداشت؛ ساختار تمیز، رعایت تمام اصول و حتی کامنتهای دقیق برای هر تابع. اما مشکل از جای عجیبی آب میخورد: یکی از تابعها داشت مسئلهای رو حل میکرد که اصلاً کسی ازش نخواسته بود! Claude با اون دانشِ الگویابیِ بیپایانش، خودش تصمیم گرفته بود که اندپوینت API …
ترس از جا ماندن (FOMO) چیست و چگونه با آن کنار بیاییم؟ ۷ تمرین ساده برای آرامش ذهن
لحظهای را تصور کنید که وارد اینستاگرام شدهاید و پستها و استوریهای دیگران را میبینید: دوستانی که به سفر خارج از کشور میروند، همکارانی که موفقیتهایی بزرگ را جشن میگیرند و غریبههایی که به نظر میرسد یک زندگی رویایی برای خود ساختهاند. ذهنتان بیاختیار شروع میکند به مقایسه: «چرا همه دارند پیشرفت میکنند و من هنوز تغییر ملموسی …
خطای CORS باگ نیست؛ داره دقیقاً از وباپلیکیشن شما محافظت میکنه.
اگه با API کار کرده باشی، حتماً با این ارور اعصابخُردکن برخورد کردی:
پیغام Access to fetch has been blocked by CORS policy (مسدود شدن درخواست بهخاطر سیاست CORS)
آدرس درسته، کدت سالمه، اما مرورگر اجازه نمیده. نکته مهم اینه: CORS خطا نیست؛ یه مکانیزم امنیتیه که درست داره کارش رو انجام میده.
بریم ببینیم داستان چیه 👇
اول اصل ماجرا: قانون SOP
مرورگ…
اصلاً من متخصّصم یا نه؟ شاید نکته اصلی همینه! 🤔
داشتم یه مقاله به اسم I Don't Know If I'm An Expert (And That Might Be the Point) میخوندم که نویسنده مقاله داستان رو از جایی شروع میکنه که همهمون ممکنه توش گیر کرده باشیم. اون یه شرکت امنیت سایبری داره، کلی مدرک معتبرِ جهانی تو جیبشه و حتی شش تا کتاب هم نوشته . اما میگه وقتی داشتم رزومهم رو پر میکردم و به بخش «تخصصها» رسیدم، یهو خشکم زد! نه اینکه چیزی بلد نباشم،…
بیشتر چتباتها وقت آدم رو با تعارف و جوابهای الکی طولانی تلف میکنن. این دوتا پرامپتی که نوشتم رو حدود یک ماهه دارم استفاده میکنم؛ باعث میشه مدل بره سر اصل مطلب، صادقانهتر جواب بده و دست از «راضی نگه داشتن» برداره.
میتونید یکی از این چنتا رو بسته به نیازتون توی بخش Custom Instructions در ChatGPT یا قسمت System Instructions در Gemini بذارید.
🤖 اگه میخواین مدل صادق و رک باشه:
From now on, be completely honest a…
🥳🎆 یلدای پارسی خجسته🌟🤩
✨به بهانه یلدای باستانی و این سنت زیبای پارسی، پارس پک یه مسابقه با حال گذاشته و قراره هدایای جذابی تقدیمتون کنه🎁
کافیه برین به لینک پایین و در پیکار شرکت کنید و انارهای شب یلدارو از دست اهریمن نجات بدین🆘
هرچی بیشتر انار نجات بدین شانستون در قرعه کشی جوایز بیشتر میشه🎲
با توجه به نتیجه بازی هم بهت میگه کدوم شخصیت ایران باستان هستی و روش های دیگه ای هم برای افزایش شانس قرعه کشی هستش🆙
⭕️ برای…
❤🔥3🤣1
Signed Mahan
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @MdDaily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Md Daily” (@MdDaily), 752 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MdDaily.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.